The Hell? 1 WR and 5 OL

Comments

• 2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

  February 2014

  http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=9&c=16&yr=2013
  
  Crazy how we loaded up on WRs a couple years. We did have more OL recruits than I recall tho.

  -6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,870

  February 2014

  NeGgaPlEaSe said:

  Seriously what the fuck is Pete doing? Obviously he learned nothing from Sark on how to win in the PAC 12

  It's simple - Petersen can't recruit.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754

  February 2014 edited February 2014

  Burleson will be the 6th.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Steve_Bowman Member Posts: 442

  February 2014 edited February 2014

  Yes, he can't recruit. Why do we need so many of those big ole smelly boys?
  
  You can never have to many wideouts!

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• SpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,454

  February 2014

  I'll be breaking in my new Superbowl XLVIII Champion sweatpants in my mom's basement tomorrow morning waiting on the Baker announcement.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389

  February 2014

  NeGgaPlEaSe said:

  Seriously what the fuck is Pete doing? Obviously he learned nothing from Sark on how to win in the PAC 12

  You're partially right, but it's also obvious that CP and staff have looked at the film and the depth chart that Sark left behind and know there's work to be done on both lines. I'm fairly certain that the new coaches didn't need Pac-12 experience to know how to evaluate film.
  
  

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter