With Pete building the best OL that UW has seen since the 90s... is this his way at hinting that...
...he plans to keep his offense but wants to see how it works with an elite OL?
Comments
-
So if he didn't plan to keep his offense, he would recruit lesser linemen? Huh?
-
Okay, fair point.GreenRiverGatorz said:So if he didn't plan to keep his offense, he would recruit lesser linemen? Huh?
What I probably meant was that with UW getting the best OL in decades, he will be emboldened to keep his overly complicated offense to prove to the many doubting fans that his offense can indeed win an NC.
Though there is an 81% chance he'd keep is overly complicated offense anyway, even if we weren't getting the best OL in decades. -
It's his way of telling the TBS wannabes.... to shut the fuck up and let the adults handle football.
Whiney white boys from the chess team should stick to Google scholar reference chest-beating. -
MisterEm said:
It's his way of telling the TBS wannabes.... to shut the fuck up and let the adults handle football.
Whiney white boys from the chess team should stick to Google scholar reference chest-beating.
-
-
I think 2016 showed what Petersen's offense is capable of because we had quality talent at receiver. Since then, it's been JAGs at receiver and Browning shitting himself without wide open Ross to throw to so it's been a struggle. Give Petersen an elite O-line, elite QB, elite TEs, and elite WRs and his offense will probably dominate. If he does his fucking job and puts the talent on the field this season, the offense should immediately be better than last season.
-
I mean, if you give just about any retard an elite O-line, elite QB, elite TEs, and elite WRs their offense will dominate. We haven't had elite offensive talent the last two years, but we've had enough talent to play way better than we have.StrongArmCobra said:I think 2016 showed what Petersen's offense is capable of because we had quality talent at receiver. Since then, it's been JAGs at receiver and Browning shitting himself without wide open Ross to throw to so it's been a struggle. Give Petersen an elite O-line, elite QB, elite TEs, and elite WRs and his offense will probably dominate. If he does his fucking job and puts the talent on the field this season, the offense should immediately be better than last season.
But this year we have a physically elite QB who can make any throw. Not the noodle armed, socks shitter of the last four years. If we still suck this year on offense... it's all on Pete and his mensa offense.
-
I cant wait for the 2 yard line pitch option play calling #can’twait
-
One the biggest misnomers on this bored is CP’s “complicated” offense.Baphomet said:
Okay, fair point.GreenRiverGatorz said:So if he didn't plan to keep his offense, he would recruit lesser linemen? Huh?
What I probably meant was that with UW getting the best OL in decades, he will be emboldened to keep his overly complicated offense to prove to the many doubting fans that his offense can indeed win an NC.
Though there is an 81% chance he'd keep is overly complicated offense anyway, even if we weren't getting the best OL in decades.
TE’s trading sides, WRs shifting and RPO’s are not fucking complicated.
All offenses look complicated if the execution sucks. -
The only thing I am certain of is Eason utilizing the TE position like we have never seen.
-
Pete's offense is hot garbage and that won't change anytime soon. It's better than Oregon's, but that isn't saying much at all.
-
This is a contradiction in one sentence. Our WR talent and QB talent has been sub-par the past two seasons and our best pass catching threat, Hunter Bryant, has been battling a knee injury. Yes, there were some terrible play calls by Bush last season but that offense was not going to be much better than what it was with what we had to work with talent wise.guntlove said:
I mean, if you give just about any retard an elite O-line, elite QB, elite TEs, and elite WRs their offense will dominate. We haven't had elite offensive talent the last two years, but we've had enough talent to play way better than we have.StrongArmCobra said:I think 2016 showed what Petersen's offense is capable of because we had quality talent at receiver. Since then, it's been JAGs at receiver and Browning shitting himself without wide open Ross to throw to so it's been a struggle. Give Petersen an elite O-line, elite QB, elite TEs, and elite WRs and his offense will probably dominate. If he does his fucking job and puts the talent on the field this season, the offense should immediately be better than last season.
But this year we have a physically elite QB who can make any throw. Not the noodle armed, socks shitter of the last four years. If we still suck this year on offense... it's all on Pete and his mensa offense.
I agree, IF the offense sucks this season it's Petersen fault. Duh. But the chances of it sucking are low with the talent we have to work with now. -
Salty Em is best EmMisterEm said:It's his way of telling the TBS wannabes.... to shut the fuck up and let the adults handle football.
Whiney white boys from the chess team should stick to Google scholar reference chest-beating. -
So maybe unnecessarily ‘busy’ or ‘cute’ is a better way to describe it? I don’t know... perhaps all the pre-snap motioning just makes it seem more complicated than it actually is. I do know Pete said at the end of last season that he would look to simplify the offense before this season. Not sure what that’s gonna look like... I guess we’ll see. EWIWBI.TacoSoup said:
One the biggest misnomers on this bored is CP’s “complicated” offense.Baphomet said:
Okay, fair point.GreenRiverGatorz said:So if he didn't plan to keep his offense, he would recruit lesser linemen? Huh?
What I probably meant was that with UW getting the best OL in decades, he will be emboldened to keep his overly complicated offense to prove to the many doubting fans that his offense can indeed win an NC.
Though there is an 81% chance he'd keep is overly complicated offense anyway, even if we weren't getting the best OL in decades.
TE’s trading sides, WRs shifting and RPO’s are not fucking complicated.
All offenses look complicated if the execution sucks. -
2016 offense was largely awful against good defenses. USC. Colorado. Alabama. Utah was fits and starts but better. Remember we got Stanford with consecutive road games and both of their starting DBs out. Oregon was historically bad on defense.StrongArmCobra said:I think 2016 showed what Petersen's offense is capable of because we had quality talent at receiver. Since then, it's been JAGs at receiver and Browning shitting himself without wide open Ross to throw to so it's been a struggle. Give Petersen an elite O-line, elite QB, elite TEs, and elite WRs and his offense will probably dominate. If he does his fucking job and puts the talent on the field this season, the offense should immediately be better than last season.
-
Jimmys and Joes over Xs and Os
-
Colorado wasn't entirely accurate. Running game great. Passing game completely broken.
-
Greasy take.oregonblitzkrieg said:Pete's offense is hot garbage and that won't change anytime soon. It's better than Oregon's, but that isn't saying much at all.
-
Entire 2016 offense can be summed up in one play that game.Gladstone said:Colorado wasn't entirely accurate. Running game great. Passing game completely broken.
Browning panics, tries to throw it away, looks to be pick 6 material, Ross leaps and one hand snags the noodle arm throw and takes it for an improbable touchdown.
https://youtu.be/2F0yNDWfcDI -
TacoSoup said:
One the biggest misnomers on this bored is CP’s “complicated” offense.Baphomet said:
Okay, fair point.GreenRiverGatorz said:So if he didn't plan to keep his offense, he would recruit lesser linemen? Huh?
What I probably meant was that with UW getting the best OL in decades, he will be emboldened to keep his overly complicated offense to prove to the many doubting fans that his offense can indeed win an NC.
Though there is an 81% chance he'd keep is overly complicated offense anyway, even if we weren't getting the best OL in decades.
TE’s trading sides, WRs shifting and RPO’s are not fucking complicated.
All offenses look complicated if the execution sucks.
The motion isn’t the complicated part. That’s the misnomer. It’s the intricate and multiple blocking/protection schemes and reads by the QB that make things hard. -
We were an RPO offense last season. Brownsocks had to count + read a defender and make a choice. Every non-triple school in the country runs them. Our? QB made shit reads + Bush was inconsistent.NLdawg said:TacoSoup said:
One the biggest misnomers on this bored is CP’s “complicated” offense.Baphomet said:
Okay, fair point.GreenRiverGatorz said:So if he didn't plan to keep his offense, he would recruit lesser linemen? Huh?
What I probably meant was that with UW getting the best OL in decades, he will be emboldened to keep his overly complicated offense to prove to the many doubting fans that his offense can indeed win an NC.
Though there is an 81% chance he'd keep is overly complicated offense anyway, even if we weren't getting the best OL in decades.
TE’s trading sides, WRs shifting and RPO’s are not fucking complicated.
All offenses look complicated if the execution sucks.
The motion isn’t the complicated part. That’s the misnomer. It’s the intricate and multiple blocking/protection schemes and reads by the QB that make things hard.
UW is not Air Raid-ian levels of simplicity but it isn’t that complicated -
Right.guntlove said:
So maybe unnecessarily ‘busy’ or ‘cute’ is a better way to describe it? I don’t know... perhaps all the pre-snap motioning just makes it seem more complicated than it actually is. I do know Pete said at the end of last season that he would look to simplify the offense before this season. Not sure what that’s gonna look like... I guess we’ll see. EWIWBI.TacoSoup said:
One the biggest misnomers on this bored is CP’s “complicated” offense.Baphomet said:
Okay, fair point.GreenRiverGatorz said:So if he didn't plan to keep his offense, he would recruit lesser linemen? Huh?
What I probably meant was that with UW getting the best OL in decades, he will be emboldened to keep his overly complicated offense to prove to the many doubting fans that his offense can indeed win an NC.
Though there is an 81% chance he'd keep is overly complicated offense anyway, even if we weren't getting the best OL in decades.
TE’s trading sides, WRs shifting and RPO’s are not fucking complicated.
All offenses look complicated if the execution sucks.
I took simplify as meaning a more “focused” approach to the offense... As in, clearly defining what we? want to be as an offense and how we? want to do it.
The concepts we teach aren’t THAT complicated. It’s how they’ve been applied is what has held us back IMO -
I might be the minority of one, but I like “we don’t have an offense, we run plays” thing.
-
I don’t really care what offense we run as long as we can execute the plays and understand that sticking with the run is our best bet in most situations. I got sick of watching us predictably abandon the run when we were winning the game and needed to manage the clock. And when we did run the ball, we got bailed out by Gaskin’s ability to break tackles because it was some slow to develop bullshit. I like a delayed handoff when it works, but it seemed like every play was out of the shotgun or pistol formation and there was too much dicking around in the backfield. I’d rather see us hit the line fast 81% of the time, and dare I say, use a fucking lead blocker more often.
-
I don’t totally disagree, just pointing out that the shifts/motions aren’t the complexities that cause us problems.TacoSoup said:
We were an RPO offense last season. Brownsocks had to count + read a defender and make a choice. Every non-triple school in the country runs them. Our? QB made shit reads + Bush was inconsistent.NLdawg said:TacoSoup said:
One the biggest misnomers on this bored is CP’s “complicated” offense.Baphomet said:
Okay, fair point.GreenRiverGatorz said:So if he didn't plan to keep his offense, he would recruit lesser linemen? Huh?
What I probably meant was that with UW getting the best OL in decades, he will be emboldened to keep his overly complicated offense to prove to the many doubting fans that his offense can indeed win an NC.
Though there is an 81% chance he'd keep is overly complicated offense anyway, even if we weren't getting the best OL in decades.
TE’s trading sides, WRs shifting and RPO’s are not fucking complicated.
All offenses look complicated if the execution sucks.
The motion isn’t the complicated part. That’s the misnomer. It’s the intricate and multiple blocking/protection schemes and reads by the QB that make things hard.
UW is not Air Raid-ian levels of simplicity but it isn’t that complicated
-
J?PurpleJ said:I don’t really care what offense we run as long as we can execute the plays and understand that sticking with the run is our best bet in most situations. I got sick of watching us predictably abandon the run when we were winning the game and needed to manage the clock. And when we did run the ball, we got bailed out by Gaskin’s ability to break tackles because it was some slow to develop bullshit. I like a delayed handoff when it works, but it seemed like every play was out of the shotgun or pistol formation and there was too much dicking around in the backfield. I’d rather see us hit the line fast 81% of the time, and dare I say, use a fucking lead blocker more often.
-
Oh and one more thing...
If you’re going to run the option, please for the luv of all the cute kittens and puppies in the world, make sure that the QB understands how to read the end and make the correct decision of whether to pitch or keep. -
-
Or better yet, change out of it presnap when defense is cheated playside.PurpleJ said:Oh and one more thing...
If you’re going to run the option, please for the luv of all the cute kittens and puppies in the world, make sure that the QB understands how to read the end and make the correct decision of whether to pitch or keep. -
Yeah and run a quick slant right behind those motherfuckers. Or flip the play call.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Or better yet, change out of it presnap when defense is cheated playside.PurpleJ said:Oh and one more thing...
If you’re going to run the option, please for the luv of all the cute kittens and puppies in the world, make sure that the QB understands how to read the end and make the correct decision of whether to pitch or keep.
