Tax on ultra wealthy
Comments
-
I'm taking bets bitch! How much shall I put you down for?HHusky said:
Just trying to reconcile alleged facts with reality. I’m also willing to believe the alleged facts were simply lies.salemcoog said:
There we go. Not only do you hate white people. You also hate men.HHusky said:
More likely, the ex-wife got the past due child support.RaceBannon said:Hondo does the guy's taxes
Being an indoctrinated self loathing snob is no way to go through life son.
But then you already know this. -
Hello? McFlys? -
I'll bet you $1,000 you didn't see a check for a $100,000 bonus with 6.2% social security withheld. Unless the check was in January, that's literally impossible.Sledog said:
Really what are the rates know it all? Everything I said is true. I'm not a lying turd like you.2001400ex said:
Sledog said 6.2% social security which is impossible. He made the shit up.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Jesus, if you really are an accountant you've gotta be the worst fucking one that I've ever talked to. I already gave you a very reasonable and easy explanation. Yes, withholding can be higher than the effective rate on bonuses for a variety of reasons. I've had it happen, was pissed, and had to go get an explanation of why it happened.2001400ex said:
Now I know you just completely made that story up. You just outed yourself dumbfuck.Sledog said:
Oh and how do you figure that?HHusky said:
Either an apocryphal tale or there’s a piece of information missing.Sledog said:Guy I know just got a bonus check for 100k in Cali. His check after taxes was 41,300.00 The government's shouldn't get more than the worker. Ever.
37% federal, 13% state, 1.45% Medicare , 1% disability, 6.2% social security.
58.65%
That's fucking Kalifornia and the feds.
To be in the 37% tax bracket, your income has to be over $400k. And social security ends under $130k.
But remember, sledog is not known as a liar.
Also, are we really arguing over if something along 49% vs. 58% makes it too much? Both are too fucking much. Fucking Christ, the colonists revolted over less than 5% of their income going to taxes.
Well I'd say if you don't want to pay 49% don't live in California. That's 10-13% top rate or whatever. Fuck that. In Washington, it would be about 40%. Unless the income is derived from capital gains. Then it's 20%.
Seriously. The person that gets screwed for taxes in this country is the person making $200k to $500k a year from a wage.
I could provide proof but you'll have to pay if I do. Say $1000.00? More? -
Check was very recent. OK where we meeting. Bring cash. Show cash and I'll show you my proof. You're in Spokane right? Tomorrow? I'll have cash. Unless my math is wrong $6,200.00 is 6.2% of 100,000.00.2001400ex said:
I'll bet you $1,000 you didn't see a check for a $100,000 bonus with 6.2% social security withheld. Unless the check was in January, that's literally impossible.Sledog said:
Really what are the rates know it all? Everything I said is true. I'm not a lying turd like you.2001400ex said:
Sledog said 6.2% social security which is impossible. He made the shit up.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Jesus, if you really are an accountant you've gotta be the worst fucking one that I've ever talked to. I already gave you a very reasonable and easy explanation. Yes, withholding can be higher than the effective rate on bonuses for a variety of reasons. I've had it happen, was pissed, and had to go get an explanation of why it happened.2001400ex said:
Now I know you just completely made that story up. You just outed yourself dumbfuck.Sledog said:
Oh and how do you figure that?HHusky said:
Either an apocryphal tale or there’s a piece of information missing.Sledog said:Guy I know just got a bonus check for 100k in Cali. His check after taxes was 41,300.00 The government's shouldn't get more than the worker. Ever.
37% federal, 13% state, 1.45% Medicare , 1% disability, 6.2% social security.
58.65%
That's fucking Kalifornia and the feds.
To be in the 37% tax bracket, your income has to be over $400k. And social security ends under $130k.
But remember, sledog is not known as a liar.
Also, are we really arguing over if something along 49% vs. 58% makes it too much? Both are too fucking much. Fucking Christ, the colonists revolted over less than 5% of their income going to taxes.
Well I'd say if you don't want to pay 49% don't live in California. That's 10-13% top rate or whatever. Fuck that. In Washington, it would be about 40%. Unless the income is derived from capital gains. Then it's 20%.
Seriously. The person that gets screwed for taxes in this country is the person making $200k to $500k a year from a wage.
I could provide proof but you'll have to pay if I do. Say $1000.00? More?
You bringing HH? I can cover a lot more than a grand. -
Whatever was withheld , your pal wasn’t taxed at 59% on it. To say otherwise is retarded. I’m not going to take your money, Mall Cop.
-
If his base was maybe $5K per month for Jan through May, it's possible to get a $100K check in June and still be under the $132,900 threshold for FICA withholding.2001400ex said:
I'll bet you $1,000 you didn't see a check for a $100,000 bonus with 6.2% social security withheld. Unless the check was in January, that's literally impossible.Sledog said:
Really what are the rates know it all? Everything I said is true. I'm not a lying turd like you.2001400ex said:
Sledog said 6.2% social security which is impossible. He made the shit up.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Jesus, if you really are an accountant you've gotta be the worst fucking one that I've ever talked to. I already gave you a very reasonable and easy explanation. Yes, withholding can be higher than the effective rate on bonuses for a variety of reasons. I've had it happen, was pissed, and had to go get an explanation of why it happened.2001400ex said:
Now I know you just completely made that story up. You just outed yourself dumbfuck.Sledog said:
Oh and how do you figure that?HHusky said:
Either an apocryphal tale or there’s a piece of information missing.Sledog said:Guy I know just got a bonus check for 100k in Cali. His check after taxes was 41,300.00 The government's shouldn't get more than the worker. Ever.
37% federal, 13% state, 1.45% Medicare , 1% disability, 6.2% social security.
58.65%
That's fucking Kalifornia and the feds.
To be in the 37% tax bracket, your income has to be over $400k. And social security ends under $130k.
But remember, sledog is not known as a liar.
Also, are we really arguing over if something along 49% vs. 58% makes it too much? Both are too fucking much. Fucking Christ, the colonists revolted over less than 5% of their income going to taxes.
Well I'd say if you don't want to pay 49% don't live in California. That's 10-13% top rate or whatever. Fuck that. In Washington, it would be about 40%. Unless the income is derived from capital gains. Then it's 20%.
Seriously. The person that gets screwed for taxes in this country is the person making $200k to $500k a year from a wage.
I could provide proof but you'll have to pay if I do. Say $1000.00? More?
Not very likely - but definitely not 'literally impossible'....which, by the way, you should check yo'self on the use of 'literally' without absolute certainty.
#syntaxsuperiorityguy
Also, if he's following the withholding tables, he'll get figuratively fucked on the Fed Tax Withheld as that is based on an annualized as if he was getting that amount monthly or bi-weekly. Dude should have been in giving the payroll clerk his big salomi and axing her to override the withholding amount one time.
-
No bet HH? Who's the retard if you're turning down a sure win?HHusky said:Whatever was withheld , your pal wasn’t taxed at 59% on it. To say otherwise is retarded. I’m not going to take your money, Mall Cop.
-
I'm in Vermont at the moment. But yes, bring the check and stub to Spokane on Thursday. I'll be there.Sledog said:
Check was very recent. OK where we meeting. Bring cash. Show cash and I'll show you my proof. You're in Spokane right? Tomorrow? I'll have cash. Unless my math is wrong $6,200.00 is 6.2% of 100,000.00.2001400ex said:
I'll bet you $1,000 you didn't see a check for a $100,000 bonus with 6.2% social security withheld. Unless the check was in January, that's literally impossible.Sledog said:
Really what are the rates know it all? Everything I said is true. I'm not a lying turd like you.2001400ex said:
Sledog said 6.2% social security which is impossible. He made the shit up.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Jesus, if you really are an accountant you've gotta be the worst fucking one that I've ever talked to. I already gave you a very reasonable and easy explanation. Yes, withholding can be higher than the effective rate on bonuses for a variety of reasons. I've had it happen, was pissed, and had to go get an explanation of why it happened.2001400ex said:
Now I know you just completely made that story up. You just outed yourself dumbfuck.Sledog said:
Oh and how do you figure that?HHusky said:
Either an apocryphal tale or there’s a piece of information missing.Sledog said:Guy I know just got a bonus check for 100k in Cali. His check after taxes was 41,300.00 The government's shouldn't get more than the worker. Ever.
37% federal, 13% state, 1.45% Medicare , 1% disability, 6.2% social security.
58.65%
That's fucking Kalifornia and the feds.
To be in the 37% tax bracket, your income has to be over $400k. And social security ends under $130k.
But remember, sledog is not known as a liar.
Also, are we really arguing over if something along 49% vs. 58% makes it too much? Both are too fucking much. Fucking Christ, the colonists revolted over less than 5% of their income going to taxes.
Well I'd say if you don't want to pay 49% don't live in California. That's 10-13% top rate or whatever. Fuck that. In Washington, it would be about 40%. Unless the income is derived from capital gains. Then it's 20%.
Seriously. The person that gets screwed for taxes in this country is the person making $200k to $500k a year from a wage.
I could provide proof but you'll have to pay if I do. Say $1000.00? More?
You bringing HH? I can cover a lot more than a grand. -
Yes you are correct. But what person do you know makes $60k a year and gets a bonus in June for $100k? You could say a small business owner with a C Corp election. But then you wouldn't bonus yourself, you'd do a distribution and no taxes would be withheld. Or if they were withheld. They wouldn't be employment taxes. That's the whole point of the c Corp election.PurpleThrobber said:
If his base was maybe $5K per month for Jan through May, it's possible to get a $100K check in June and still be under the $132,900 threshold for FICA withholding.2001400ex said:
I'll bet you $1,000 you didn't see a check for a $100,000 bonus with 6.2% social security withheld. Unless the check was in January, that's literally impossible.Sledog said:
Really what are the rates know it all? Everything I said is true. I'm not a lying turd like you.2001400ex said:
Sledog said 6.2% social security which is impossible. He made the shit up.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Jesus, if you really are an accountant you've gotta be the worst fucking one that I've ever talked to. I already gave you a very reasonable and easy explanation. Yes, withholding can be higher than the effective rate on bonuses for a variety of reasons. I've had it happen, was pissed, and had to go get an explanation of why it happened.2001400ex said:
Now I know you just completely made that story up. You just outed yourself dumbfuck.Sledog said:
Oh and how do you figure that?HHusky said:
Either an apocryphal tale or there’s a piece of information missing.Sledog said:Guy I know just got a bonus check for 100k in Cali. His check after taxes was 41,300.00 The government's shouldn't get more than the worker. Ever.
37% federal, 13% state, 1.45% Medicare , 1% disability, 6.2% social security.
58.65%
That's fucking Kalifornia and the feds.
To be in the 37% tax bracket, your income has to be over $400k. And social security ends under $130k.
But remember, sledog is not known as a liar.
Also, are we really arguing over if something along 49% vs. 58% makes it too much? Both are too fucking much. Fucking Christ, the colonists revolted over less than 5% of their income going to taxes.
Well I'd say if you don't want to pay 49% don't live in California. That's 10-13% top rate or whatever. Fuck that. In Washington, it would be about 40%. Unless the income is derived from capital gains. Then it's 20%.
Seriously. The person that gets screwed for taxes in this country is the person making $200k to $500k a year from a wage.
I could provide proof but you'll have to pay if I do. Say $1000.00? More?
Not very likely - but definitely not 'literally impossible'....which, by the way, you should check yo'self on the use of 'literally' without absolute certainty.
#syntaxsuperiorityguy
Also, if he's following the withholding tables, he'll get figuratively fucked on the Fed Tax Withheld as that is based on an annualized as if he was getting that amount monthly or bi-weekly. Dude should have been in giving the payroll clerk his big salomi and axing her to override the withholding amount one time. -
Imagine not understanding c corps.2001400ex said:
Yes you are correct. But what person do you know makes $60k a year and gets a bonus in June for $100k? You could say a small business owner with a C Corp election. But then you wouldn't bonus yourself, you'd do a distribution and no taxes would be withheld. Or if they were withheld. They wouldn't be employment taxes. That's the whole point of the c Corp election.PurpleThrobber said:
If his base was maybe $5K per month for Jan through May, it's possible to get a $100K check in June and still be under the $132,900 threshold for FICA withholding.2001400ex said:
I'll bet you $1,000 you didn't see a check for a $100,000 bonus with 6.2% social security withheld. Unless the check was in January, that's literally impossible.Sledog said:
Really what are the rates know it all? Everything I said is true. I'm not a lying turd like you.2001400ex said:
Sledog said 6.2% social security which is impossible. He made the shit up.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Jesus, if you really are an accountant you've gotta be the worst fucking one that I've ever talked to. I already gave you a very reasonable and easy explanation. Yes, withholding can be higher than the effective rate on bonuses for a variety of reasons. I've had it happen, was pissed, and had to go get an explanation of why it happened.2001400ex said:
Now I know you just completely made that story up. You just outed yourself dumbfuck.Sledog said:
Oh and how do you figure that?HHusky said:
Either an apocryphal tale or there’s a piece of information missing.Sledog said:Guy I know just got a bonus check for 100k in Cali. His check after taxes was 41,300.00 The government's shouldn't get more than the worker. Ever.
37% federal, 13% state, 1.45% Medicare , 1% disability, 6.2% social security.
58.65%
That's fucking Kalifornia and the feds.
To be in the 37% tax bracket, your income has to be over $400k. And social security ends under $130k.
But remember, sledog is not known as a liar.
Also, are we really arguing over if something along 49% vs. 58% makes it too much? Both are too fucking much. Fucking Christ, the colonists revolted over less than 5% of their income going to taxes.
Well I'd say if you don't want to pay 49% don't live in California. That's 10-13% top rate or whatever. Fuck that. In Washington, it would be about 40%. Unless the income is derived from capital gains. Then it's 20%.
Seriously. The person that gets screwed for taxes in this country is the person making $200k to $500k a year from a wage.
I could provide proof but you'll have to pay if I do. Say $1000.00? More?
Not very likely - but definitely not 'literally impossible'....which, by the way, you should check yo'self on the use of 'literally' without absolute certainty.
#syntaxsuperiorityguy
Also, if he's following the withholding tables, he'll get figuratively fucked on the Fed Tax Withheld as that is based on an annualized as if he was getting that amount monthly or bi-weekly. Dude should have been in giving the payroll clerk his big salomi and axing her to override the withholding amount one time.
Good god you’re an idiot.



