Tucker Carlson wants a new party in the US

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

ZoneUW said:

RaceBannon said:

Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

HTH

Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

Open question

You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

I'd vote neither myself

But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


For now

*100 million in total

A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810

How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?

But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.

Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.

You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.

Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.

Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.

And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...

Are you that Ignorant?

https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html


Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.

Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773

So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.


Bernie is. Warren is.

Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.

That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people.

I didn’t ask that. You asked how many did Democracy kill. I said I don’t know, you tell me, in your own words. Which you didn’t do. Typical hondo. My original prediction that hondo would be ok with socialist deaths is right, as always. Didn’t say a word about it and immediately when to the but but but argument.

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

RaceBannon said:

ZoneUW said:

RaceBannon said:

Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still

Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP

HTH

Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?

Open question

You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or Chinese

I'd vote neither myself

But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country


For now

*100 million in total

A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810

How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?

But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.

Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.

You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.

Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.

Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.

And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...

Are you that Ignorant?

https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html


Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.

Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773

So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.


Bernie is. Warren is.

Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.

That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people.

I didn’t ask that. You asked how many did Democracy kill. I said I don’t know, you tell me, in your own words. Which you didn’t do. Typical hondo. My original prediction that hondo would be ok with socialist deaths is right, as always. Didn’t say a word about it and immediately when to the but but but argument.

Mike, this is your point. Explain how Bennie and Warren's policies are akin to those that killed 100 million people.