I'm sure the NCAA is prepared to release it's hard evidence that fast paced play results in more injuries. Outside of government if there is an organization anywhere with less credibility than the NCAA I'd like to know what it is.
You can call this the "we want to fuck over Oregon" rule. Or the "we're a bunch of whiny fucking cunts because we can't beat Auburn when we're entitled to do so just by showing up" rule.
Teams don't have to snap it within 10 seconds to stop the defense from substitution. If the defense starts to sub, they snap it right away with no play called to get the penalty. Manning did this with the Colts a lot.
So the proposed rule lets the defense know they have ten seconds to sub. The offense can't get right to the line and fake them out of a substitution
The game has gone a little too far in the direction of giving advantages to the offense IMO.
A defense should have every opportunity to make situational substitutions as the offense does.
I don't see why taking out the "we're running to the line to prevent substitutions, if you sub we're going to snap it with no play to get a free 5 yards, and if you don't, we're going to stand around for 25 seconds before snapping it" is good for football.
The proposed rule has some dreckfest in it ... but it's not necessarily in the wrong direction.
I'm all for rules that take away the ability for those that like to exploit loopholes to be able to exploit young men.
The game of football should boil down to your ability to have better skills and execution than the other team. Not the ability to quick snap people to death.
The game has gone a little too far in the direction of giving advantages to the offense IMO.
A defense should have every opportunity to make situational substitutions as the offense does.
I don't see why taking out the "we're running to the line to prevent substitutions, if you sub we're going to snap it with no play to get a free 5 yards, and if you don't, we're going to stand around for 25 seconds before snapping it" is good for football.
The proposed rule has some dreckfest in it ... but it's not necessarily in the wrong direction.
I'm all for rules that take away the ability for those that like to exploit loopholes to be able to exploit young men.
The game of football should boil down to your ability to have better skills and execution than the other team. Not the ability to quick snap people to death.
Hello there.
If the offense substitutes, the defense is allowed to substitute also.
Comments
I bet he succeeds, too.
Nick Saban is a bad mofo.
Cerebral analysis!
A defense should have every opportunity to make situational substitutions as the offense does.
I don't see why taking out the "we're running to the line to prevent substitutions, if you sub we're going to snap it with no play to get a free 5 yards, and if you don't, we're going to stand around for 25 seconds before snapping it" is good for football.
The proposed rule has some dreckfest in it ... but it's not necessarily in the wrong direction.
I'm all for rules that take away the ability for those that like to exploit loopholes to be able to exploit young men.
The game of football should boil down to your ability to have better skills and execution than the other team. Not the ability to quick snap people to death.
If the offense substitutes, the defense is allowed to substitute also.
Being in shape is a key skill of football.