Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
VERDICT: Jury awards Gibson’s Bakery $11 million against Oberlin College
Comments
-
It stings when a pathological liar calls me a name.2001400ex said:
You are racist. You just don't know it.SFGbob said:
They didn't really care about the facts at all. There was no discrimination. There were false accusations of discrimination with zero evidence to support those accusation. There are no "two sides" to this story. There is the truth and there are the lies the SJWs and the college told.ZoneUW said:
Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.SFGbob said:
What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
Liberals have been getting away with falsely smearing people for being racist for a long time now. Finally there's been a little pay back. Why I believe you were a lying Kunt calling me a racist just the other day. -
Damn right, maybe when liberal asswholes that you support start feeling it in the wallet they might think twice before smearing people with bogus charges of racism.HHusky said:
“Pay back” explains blob’s and Deej’s interest in the story.SFGbob said:
They didn't really care about the facts at all. There was no discrimination. There were false accusations of discrimination with zero evidence to support those accusation. There are no "two sides" to this story. There is the truth and there are the lies the SJWs and the college told.ZoneUW said:
Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.SFGbob said:
What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
Liberals have been getting away with falsely smearing people for being racist for a long time now. Finally there's been a little pay back. Why I believe you were a lying Kunt calling me a racist just the other day. -
Yes, yes Kunt. The city settling with the family proves that he really was shot in the back while running away. Gosh I wish I could be smartz like you O'Keefed. O'Keefed, remind me again how you got your name. Surely you must have gotten it doing something really, really smart.HHusky said:
Weird how that wrongful death suit didn’t result in the defense verdict I kept hearing about.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes, the guy who swallowed like a bitch the lie that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who claimed "credible" eyewitnesses said that Brown was shot point blank in the head while on his knees with his arms in the air is too smart for me.HHusky said:SFGbob said:
Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.HHusky said:
You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours.
Remind me again how you got your name O'keefed? -
If you were unbiased, you would realize the college didn’t send the students to attack the bakery. They were just defending the free speech of the students. Do you not support free speech?
-
That was the defense story. It didn’t hold up under close examination. Oberlin deserves the hit it’s taking.ZoneUW said:If you were unbiased, you would realize the college didn’t send the students to attack the bakery. They were just defending the free speech of the students. Do you not support free speech?
-
Free speech doesn't protect you when you engage in slander and libel.ZoneUW said:If you were unbiased, you would realize the college didn’t send the students to attack the bakery. They were just defending the free speech of the students. Do you not support free speech?
And the College did help to "send" the students to "attack" the bakery.
But before those guilty pleas, students at the college immediately declared that Gibson’s was guilty of racial profiling, and large protests were organized outside the bakery. Flyers were passed out claiming Gibson’s was “racist” and had “a long account of racial profiling and discrimination.” The Oberlin College Dean of Students Meredith Raimondo allegedly participated in handing out the flyers in front of the bakery. The Oberlin College Student Senate also passed a resolution claiming Gibson’s “has a long history of racial profiling and discriminatory treatment of students and residents alike.” The college administration allegedly helped spread this student senate resolution.
The college in response to these false allegations being made by the students and the Dean of Students stopped all business with the bakery. -
Was it adjudicated? Then their is no verdict.HHusky said:
Weird how that wrongful death suit didn’t result in the defense verdict I kept hearing about.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes, the guy who swallowed like a bitch the lie that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who claimed "credible" eyewitnesses said that Brown was shot point blank in the head while on his knees with his arms in the air is too smart for me.HHusky said:SFGbob said:
Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.HHusky said:
You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours.
Remind me again how you got your name O'keefed? -
It don’t cost $1.5 million to bring a summary judgment motion.Sledog said:
Was it adjudicated? Then their is no verdict.HHusky said:
Weird how that wrongful death suit didn’t result in the defense verdict I kept hearing about.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes, the guy who swallowed like a bitch the lie that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who claimed "credible" eyewitnesses said that Brown was shot point blank in the head while on his knees with his arms in the air is too smart for me.HHusky said:SFGbob said:
Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.HHusky said:
You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours.
Remind me again how you got your name O'keefed? -
Wow. $1.5 million, They must of had a really strong case. The city's insurance paid the settlement and the city avoided having to pay for a trial. Any verdict over $3M would have had to been covered by the city. It was a no brainer for the city to settle.HHusky said:
It don’t cost $1.5 million to bring a summary judgment motion.Sledog said:
Was it adjudicated? Then their is no verdict.HHusky said:
Weird how that wrongful death suit didn’t result in the defense verdict I kept hearing about.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes, the guy who swallowed like a bitch the lie that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who claimed "credible" eyewitnesses said that Brown was shot point blank in the head while on his knees with his arms in the air is too smart for me.HHusky said:SFGbob said:
Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.HHusky said:
You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours.
Remind me again how you got your name O'keefed?
$1.5 M for the wrongful death of a 19 year old budding rap star is peanuts. The family must of really believed he was going earn a lot of money over the course of his life. What's 45 divided by 1.5 Million again? Now, tell us how the settlement proves he really was shot in the back while running away O'Keefed?
-
Very clearly free speech ain’t free. Fair market value looks to be $11 million.ZoneUW said:If you were unbiased, you would realize the college didn’t send the students to attack the bakery. They were just defending the free speech of the students. Do you not support free speech?
‘Just’ defending. That’s gold. -
Anyone who’s dealt with an insurance company has to be chucking at the idea that they just pay out whenever the insured asks them to. $1.5 million is quite a bit for a difficult case with an unsympathetic decedent.SFGbob said:
Wow. $1.5 million, They must of had a really strong case. The city's insurance paid the settlement and the city avoided having to pay for a trial. Any verdict over $3M would have had to been covered by the city. It was a no brainer for the city to settle.HHusky said:
It don’t cost $1.5 million to bring a summary judgment motion.Sledog said:
Was it adjudicated? Then their is no verdict.HHusky said:
Weird how that wrongful death suit didn’t result in the defense verdict I kept hearing about.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes, the guy who swallowed like a bitch the lie that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who claimed "credible" eyewitnesses said that Brown was shot point blank in the head while on his knees with his arms in the air is too smart for me.HHusky said:SFGbob said:
Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.HHusky said:
You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours.
Remind me again how you got your name O'keefed?
$1.5 M for the wrongful death of a 19 year old budding rap star is peanuts. Now, tell us how the settlement proves he really was shot in the back while running away O'Keefed? -
The city might have felt that paying $1.5 million bought them some good will from the very same lynch mob you happily supported. Fighting the case and winning could have easily led to more riots and violence and destruction of the city from your pals O'Keefed. Now for the question you continue to dodge like a Kunt. How does the settlement prove he really was shot in the back while running away?HHusky said:
Anyone who’s dealt with an insurance company has to be chucking at the idea that they just pay out whenever the insured asks them to. $1.5 million is quite a bit for a difficult case with an unsympathetic decedent.SFGbob said:
Wow. $1.5 million, They must of had a really strong case. The city's insurance paid the settlement and the city avoided having to pay for a trial. Any verdict over $3M would have had to been covered by the city. It was a no brainer for the city to settle.HHusky said:
It don’t cost $1.5 million to bring a summary judgment motion.Sledog said:
Was it adjudicated? Then their is no verdict.HHusky said:
Weird how that wrongful death suit didn’t result in the defense verdict I kept hearing about.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes, the guy who swallowed like a bitch the lie that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who claimed "credible" eyewitnesses said that Brown was shot point blank in the head while on his knees with his arms in the air is too smart for me.HHusky said:SFGbob said:
Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.HHusky said:
You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours.
Remind me again how you got your name O'keefed?
$1.5 M for the wrongful death of a 19 year old budding rap star is peanuts. Now, tell us how the settlement proves he really was shot in the back while running away O'Keefed? -
I thought he was a budding brain surgeon? Kind, wonderful and outgoing when not high or robbing people.SFGbob said:
Wow. $1.5 million, They must of had a really strong case. The city's insurance paid the settlement and the city avoided having to pay for a trial. Any verdict over $3M would have had to been covered by the city. It was a no brainer for the city to settle.HHusky said:
It don’t cost $1.5 million to bring a summary judgment motion.Sledog said:
Was it adjudicated? Then their is no verdict.HHusky said:
Weird how that wrongful death suit didn’t result in the defense verdict I kept hearing about.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes, the guy who swallowed like a bitch the lie that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who claimed "credible" eyewitnesses said that Brown was shot point blank in the head while on his knees with his arms in the air is too smart for me.HHusky said:SFGbob said:
Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.HHusky said:
You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours.
Remind me again how you got your name O'keefed?
$1.5 M for the wrongful death of a 19 year old budding rap star is peanuts. The family must of really believed he was going earn a lot of money over the course of his life. What's 45 divided by 1.5 Million again? Now, tell us how the settlement proves he really was shot in the back while running away O'Keefed? -
Shocking O'Keefed ran away. But don't worry folks the next time the subject comes up that O'Keefed claimed Brown was shot in the back while running away, he'll bring up his $1.5 M settlement "defense" again. That's what smart guys like O'Keefed do.SFGbob said:
The city might have felt that paying $1.5 million bought them some good will from the very same lynch mob you happily supported. Fighting the case and winning could have easily led to more riots and violence and destruction of the city from your pals O'Keefed. Now for the question you continue to dodge like a Kunt. How does the settlement prove he really was shot in the back while running away?HHusky said:
Anyone who’s dealt with an insurance company has to be chucking at the idea that they just pay out whenever the insured asks them to. $1.5 million is quite a bit for a difficult case with an unsympathetic decedent.SFGbob said:
Wow. $1.5 million, They must of had a really strong case. The city's insurance paid the settlement and the city avoided having to pay for a trial. Any verdict over $3M would have had to been covered by the city. It was a no brainer for the city to settle.HHusky said:
It don’t cost $1.5 million to bring a summary judgment motion.Sledog said:
Was it adjudicated? Then their is no verdict.HHusky said:
Weird how that wrongful death suit didn’t result in the defense verdict I kept hearing about.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes, the guy who swallowed like a bitch the lie that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who claimed "credible" eyewitnesses said that Brown was shot point blank in the head while on his knees with his arms in the air is too smart for me.HHusky said:SFGbob said:
Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.HHusky said:
You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours.
Remind me again how you got your name O'keefed?
$1.5 M for the wrongful death of a 19 year old budding rap star is peanuts. Now, tell us how the settlement proves he really was shot in the back while running away O'Keefed?
