Tucker Carlson wants a new party in the US
Comments
-
I don't recall any executions or gulags did I miss something?2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810 -
Vanilla works for Derek.creepycoug said:
I had the same question. WTF Derek?RaceBannon said:How come wtfs don't show who gave them?
-
Are you that Ignorant?MikeDamone said:
Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.2001400ex said:
Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.MikeDamone said:
You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.2001400ex said:
Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.MikeDamone said:
But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html
Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead. -
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War#TablesSledog said:
I don't recall any executions or gulags did I miss something?2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810 -
2001400ex said:
Are you that Ignorant?MikeDamone said:
Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.2001400ex said:
Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.MikeDamone said:
You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.2001400ex said:
Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.MikeDamone said:
But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html
Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.
Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773
So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.
Bernie is. Warren is. -
Bill Ayers, barry's mentor and ghostwriter, was a commie and thought that 25 million dead Americans would do the trick. But the far right is the one's we need to focus on. After all, they control the public education system.
-
Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
Are you that Ignorant?MikeDamone said:
Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.2001400ex said:
Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.MikeDamone said:
You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.2001400ex said:
Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.MikeDamone said:
But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html
Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.
Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773
So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.
Bernie is. Warren is.
That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people. -
You are a special kind of stupid.WestlinnDuck said:Bill Ayers, barry's mentor and ghostwriter, was a commie and thought that 25 million dead Americans would do the trick. But the far right is the one's we need to focus on. After all, they control the public education system.
-
Translation: I'm a lightweight and a Kunt who isn't capable of refuting anything you said so I'll just call it "stupid" and maybe one of the Hondo Bros will be here shortly to tongue my ass.2001400ex said:
You are a special kind of stupid.WestlinnDuck said:Bill Ayers, barry's mentor and ghostwriter, was a commie and thought that 25 million dead Americans would do the trick. But the far right is the one's we need to focus on. After all, they control the public education system.
-
I didn’t ask that. You asked how many did Democracy kill. I said I don’t know, you tell me, in your own words. Which you didn’t do. Typical hondo. My original prediction that hondo would be ok with socialist deaths is right, as always. Didn’t say a word about it and immediately when to the but but but argument.2001400ex said:
Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
Are you that Ignorant?MikeDamone said:
Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.2001400ex said:
Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.MikeDamone said:
You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.2001400ex said:
Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.MikeDamone said:
But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html
Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.
Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773
So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.
Bernie is. Warren is.
That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people. -
Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810 -
Swaye said:
Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
HondoFS gonna HondoFS
-
Mike, this is your point. Explain how Bennie and Warren's policies are akin to those that killed 100 million people.MikeDamone said:
I didn’t ask that. You asked how many did Democracy kill. I said I don’t know, you tell me, in your own words. Which you didn’t do. Typical hondo. My original prediction that hondo would be ok with socialist deaths is right, as always. Didn’t say a word about it and immediately when to the but but but argument.2001400ex said:
Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
Are you that Ignorant?MikeDamone said:
Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.2001400ex said:
Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.MikeDamone said:
You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.2001400ex said:
Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.MikeDamone said:
But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html
Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.
Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773
So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.
Bernie is. Warren is.
That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people. -
Not at all. Just making a point. One that's lost on you in the trailer park.Swaye said:
Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810 -
Even dumbasses in the trailer park know that comparing the War in Iraq to 100 million killed in various purges and mass executions due to Communism is a reach only a dumb donkey would make.2001400ex said:
Not at all. Just making a point. One that's lost on you in the trailer park.Swaye said:
Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810 -
@moralequivalencedawg, true?Swaye said:
Even dumbasses in the trailer park know that comparing the War in Iraq to 100 million killed in various purges and mass executions due to Communism is a reach only a dumb donkey would make.2001400ex said:
Not at all. Just making a point. One that's lost on you in the trailer park.Swaye said:
Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810 -
At least Hondo is consistent in that he won’t answer the original question but spays the thread with logical fallacies. You can’t answer the original question or defend your original point. Got it.2001400ex said:
Mike, this is your point. Explain how Bennie and Warren's policies are akin to those that killed 100 million people.MikeDamone said:
I didn’t ask that. You asked how many did Democracy kill. I said I don’t know, you tell me, in your own words. Which you didn’t do. Typical hondo. My original prediction that hondo would be ok with socialist deaths is right, as always. Didn’t say a word about it and immediately when to the but but but argument.2001400ex said:
Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
Are you that Ignorant?MikeDamone said:
Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.2001400ex said:
Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.MikeDamone said:
You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.2001400ex said:
Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.MikeDamone said:
But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html
Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.
Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773
So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.
Bernie is. Warren is.
That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people. -
A "special kind of stupid" you said? How about a special kind of ignorance, like yours.2001400ex said:
Mike, this is your point. Explain how Bennie and Warren's policies are akin to those that killed 100 million people.MikeDamone said:
I didn’t ask that. You asked how many did Democracy kill. I said I don’t know, you tell me, in your own words. Which you didn’t do. Typical hondo. My original prediction that hondo would be ok with socialist deaths is right, as always. Didn’t say a word about it and immediately when to the but but but argument.2001400ex said:
Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
Are you that Ignorant?MikeDamone said:
Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.2001400ex said:
Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.MikeDamone said:
You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.2001400ex said:
Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.MikeDamone said:
But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html
Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.
Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773
So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.
Bernie is. Warren is.
That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people.
You don't know shit about human history. Stick to burger flipping. -
Probably 5-6 times that number but the point stands. What's 120,000,000? They believe the Earth needs another thinning out anyway.RaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now -
Hondo, I seldom jump on you and have even come to your defense a time or two. I have the shrapnel in my ass to prove it.Swaye said:
Even dumbasses in the trailer park know that comparing the War in Iraq to 100 million killed in various purges and mass executions due to Communism is a reach only a dumb donkey would make.2001400ex said:
Not at all. Just making a point. One that's lost on you in the trailer park.Swaye said:
Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
But you're off the rails on this one and holding on to it is like a Strongballz rant. Just let it go. -
Ironic.MikeDamone said:
Huh? Yes there is major support. Ask AOG. He has all the polls he needs.ZoneUW said:
If there is major support for a political ideology that led to the deaths of hundreds of millions, are all the supporters evil and stupid or is there something wrong with the status quo?MikeDamone said:
Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.2001400ex said:
Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.MikeDamone said:
You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.2001400ex said:
Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.MikeDamone said:
But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
And didn’t you bitch out of here a year ago because HH was ruining your life. pussy -
My original point is that democracy killed people too. Both are wrong. But the ultimate point is that Bernie's and Warren's policies are not akin to the policies that led to 100 million dead people. A point you clearly stated and won't defend.MikeDamone said:
At least Hondo is consistent in that he won’t answer the original question but spays the thread with logical fallacies. You can’t answer the original question or defend your original point. Got it.2001400ex said:
Mike, this is your point. Explain how Bennie and Warren's policies are akin to those that killed 100 million people.MikeDamone said:
I didn’t ask that. You asked how many did Democracy kill. I said I don’t know, you tell me, in your own words. Which you didn’t do. Typical hondo. My original prediction that hondo would be ok with socialist deaths is right, as always. Didn’t say a word about it and immediately when to the but but but argument.2001400ex said:
Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
Are you that Ignorant?MikeDamone said:
Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.2001400ex said:
Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.MikeDamone said:
You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.2001400ex said:
Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.MikeDamone said:
But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html
Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.
Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773
So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.
Bernie is. Warren is.
That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people. -
creepycoug said:
Hondo, I seldom jump on you and have even come to your defense a time or two. I have the shrapnel in my ass to prove it.Swaye said:
Even dumbasses in the trailer park know that comparing the War in Iraq to 100 million killed in various purges and mass executions due to Communism is a reach only a dumb donkey would make.2001400ex said:
Not at all. Just making a point. One that's lost on you in the trailer park.Swaye said:
Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
But you're off the rails on this one and holding on to it is like a Strongballz rant. Just let it go.
I'm not saying the two are similar. I just point out that America and democracy are not free from their share of deaths in the name of democracy.
The larger point however, is that the liberals in the race do not have policies that are akin to what brought about 100 million people dead. And no one has brought forth any meaningful discussion to demonstrate that contention. And Mike is walking back like a pussy right now. -
Laura Bush killed people. Hitler killed people. Both are wrong.2001400ex said:
My original point is that democracy killed people too. Both are wrong. But the ultimate point is that Bernie's and Warren's policies are not akin to the policies that led to 100 million dead people. A point you clearly stated and won't defend.MikeDamone said:
At least Hondo is consistent in that he won’t answer the original question but spays the thread with logical fallacies. You can’t answer the original question or defend your original point. Got it.2001400ex said:
Mike, this is your point. Explain how Bennie and Warren's policies are akin to those that killed 100 million people.MikeDamone said:
I didn’t ask that. You asked how many did Democracy kill. I said I don’t know, you tell me, in your own words. Which you didn’t do. Typical hondo. My original prediction that hondo would be ok with socialist deaths is right, as always. Didn’t say a word about it and immediately when to the but but but argument.2001400ex said:
Mike just moved the goal posts. I didn't say democracy killed 100 million people. You asked what wars were started in the name of democracy. And I answered it.MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
Are you that Ignorant?MikeDamone said:
Tell me about them. I genuinely want to know about wars started “in the name of democracy”. In your own words.2001400ex said:
Mike is ignorant to wars in the name of democracy in the last 20 years.MikeDamone said:
You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.2001400ex said:
Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.MikeDamone said:
But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
And as predicted, Hondo is ok with 100 million dead in socialist regimes. No comment about that. But but but...
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/06/politics/in-bushs-words-iraqi-democracy-will-succeed.html
Now answer what political candidate is advocating the same policies that led to 100 million dead.
Sounds like Bush was right. https://www.wsj.com/articles/iraqs-surprise-the-persistence-of-democracy-1510933773
So you can’t tell me in your own words how democracy killed 100 million people. Got it.
Bernie is. Warren is.
That being said, explain in your words Bernie's and Warren's policies that are akin to the policies that killed 100 million people.
Kunt logic, is there anything it can't do? -
Neither did Stalin. Or, fuck, even Tito.2001400ex said:creepycoug said:
Hondo, I seldom jump on you and have even come to your defense a time or two. I have the shrapnel in my ass to prove it.Swaye said:
Even dumbasses in the trailer park know that comparing the War in Iraq to 100 million killed in various purges and mass executions due to Communism is a reach only a dumb donkey would make.2001400ex said:
Not at all. Just making a point. One that's lost on you in the trailer park.Swaye said:
Are you actually insinuating Communism is better than Democracy? Jesus dude. You've lost it.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810
But you're off the rails on this one and holding on to it is like a Strongballz rant. Just let it go.
I'm not saying the two are similar. I just point out that America and democracy are not free from their share of deaths in the name of democracy.
The larger point however, is that the liberals in the race do not have policies that are akin to what brought about 100 million people dead. And no one has brought forth any meaningful discussion to demonstrate that contention. And Mike is walking back like a pussy right now.
https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP9.HTM
https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP13.HTM
Putting together all the subtotals (lines 333 to 350), in this century the United States probably murdered about 583,000 people (line 350), conceivable even as many as 1,641,000 all told. Virtually all of these were foreigners killed during foreign wars. Domestically, throughout this century the American Federal or state governments were responsible for the murder of about 1 out of every 1,111,000 Americans per year.
-
I'd vote for a candidate with the balls to admit we're overcrowded and puts sterilization on the platform.DuckHHunterisafag said:
Probably 5-6 times that number but the point stands. What's 120,000,000? They believe the Earth needs another thinning out anyway.RaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
I draw the line at genocide though. I just won't. -
What is the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar, a parliamentary democracy Alex.MikeDamone said:
You tell me all the “democracies” in the last 20 years that put their citizens in labor camps and prisons because of political descent, created famines, sent people to reeducation centers and killed “undesirables” (i.e gays, retards, and cripples). I haven’t actually done the research. You seem to know.2001400ex said:
Damoan goes in his ignorant rant again.MikeDamone said:
But but but.... says the purveyor of logical fallacies. Hondo mounts his defense of socialism and communism.2001400ex said:
How many people did democracy kill in the 2000s?MikeDamone said:
*100 million in totalRaceBannon said:
You can ask 20 million dead Soviets or ChineseZoneUW said:RaceBannon said:Plain old socialists killed more people than national socialists but still
Only one party really wants socialism and it isn't the GOP
HTH
Is hoarding grain and assassinating political enemies as bad as gassing women and children?
Open question
I'd vote neither myself
But if you want to support the party that killed 20 million you can. Its a free country
For now
A link for Hondo... But I’m sure he will attack the source, not read it (80 hour work week) and defend the ideology.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/100-years-of-communismand-100-million-dead-1510011810 -
Being so brain poisoned by right-wing media you think democratic socialism is comparable to Soviet or Chinese communism.
-
HardlyClothed said:
Being so brain poisoned by right-wing media you think democratic socialism is comparable to Soviet or Chinese communism.
-
Look who's back for more!!! Who would have thunk that you would have any ass left to hand over. But apparently you do. T's and P's.HardlyClothed said:Being so brain poisoned by right-wing media you think democratic socialism is comparable to Soviet or Chinese communism.