Possible glitch regarding WTFs

I have heard from a poster that he cannot see who is giving posts a WTF. I just looked at some posts and I can see the WTFs and who gave them.

Is anyone else not able to see which posters are giving WTFs?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

GreenRiverGatorz

BTW, I think this WTF crisis is the handywork of @CrazyLarry. This shit started as soon as he arrived. Coincidence? I think not.

His historic ratio broke the WTF

PurpleBaze

BTW, I think this WTF crisis is the handywork of @CrazyLarry. This shit started as soon as he arrived. Coincidence? I think not.
His historic ratio broke the WTF

That's crazy!

FireCohen

It’s sad to see how far this bored has fallen
Was a short fall
Why don't you start your own hobby bored than jerkface?

Maybe I will, I will call it bowdowntowashington

Pitchfork51

The threats are getting serious up in here

Time for a duel

Swaye

The threats are getting serious up in here

Time for a duel

Swaye

@GrundleStiltzkin I can see your WTF and it makes me sad.

Swaye

@GrundleStiltzkin I just realized you are WTFing every post in this thread and now my avergae is fuct for lyfe. First Sven, and now you. It hurts. It hurts bad.

GrundleStiltzkin

A squeaky bug gets a-fixin

Swaye

A squeaky bug gets a-fixin

GrundleStiltzkin

The threats are getting serious up in here

Time for a duel

This JIF is actually teh teets, but you know

Doog_de_Jour

@GrundleStiltzkin I just realized you are WTFing every post in this thread and now my avergae is fuct for lyfe. First Sven, and now you. It hurts. It hurts bad.

Grundle is just testing the functionality of the site for Vanilla.

...aaannnnndddd I’ve just earned myself another WTF!

PurpleBaze

@GrundleStiltzkin I just realized you are WTFing every post in this thread and now my avergae is fuct for lyfe. First Sven, and now you. It hurts. It hurts bad.
Grundle is just testing the functionality of the site for Vanilla.

...aaannnnndddd I’ve just earned myself another WTF!

You still only have 61 WTFs. You missed Spooge's WTF-fest where he gave a bunch of us 200+ WTFs in the span of an hour and a half. It was impressive and psychotic all rolled into one.

Fuck you Grundle, ya bearded cunt ya.

DerekJohnson

Here's the message I received from Vanilla. I replied that I hope they can reverse it back. I said that our community has no such hang ups about playful retaliation.

Hey Derek,

Users that negatively reacted to posts were always suppose to be hidden - them being revealed for a while was a bug that we recently patched. Only mods/admins should be able to see that information now. This allows users to anonymously flag posts/comments that they think are irrelevant or bad and prevents the original poster from retaliating against users that downvote them.

PurpleBaze

Here's the message I received from Vanilla. I replied that I hope they can reverse it back. I said that our community has no such hang ups about playful retaliation.

Hey Derek,

Users that negatively reacted to posts were always suppose to be hidden - them being revealed for a while was a bug that we recently patched. Only mods/admins should be able to see that information now. This allows users to anonymously flag posts/comments that they think are irrelevant or bad and prevents the original poster from retaliating against users that downvote them.

Jesus H!

Put the bug back in.

Doog_de_Jour

Here's the message I received from Vanilla. I replied that I hope they can reverse it back. I said that our community has no such hang ups about playful retaliation.

Hey Derek,

Users that negatively reacted to posts were always suppose to be hidden - them being revealed for a while was a bug that we recently patched. Only mods/admins should be able to see that information now. This allows users to anonymously flag posts/comments that they think are irrelevant or bad and prevents the original poster from retaliating against users that downvote them.

While well intentioned, I also think this way of thinking is deeply flawed. I appreciate the transparency, and site admins should be able to determine what features are turned off.

dirtysouwfdawg

Here's the message I received from Vanilla. I replied that I hope they can reverse it back. I said that our community has no such hang ups about playful retaliation.

Hey Derek,

Users that negatively reacted to posts were always suppose to be hidden - them being revealed for a while was a bug that we recently patched. Only mods/admins should be able to see that information now. This allows users to anonymously flag posts/comments that they think are irrelevant or bad and prevents the original poster from retaliating against users that downvote them.

Swaye

Here's the message I received from Vanilla. I replied that I hope they can reverse it back. I said that our community has no such hang ups about playful retaliation.

Hey Derek,

Users that negatively reacted to posts were always suppose to be hidden - them being revealed for a while was a bug that we recently patched. Only mods/admins should be able to see that information now. This allows users to anonymously flag posts/comments that they think are irrelevant or bad and prevents the original poster from retaliating against users that downvote them.

Wait a minute! Does this mean all of Hondo's poasts will now be visible??!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?! Motherfuckme! That is NOT a world I want to live in.

1to392831weretaken

So does Vanilla not have a control panel from which you, as the site owner, can turn such features on and off?

PurpleBaze

So does Vanilla not have a control panel from which you, as the site owner, can turn such features on and off?

Clearly Vanilla does not work for Derek.

BennyBeaver

Here's the message I received from Vanilla. I replied that I hope they can reverse it back. I said that our community has no such hang ups about playful retaliation.

Hey Derek,

Users that negatively reacted to posts were always suppose to be hidden - them being revealed for a while was a bug that we recently patched. Only mods/admins should be able to see that information now. This allows users to anonymously flag posts/comments that they think are irrelevant or bad and prevents the original poster from retaliating against users that downvote them.
While well intentioned, I also think this way of thinking is deeply flawed. I appreciate the transparency, and site admins should be able to determine what features are turned off.

chintentioned