Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

PM to AOG

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    But but but Hillary.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    pawz said:





    #HondoBros #lapdog

    You believe that?
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club

    pawz said:





    #HondoBros #lapdog

    You believe that?
    Why not?
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    pawz said:

    pawz said:





    #HondoBros #lapdog

    You believe that?
    Why not?
    Because you are selective with the facts, don't weight context and relevance, then you reach the wrong conclusions.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999

    pawz said:

    pawz said:





    #HondoBros #lapdog

    You believe that?
    Why not?
    Because you are selective with the facts, don't weight context and relevance, then you reach the wrong conclusions.
    Main fact is Hillary’s campaign actually paid Russians (via FusionGPS) for election activities in the 2016 election cycle...those on the left love to forget that little fact.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club

    pawz said:

    pawz said:





    #HondoBros #lapdog

    You believe that?
    Why not?
    Because you are selective with the facts, don't weight context and relevance, then you reach the wrong conclusions.
    Main fact is Hillary’s campaign actually paid Russians (via FusionGPS) for election activities in the 2016 election cycle...those on the left love to forget that little fact.
    In other words, the actual collusion.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    pawz said:

    pawz said:





    #HondoBros #lapdog

    You believe that?
    Why not?
    Because you are selective with the facts, don't weight context and relevance, then you reach the wrong conclusions.
    Main fact is Hillary’s campaign actually paid Russians (via FusionGPS) for election activities in the 2016 election cycle...those on the left love to forget that little fact.
    It was also disclosed. Unlike Trump's team that lied about the meetings.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    edited July 2019
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:





    #HondoBros #lapdog

    You believe that?
    Why not?
    Because you are selective with the facts, don't weight context and relevance, then you reach the wrong conclusions.
    Main fact is Hillary’s campaign actually paid Russians (via FusionGPS) for election activities in the 2016 election cycle...those on the left love to forget that little fact.
    It was also disclosed. Unlike Trump's team that lied about the meetings.
    Huh? So disclosed it took a year after the election to find out Hillary funded it, and so disclosed Fusion GPS still has not disclosed which Russians that they actually paid.

    And for some reason nobody including Mueller brings up the actual Russian lawyer that Obama’s team magically got a waver for just so she could go to NYC and meet with the Trump team, and who just happened to meet with a representative of Hillary’s campaign before and after that meeting.

    Keep living in your mentally deranged fantasy world...
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    I'm not going to bother to explain this to you dumbfucks, other than to point out the obvious: Hillary could still be investigated as a separate issue. Sweet mother of fuck are you idiots
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club

    I'm not going to bother to explain this to you dumbfucks, other than to point out the obvious: Hillary could still be investigated as a separate issue. Sweet mother of fuck are you idiots

    No no no.

    Please explain.

    Like we are 3yo, so we can understand.
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Killary must go to bed every night thanking Lucifer that those libtards Trump, Sessions and Barr have been protecting her. I mean if it so obvious that the morons on HH know it just imagine what would happen if someone who truly hates her ascended to a position where they could push for her prosecution!
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,417 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    Killary must go to bed every night thanking Lucifer that those libtards Trump, Sessions and Barr have been protecting her. I mean if it so obvious that the morons on HH know it just imagine what would happen if someone who truly hates her ascended to a position where they could push for her prosecution!

    Huh?

    de Engrish preas
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    edited July 2019
    Impeach Hilary.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:





    #HondoBros #lapdog

    You believe that?
    Why not?
    Because you are selective with the facts, don't weight context and relevance, then you reach the wrong conclusions.
    Main fact is Hillary’s campaign actually paid Russians (via FusionGPS) for election activities in the 2016 election cycle...those on the left love to forget that little fact.
    It was also disclosed. Unlike Trump's team that lied about the meetings.
    Huh? So disclosed it took a year after the election to find out Hillary funded it, and so disclosed Fusion GPS still has not disclosed which Russians that they actually paid.

    And for some reason nobody including Mueller brings up the actual Russian lawyer that Obama’s team magically got a waver for just so she could go to NYC and meet with the Trump team, and who just happened to meet with a representative of Hillary’s campaign before and after that meeting.

    Keep living in your mentally deranged fantasy world...
    Fusion GPS said at the time that it was paid $1.02 million from the law firm, and Steele’s firm was paid $168,000 out of that amount. The Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign did disclose the total amount that they paid to the Perkins Coie firm on campaign finance reports.

    https://variety.com/2018/politics/news/omarosa-trump-the-view-1202934826/
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,738 Founders Club

    pawz said:

    pawz said:





    #HondoBros #lapdog

    You believe that?
    Why not?
    Because you are selective with the facts, don't weight context and relevance, then you reach the wrong conclusions.
    lol
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:





    #HondoBros #lapdog

    You believe that?
    Why not?
    Because you are selective with the facts, don't weight context and relevance, then you reach the wrong conclusions.
    Main fact is Hillary’s campaign actually paid Russians (via FusionGPS) for election activities in the 2016 election cycle...those on the left love to forget that little fact.
    It was also disclosed. Unlike Trump's team that lied about the meetings.
    Huh? So disclosed it took a year after the election to find out Hillary funded it, and so disclosed Fusion GPS still has not disclosed which Russians that they actually paid.

    And for some reason nobody including Mueller brings up the actual Russian lawyer that Obama’s team magically got a waver for just so she could go to NYC and meet with the Trump team, and who just happened to meet with a representative of Hillary’s campaign before and after that meeting.

    Keep living in your mentally deranged fantasy world...
    Fusion GPS said at the time that it was paid $1.02 million from the law firm, and Steele’s firm was paid $168,000 out of that amount. The Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign did disclose the total amount that they paid to the Perkins Coie firm on campaign finance reports.

    https://variety.com/2018/politics/news/omarosa-trump-the-view-1202934826/
    God you have a speed limit IQ. Nobody publically knew who paid for the dossier until something like Oct 2017...Clinton’s campaign had basically lied on their forms and posted their money to Perkins was for “campaign finance reports”, not funding Russian nationals to make up crazy shite on Trump. As the article you link says.

    But thanks for showing off how clueless you are...
  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    The dossier wasn't used to influence the election. So there's that too.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    So it wasn’t being pushed by several journalists before the election, and Hillary didn’t poast press releases about Trump and Russia before the election? And who knows what else the Feds were listening in on and passing along to the Clinton campaign from the illegal FISA spying on campaign members.

    Keep lying...
  • HustlinOwl
    HustlinOwl Member Posts: 953
    There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,672 Founders Club

    There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

    Just another pathological liar
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999

    There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

    I’m sure Isokoff’s stories linking the Trump campaign to Putin (from HondoFS’s favorite Yahoo! Fake News and spread from there) along with Hillary’s press releases and such just don’t mean anything if you close your eyes and say LALALALALA....

    And then amazingly enough these fake news stories were good enough to give a FISA court to do more illegal spying.

    Keep lying...
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

    If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,661
    2001400ex said:

    There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

    If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?
    Id be mad if he werent.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Y
    2001400ex said:

    There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

    If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?
    Caring about what the president does in his sex life jumped the shark a couple decades ago.
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470

    Y

    2001400ex said:

    There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

    If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?
    Caring about what the president does in his sex life jumped the shark a couple decades ago.
    It’s only kompromat until he admits it happened and there’s tapes.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Y

    2001400ex said:

    There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

    If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?
    Caring about what the president does in his sex life jumped the shark a couple decades ago.
    See we can find common ground. In other words, you just admitted the Steele dossier had zero effect on the election.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    Y

    2001400ex said:

    There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

    If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?
    Caring about what the president does in his sex life jumped the shark a couple decades ago.
    See we can find common ground. In other words, you just admitted the Steele dossier had zero effect on the election.
    I can only imagine the mental gymnastics you had to perform to get that conclusion. I have never mentioned Steele her or anywhere in my life.

    Steele, no Steele, IDGAF. Trump was elected. If we? Don’t like it, vote him out in 2020. Or you can look like fag and have a temper tantrum for 4 years.

    Listen to a wise wise man.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UcjaO2953os