PM to AOG

HustlinOwl

There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

RaceBannon

HustlinOwl said:

There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

Just another pathological liar

HoustonHusky

HustlinOwl said:

There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

I’m sure Isokoff’s stories linking the Trump campaign to Putin (from HondoFS’s favorite Yahoo! Fake News and spread from there) along with Hillary’s press releases and such just don’t mean anything if you close your eyes and say LALALALALA....

And then amazingly enough these fake news stories were good enough to give a FISA court to do more illegal spying.

Keep lying...

2001400ex

HustlinOwl said:

There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?

Pitchfork51

2001400ex said:

HustlinOwl said:

There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?

Id be mad if he werent.

MikeDamone

Y

2001400ex said:

HustlinOwl said:

There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?

Caring about what the president does in his sex life jumped the shark a couple decades ago.

GDS

MikeDamone said:

Y

2001400ex said:

HustlinOwl said:

There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?

Caring about what the president does in his sex life jumped the shark a couple decades ago.

It’s only kompromat until he admits it happened and there’s tapes.

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

Y

2001400ex said:

HustlinOwl said:

There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?

Caring about what the president does in his sex life jumped the shark a couple decades ago.

See we can find common ground. In other words, you just admitted the Steele dossier had zero effect on the election.

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

Y

2001400ex said:

HustlinOwl said:

There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.

If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?

Caring about what the president does in his sex life jumped the shark a couple decades ago.

See we can find common ground. In other words, you just admitted the Steele dossier had zero effect on the election.

I can only imagine the mental gymnastics you had to perform to get that conclusion. I have never mentioned Steele her or anywhere in my life.

Steele, no Steele, IDGAF. Trump was elected. If we? Don’t like it, vote him out in 2020. Or you can look like fag and have a temper tantrum for 4 years.

Listen to a wise wise man.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UcjaO2953os