Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Coaches and Scouts view on UW

2456

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,234
    edited June 2019

    The biggest key will be getting Eason to live up to his hype. If he does that, they should be in the Playoffs, but if he doesn't, it could be a long season.


    We went to back to back NY6 Bowls w/ a QB that threw 19 & 16 TD Passes. If Eason can give us 25 we will go undefeated. If everything clicks and he goes for 30-35+ TD's we will win a playoff game. To me Teq, it is all about the Red Zone. We have had no problem moving the ball in between the 20's but the RZ is a different story. This is where Bryant/Jones/Spiker/Osborne I think will be the difference w/ Eason.

    I tend to agree.

    I think the biggest difference between Eason and Browning is just the fact that Eason can stretch the field much more effectively and that should break more big plays.

    To your point on the red zone, the hope and expectation would be that Eason will be able to make throws into tight windows that Browning could only dream of making against elite athletes.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,819 Swaye's Wigwam
    The only stupid part was the reference to injured receivers in the spring. Fuller, Pounds, and Jones, right? Addition by subtraction aside from Jones, who needs to step up his game this season.

    I think Tryon gets double digit sacks rather easily. I disagree with Teq about his ceiling. Hes a 6'5" wide receiver who put on Like 40 pounds of muscle and still looks and moves like a wr. He doesn't have a ceiling.

    Eason gets the preseason to get his cofidance going. He'll be fine. The Cal game is the big tester though. If UW mops the floor with them, and Eason goes something like 18/25 with a lot of check downs but a long TD or two thrown in, playoffs are in the picture. If that game is a struggle then a hard fought 10-2 and shot at another premium bowl are best case.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,688

    Lmao some of these comments. Looks like we might steal the offseason natty crown back from Oregon this summer.

    Until Pete and Bush can prove they can run an intimidating offense, they cant

    So speaks the pgos
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited June 2019
    I’m skeptical that they will be as good as predicted (pac 12 champs). Losing 10 on defense and the best RB is school history and have no drop off? I don’t see it. This is an 8 or 9 win team.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,755 Founders Club

    I’m skeptical that they will be as good as predicted (pac 12 champs). Losing 10 on defense and the best RB is school history and have no drop off? I don’t see it. This is an 8 or 9 win team.

    Jeezus Damone, you sound like fucking Pumpeii.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,688
    Hes a qb under Peterman .

    I’m skeptical that they will be as good as predicted (pac 12 champs). Losing 10 on defense and the best RB is school history and have no drop off? I don’t see it. This is an 8 or 9 win team.

    Jeezus Damone, you sound like fucking Pumpeii.
    8-4 > 8-4