PM to AOG
Comments
-
There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.
-
Just another pathological liarHustlinOwl said:There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.
-
I’m sure Isokoff’s stories linking the Trump campaign to Putin (from HondoFS’s favorite Yahoo! Fake News and spread from there) along with Hillary’s press releases and such just don’t mean anything if you close your eyes and say LALALALALA....HustlinOwl said:There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.
And then amazingly enough these fake news stories were good enough to give a FISA court to do more illegal spying.
Keep lying...
-
If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?HustlinOwl said:There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.
-
Id be mad if he werent.2001400ex said:
If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?HustlinOwl said:There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.
-
Y
Caring about what the president does in his sex life jumped the shark a couple decades ago.2001400ex said:
If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?HustlinOwl said:There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.
-
It’s only kompromat until he admits it happened and there’s tapes.MikeDamone said:Y
Caring about what the president does in his sex life jumped the shark a couple decades ago.2001400ex said:
If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?HustlinOwl said:There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.
-
See we can find common ground. In other words, you just admitted the Steele dossier had zero effect on the election.MikeDamone said:Y
Caring about what the president does in his sex life jumped the shark a couple decades ago.2001400ex said:
If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?HustlinOwl said:There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.
-
I can only imagine the mental gymnastics you had to perform to get that conclusion. I have never mentioned Steele her or anywhere in my life.2001400ex said:
See we can find common ground. In other words, you just admitted the Steele dossier had zero effect on the election.MikeDamone said:Y
Caring about what the president does in his sex life jumped the shark a couple decades ago.2001400ex said:
If anything it helped rile up the Trump base. Who doesn't want the president to be into water sports with hookers?HustlinOwl said:There was a small blurb on Mother Jones a few days before the election, but no details of any relevance. It wasn't used to influence the election.
Steele, no Steele, IDGAF. Trump was elected. If we? Don’t like it, vote him out in 2020. Or you can look like fag and have a temper tantrum for 4 years.
Listen to a wise wise man.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UcjaO2953os
