NCAA Proposes Rule Changes to Slow Offenses. . .
Comments
-
Got me on that one - well done...tracker said:
Doogman.com?RaccoonHarry said:I'm sure the NCAA is prepared to release it's hard evidence that fast paced play results in more injuries. Outside of government if there is an organization anywhere with less credibility than the NCAA I'd like to know what it is.
-
This rule might stop Oregon fans from booing injured players as loudly as they've been doing. :-$
-
Pictures or it never happendpriapism said:This rule might stop Oregon fans from booing injured players as loudly as they've been doing. :-$
-
Nick Saban must be an honorary doog. Talk about a sore loser. Dude can't handle the hurry up so he tries to kill it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:There sure are a lot of closeted Doogs in this thread.
I bet he succeeds, too.
Nick Saban is a bad mofo.
-
I never boo the players
-
You can call this the "we want to fuck over Oregon" rule. Or the "we're a bunch of whiny fucking cunts because we can't beat Auburn when we're entitled to do so just by showing up" rule.
-
RaceBannon said:
Teams don't have to snap it within 10 seconds to stop the defense from substitution. If the defense starts to sub, they snap it right away with no play called to get the penalty. Manning did this with the Colts a lot.
So the proposed rule lets the defense know they have ten seconds to sub. The offense can't get right to the line and fake them out of a substitution
Cerebral analysis! -
The game has gone a little too far in the direction of giving advantages to the offense IMO.
A defense should have every opportunity to make situational substitutions as the offense does.
I don't see why taking out the "we're running to the line to prevent substitutions, if you sub we're going to snap it with no play to get a free 5 yards, and if you don't, we're going to stand around for 25 seconds before snapping it" is good for football.
The proposed rule has some dreckfest in it ... but it's not necessarily in the wrong direction.
I'm all for rules that take away the ability for those that like to exploit loopholes to be able to exploit young men.
The game of football should boil down to your ability to have better skills and execution than the other team. Not the ability to quick snap people to death. -
Hello there.Tequilla said:The game has gone a little too far in the direction of giving advantages to the offense IMO.
A defense should have every opportunity to make situational substitutions as the offense does.
I don't see why taking out the "we're running to the line to prevent substitutions, if you sub we're going to snap it with no play to get a free 5 yards, and if you don't, we're going to stand around for 25 seconds before snapping it" is good for football.
The proposed rule has some dreckfest in it ... but it's not necessarily in the wrong direction.
I'm all for rules that take away the ability for those that like to exploit loopholes to be able to exploit young men.
The game of football should boil down to your ability to have better skills and execution than the other team. Not the ability to quick snap people to death.
If the offense substitutes, the defense is allowed to substitute also.
Being in shape is a key skill of football.
