Possible glitch regarding WTFs
Comments
-
Grundle is just testing the functionality of the site for Vanilla.Swaye said:@GrundleStiltzkin I just realized you are WTFing every post in this thread and now my avergae is fuct for lyfe. First Sven, and now you. It hurts. It hurts bad.
...aaannnnndddd I’ve just earned myself another WTF! -
You still only have 61 WTFs. You missed Spooge's WTF-fest where he gave a bunch of us 200+ WTFs in the span of an hour and a half. It was impressive and psychotic all rolled into one.Doog_de_Jour said:
Grundle is just testing the functionality of the site for Vanilla.Swaye said:@GrundleStiltzkin I just realized you are WTFing every post in this thread and now my avergae is fuct for lyfe. First Sven, and now you. It hurts. It hurts bad.
...aaannnnndddd I’ve just earned myself another WTF!
Fuck you Grundle, ya bearded cunt ya. -
Here's the message I received from Vanilla. I replied that I hope they can reverse it back. I said that our community has no such hang ups about playful retaliation.
Hey Derek,
Users that negatively reacted to posts were always suppose to be hidden - them being revealed for a while was a bug that we recently patched. Only mods/admins should be able to see that information now. This allows users to anonymously flag posts/comments that they think are irrelevant or bad and prevents the original poster from retaliating against users that downvote them. -
Jesus H!DerekJohnson said:Here's the message I received from Vanilla. I replied that I hope they can reverse it back. I said that our community has no such hang ups about playful retaliation.
Hey Derek,
Users that negatively reacted to posts were always suppose to be hidden - them being revealed for a while was a bug that we recently patched. Only mods/admins should be able to see that information now. This allows users to anonymously flag posts/comments that they think are irrelevant or bad and prevents the original poster from retaliating against users that downvote them.
Put the bug back in. -
While well intentioned, I also think this way of thinking is deeply flawed. I appreciate the transparency, and site admins should be able to determine what features are turned off.DerekJohnson said:Here's the message I received from Vanilla. I replied that I hope they can reverse it back. I said that our community has no such hang ups about playful retaliation.
Hey Derek,
Users that negatively reacted to posts were always suppose to be hidden - them being revealed for a while was a bug that we recently patched. Only mods/admins should be able to see that information now. This allows users to anonymously flag posts/comments that they think are irrelevant or bad and prevents the original poster from retaliating against users that downvote them. -
DerekJohnson said:
Here's the message I received from Vanilla. I replied that I hope they can reverse it back. I said that our community has no such hang ups about playful retaliation.
Hey Derek,
Users that negatively reacted to posts were always suppose to be hidden - them being revealed for a while was a bug that we recently patched. Only mods/admins should be able to see that information now. This allows users to anonymously flag posts/comments that they think are irrelevant or bad and prevents the original poster from retaliating against users that downvote them.
-
Wait a minute! Does this mean all of Hondo's poasts will now be visible??!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?! Motherfuckme! That is NOT a world I want to live in.DerekJohnson said:Here's the message I received from Vanilla. I replied that I hope they can reverse it back. I said that our community has no such hang ups about playful retaliation.
Hey Derek,
Users that negatively reacted to posts were always suppose to be hidden - them being revealed for a while was a bug that we recently patched. Only mods/admins should be able to see that information now. This allows users to anonymously flag posts/comments that they think are irrelevant or bad and prevents the original poster from retaliating against users that downvote them. -
So does Vanilla not have a control panel from which you, as the site owner, can turn such features on and off?
-
Clearly Vanilla does not work for Derek.1to392831weretaken said:So does Vanilla not have a control panel from which you, as the site owner, can turn such features on and off?
-
chintentionedDoog_de_Jour said:
While well intentioned, I also think this way of thinking is deeply flawed. I appreciate the transparency, and site admins should be able to determine what features are turned off.DerekJohnson said:Here's the message I received from Vanilla. I replied that I hope they can reverse it back. I said that our community has no such hang ups about playful retaliation.
Hey Derek,
Users that negatively reacted to posts were always suppose to be hidden - them being revealed for a while was a bug that we recently patched. Only mods/admins should be able to see that information now. This allows users to anonymously flag posts/comments that they think are irrelevant or bad and prevents the original poster from retaliating against users that downvote them.
