Judge Nap ( or is it Nip) thinks HondoBros still have a shot.
Comments
-
It's tough for Hondo, he really wants to play with older kids but he knows he just isn't up to intellectually. It would be nice for him to explain why what was said is "Rush Limbaugh mind" but he knows he can't. So this is the best you're going to get from Hondo. He really is the retarded little mascot for this board.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Lol anything to avoid the topic of the day. I am getting a kick out of it.2001400ex said:
A look inside the Rush Limbaugh numbed mind.WestlinnDuck said:Almost every so-called mainstream dems support open borders. This will be a major issue in the 2020 election. Pretty clear that it's the dems obstructing border enforcement. Pointing out that all the dems running for president support free medical care for illegals isn't racist. Race card will not save dems in swing districts.
-
Hondo is the kid who keeps getting hazed thinking it's all fun and games and still doesn't realize that no one wants him around
-
Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever!!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
-
Alabama refused to follow federal law.SFGbob said:
Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever!!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
California is in full compliance with federal law.
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards. -
That's being generous.Pitchfork51 said:Hondo is the kid who keeps getting hazed thinking it's all fun and games and still doesn't realize that no one wants him around
-
CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter.
-
No one in California is blocking, impeding or interfering at all with federal law enforcement. Trump can enforce federal law at his will. He will not, however, have access to or the cooperation of state or local resources.PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter.
Send in all the federal storm troopers and brown shirted thugs you want. What’s stopping you? -
<
Federales >>> States. US Grant - Appomattox, VA, April '65PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter. -
Agree. Everyone agrees. Enforce federal law to your heart’s content. California is not interfering or impeding that. Golden staters however will not lift a finger or provide a single state dollar of support.YellowSnow said:<
Federales >>> States. US Grant - Appomattox, VA, April '65PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter. -
YellowSnow said:
<
Federales >>> States. US Grant - Appomattox, VA, April '65PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter.
I prefer the Sherman approach to educating the silly sovereign state mentality.
-
JFC, why can’t you take “yes” for an answer. California is complying with federal law in every step of the process. Just don’t ever expect our cooperation. How many times does it take for trumptards to accept that?PurpleThrobber said:YellowSnow said:<
Federales >>> States. US Grant - Appomattox, VA, April '65PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter.
I prefer the Sherman approach to educating the silly sovereign state mentality. -
Roll over and say ‘uncle’.CirrhosisDawg said:
JFC, why can’t you take “yes” for an answer. California is complying with federal law in every step of the process. Just don’t ever expect our cooperation. How many times does it take for trumptards to accept that?PurpleThrobber said:YellowSnow said:<
Federales >>> States. US Grant - Appomattox, VA, April '65PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter.
I prefer the Sherman approach to educating the silly sovereign state mentality.
And bring lube for when Trump sends in federal troops to the Tiajuana border crossing and steps up ICE raids up to Orange County. -
Sounds TUFF! Any day now?PurpleThrobber said:
Roll over and say ‘uncle’.CirrhosisDawg said:
JFC, why can’t you take “yes” for an answer. California is complying with federal law in every step of the process. Just don’t ever expect our cooperation. How many times does it take for trumptards to accept that?PurpleThrobber said:YellowSnow said:<
Federales >>> States. US Grant - Appomattox, VA, April '65PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter.
I prefer the Sherman approach to educating the silly sovereign state mentality.
And bring lube for when Trump sends in federal troops to the Tiajuana border crossing and steps up ICE raids up to Orange County. -
If the typhus doesn’t get you first.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sounds TUFF! Any day now?PurpleThrobber said:
Roll over and say ‘uncle’.CirrhosisDawg said:
JFC, why can’t you take “yes” for an answer. California is complying with federal law in every step of the process. Just don’t ever expect our cooperation. How many times does it take for trumptards to accept that?PurpleThrobber said:YellowSnow said:<
Federales >>> States. US Grant - Appomattox, VA, April '65PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter.
I prefer the Sherman approach to educating the silly sovereign state mentality.
And bring lube for when Trump sends in federal troops to the Tiajuana border crossing and steps up ICE raids up to Orange County. -
Dialed-in as always!PurpleThrobber said:
If the typhus doesn’t get you first.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sounds TUFF! Any day now?PurpleThrobber said:
Roll over and say ‘uncle’.CirrhosisDawg said:
JFC, why can’t you take “yes” for an answer. California is complying with federal law in every step of the process. Just don’t ever expect our cooperation. How many times does it take for trumptards to accept that?PurpleThrobber said:YellowSnow said:<
Federales >>> States. US Grant - Appomattox, VA, April '65PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter.
I prefer the Sherman approach to educating the silly sovereign state mentality.
And bring lube for when Trump sends in federal troops to the Tiajuana border crossing and steps up ICE raids up to Orange County.
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards. -
California is only fucking rich because the federal government bankrolled all the critical junctures of your economis development. Quit being so god damned ungrateful. YOU DID NOT BUILD THAT!!CirrhosisDawg said:
Agree. Everyone agrees. Enforce federal law to your heart’s content. California is not interfering or impeding that. Golden staters however will not lift a finger or provide a single state dollar of support.YellowSnow said:<
Federales >>> States. US Grant - Appomattox, VA, April '65PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter. -
In fact the entire development of the (mostly arid) West was largely bankrolled by the Federal Government. Then the "rugged individualists" moved in--probably mere steps ahead of the law. Thus, the Tug is actually a result of government.YellowSnow said:
California is only fucking rich because the federal government bankrolled all the critical junctures of your economis development. Quit being so god damned ungrateful. YOU DID NOT BUILD THAT!!CirrhosisDawg said:
Agree. Everyone agrees. Enforce federal law to your heart’s content. California is not interfering or impeding that. Golden staters however will not lift a finger or provide a single state dollar of support.YellowSnow said:<
Federales >>> States. US Grant - Appomattox, VA, April '65PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter. -
The Aerospace and Space industry in California made Boeing and Washington look like pipersYellowSnow said:
California is only fucking rich because the federal government bankrolled all the critical junctures of your economis development. Quit being so god damned ungrateful. YOU DID NOT BUILD THAT!!CirrhosisDawg said:
Agree. Everyone agrees. Enforce federal law to your heart’s content. California is not interfering or impeding that. Golden staters however will not lift a finger or provide a single state dollar of support.YellowSnow said:<
Federales >>> States. US Grant - Appomattox, VA, April '65PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter.
-
White Trash!!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
Dialed-in as always!PurpleThrobber said:
If the typhus doesn’t get you first.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sounds TUFF! Any day now?PurpleThrobber said:
Roll over and say ‘uncle’.CirrhosisDawg said:
JFC, why can’t you take “yes” for an answer. California is complying with federal law in every step of the process. Just don’t ever expect our cooperation. How many times does it take for trumptards to accept that?PurpleThrobber said:YellowSnow said:<
Federales >>> States. US Grant - Appomattox, VA, April '65PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter.
I prefer the Sherman approach to educating the silly sovereign state mentality.
And bring lube for when Trump sends in federal troops to the Tiajuana border crossing and steps up ICE raids up to Orange County.
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
Low Skills!!!!
Trumptards!!!
Drunk at 2:30 on a Thursday because I sold another reverse mortgage!!!!! -
It's possible that w/o the cold war and the massive R&D spending that came with it and into SV, the Internets might not even exist yet. Ironic ain't it?HHusky said:
In fact the entire development of the (mostly arid) West was largely bankrolled by the Federal Government. Then the "rugged individualists" moved in--probably mere steps ahead of the law. Thus, the Tug is actually a result of government.YellowSnow said:
California is only fucking rich because the federal government bankrolled all the critical junctures of your economis development. Quit being so god damned ungrateful. YOU DID NOT BUILD THAT!!CirrhosisDawg said:
Agree. Everyone agrees. Enforce federal law to your heart’s content. California is not interfering or impeding that. Golden staters however will not lift a finger or provide a single state dollar of support.YellowSnow said:<
Federales >>> States. US Grant - Appomattox, VA, April '65PurpleThrobber said:CirrhosisDawg said:
Again, and read slowly this time, California has no obligation to enforce federal law. The sovereign state of California has broken no laws and is in full compliance with the constitution and federal statutes. How many times do you need to hear that before it sinks through your thick skull?Bendintheriver said:
You massive dumbass. If you have no obligation backing federal laws then you should have no problem not receiving federal funds. WTF is wrong with you?CirrhosisDawg said:
Great meltdown as always.Bendintheriver said:
Again, you are a massive idiot. California sued to keep their federal funding while ignoring our laws. WTF ?CirrhosisDawg said:
California has no obligation (financial, facilities, or personnel) to enforce federal law. Sounds like you have a problem with the trump administration.pawz said:
Those are contradictory terms.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sure. No one is stopping trump from enforcement. California is not going to cooperate with him though.pawz said:
Just like at the border?CirrhosisDawg said:
We are a nation of laws. If you and trump want to change them, you need to convince voters and Congress. Otherwise, the laws on the books need to be enforced.salemcoog said:
A loss for America is always a win for Team Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:Governing by EO sucks.
Ts&Ps on trump’s asylum policy yesterday, btw.
Celebrate!!!!
and El Oh El
Trump sued California to overturn our Sanctuary State laws. He and his white trash sycophants have lost every step of the way— twice at federal district level and once at the appeals court level. Sanctuary state laws prevail in the sovereign state of California.
Los Angeles sued the federal government when the trump administration penalized it in its public safety grant application for its sanctuary state law. The City stands to lose $2mm annually.
How much do you like your daily public humiliation?
I ❤️ the tug’s trumptards.
A federal trial court said the administration can rank grant recipients on local police policies and The City of Los Angeles could lose $2mm. Is this that hard for you and pawz to understand?
Nice play with words, CD. You are relatively correct, California is under no obligation to enforce federal law. Just as Arkansas, Alabama and Mississippi weren't directly obliged to enforce federal law in the 50's. But the federal laws sure as fuck were in force.
How'd that work out for the 'sovereignists' in Little Rock or Oxford? Federal law will be enforced in California whether CHIPS officers Poncherello and Baker do the arresting really doesn't matter. -
Is anyone other than @MikeDamone advocating the elimination of government? I mean we paid for it so its not some mythical visitor from space who paid for all this
America did so America did build it
If you don't think about half of what the government spends today is bullshit you should vote for the Squad
Those were actual investments and the duty of the government to protect the citizens.
Its a stupid argument which is why Obama came up with it
A lot of people are rugged individuals who built a lot of great things. Not everyone dreams of being a socialist drone
Go figure -
I'm all for BIG gubmint spending that actually increases productivity, gives us cool shit, and makes ALL of us wealthier. But @MikeDamone gets hung up on his precious Constitution and lectures me like I'm some dumbfuck.RaceBannon said:Is anyone other than @MikeDamone advocating the elimination of government? I mean we paid for it so its not some mythical visitor from space who paid for all this
America did so America did build it
If you don't think about half of what the government spends today is bullshit you should vote for the Squad
Those were actual investments and the duty of the government to protect the citizens.
Its a stupid argument which is why Obama came up with it
A lot of people are rugged individuals who built a lot of great things. Not everyone dreams of being a socialist drone
Go figure -
And now most of our spending goes to pay for grandma's hip replacement. I realize that's great for grandma, but what does that do for the General Welfare of the country?YellowSnow said:
I'm all for BIG gubmint spending that actually increases productivity, gives us cool shit, and makes ALL of us wealthier. But @MikeDamone gets hung up on his precious Constitution and lectures me like I'm some dumbfuck.RaceBannon said:Is anyone other than @MikeDamone advocating the elimination of government? I mean we paid for it so its not some mythical visitor from space who paid for all this
America did so America did build it
If you don't think about half of what the government spends today is bullshit you should vote for the Squad
Those were actual investments and the duty of the government to protect the citizens.
Its a stupid argument which is why Obama came up with it
A lot of people are rugged individuals who built a lot of great things. Not everyone dreams of being a socialist drone
Go figure -
Fuck @RaceBannon and his mobility scooter!! I ain't paying fo' it no mor.SFGbob said:
And now most of our spending goes to pay for grandma's hip replacement. I realize that's great for grandma, but what does that do for the General Welfare of the country?YellowSnow said:
I'm all for BIG gubmint spending that actually increases productivity, gives us cool shit, and makes ALL of us wealthier. But @MikeDamone gets hung up on his precious Constitution and lectures me like I'm some dumbfuck.RaceBannon said:Is anyone other than @MikeDamone advocating the elimination of government? I mean we paid for it so its not some mythical visitor from space who paid for all this
America did so America did build it
If you don't think about half of what the government spends today is bullshit you should vote for the Squad
Those were actual investments and the duty of the government to protect the citizens.
Its a stupid argument which is why Obama came up with it
A lot of people are rugged individuals who built a lot of great things. Not everyone dreams of being a socialist drone
Go figure
-
It's funny because it's true. Half of our Federal budget goes to pay for retirement and healthcare.YellowSnow said:
Fuck @RaceBannon and his mobility scooter!! I ain't paying fo' it no mor.SFGbob said:
And now most of our spending goes to pay for grandma's hip replacement. I realize that's great for grandma, but what does that do for the General Welfare of the country?YellowSnow said:
I'm all for BIG gubmint spending that actually increases productivity, gives us cool shit, and makes ALL of us wealthier. But @MikeDamone gets hung up on his precious Constitution and lectures me like I'm some dumbfuck.RaceBannon said:Is anyone other than @MikeDamone advocating the elimination of government? I mean we paid for it so its not some mythical visitor from space who paid for all this
America did so America did build it
If you don't think about half of what the government spends today is bullshit you should vote for the Squad
Those were actual investments and the duty of the government to protect the citizens.
Its a stupid argument which is why Obama came up with it
A lot of people are rugged individuals who built a lot of great things. Not everyone dreams of being a socialist drone
Go figure -
It's the great issue of our Tim- i.e., diverting an ever increasing share of our national wealth to keep olds comfy in retirement. And yet we spend all this energy arguing about shit like abortion that doesn't matter in the big scheme of things.SFGbob said:
It's funny because it's true. Half of our Federal budget goes to pay for retirement and healthcare.YellowSnow said:
Fuck @RaceBannon and his mobility scooter!! I ain't paying fo' it no mor.SFGbob said:
And now most of our spending goes to pay for grandma's hip replacement. I realize that's great for grandma, but what does that do for the General Welfare of the country?YellowSnow said:
I'm all for BIG gubmint spending that actually increases productivity, gives us cool shit, and makes ALL of us wealthier. But @MikeDamone gets hung up on his precious Constitution and lectures me like I'm some dumbfuck.RaceBannon said:Is anyone other than @MikeDamone advocating the elimination of government? I mean we paid for it so its not some mythical visitor from space who paid for all this
America did so America did build it
If you don't think about half of what the government spends today is bullshit you should vote for the Squad
Those were actual investments and the duty of the government to protect the citizens.
Its a stupid argument which is why Obama came up with it
A lot of people are rugged individuals who built a lot of great things. Not everyone dreams of being a socialist drone
Go figure -
Wait until the debt crisis hits, then will have people blaming the evil "rich" for not being willing to pay more of their "fair share."
This isn't sustainable and nobody wants to talk about it. -
As an old I agree with this
The problem is that SS was sold as your money being invested wisely by the government for your retirement. It wasn't. The entire health care delivery and insurance system is now fucked up from birth to death and nothing on the horizon looks very promising
We need a re set because I don't see means testing for benefits being politically possible. Rich people are rich because every penny counts and by God they put that money into SS and they want it back even if they use it to light their cigar.
White against Black, Boomer against Millennial, right against left. Its all a long con. That's something we boomers knew 50 years ago
And nothing changed
Hell were spending SS money to keep youngs high and on the couch doing Oxy watching Jerry Springer. Disability.
The deck is stacked against you. You need the government to help you. You can't build that. Join the DSA and get your piece of the pie!!
Stop SS now and stop taking money from the payroll workers and in 40 years maybe we have it fixed. Open up full throated competition in health care
Teach self reliance. The safety net isn't designed for half the country and millions more from other countries
Its fucking ludicrous as Mike Tyson might say
And insane and suicide -
We're going to get a re-set, but I don't think you're going to like it.RaceBannon said:As an old I agree with this
The problem is that SS was sold as your money being invested wisely by the government for your retirement. It wasn't. The entire health care delivery and insurance system is now fucked up from birth to death and nothing on the horizon looks very promising
We need a re set because I don't see means testing for benefits being politically possible. Rich people are rich because every penny counts and by God they put that money into SS and they want it back even if they use it to light their cigar.
White against Black, Boomer against Millennial, right against left. Its all a long con. That's something we boomers knew 50 years ago
And nothing changed
Hell were spending SS money to keep youngs high and on the couch doing Oxy watching Jerry Springer. Disability.
The deck is stacked against you. You need the government to help you. You can't build that. Join the DSA and get your piece of the pie!!
Stop SS now and stop taking money from the payroll workers and in 40 years maybe we have it fixed. Open up full throated competition in health care
Teach self reliance. The safety net isn't designed for half the country and millions more from other countries
Its fucking ludicrous as Mike Tyson might say
And insane and suicide -
You could take the income cap of Social Security with-holdings and bump the retirement age up a little up and kick the can down the road a little longer with Social Security. Medicare is the big dog and what will eventually bankrupt us.
What's going to happen is that our interest costs on the debt are going to continue to balloon and we're going to end up having to slash our military.
Look at England. All their money goes the National Health Service.