Creepy Lyin’ Joe at it again. He can’t help himself.
Comments
-
Straw man is a common noun. Don't capitalize common nouns unless they are first in a sentence. That mistake tips me off that you are still at grammar school level like that dumbfuck president. He doesn't know what a common noun is either.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
-
Since you are referring to a specific person, the word ‘President’ becomes a proper noun and should be capitalized.ApostleofGrief said:
Straw man is a common noun. Don't capitalize common nouns unless they are first in a sentence. That mistake tips me off that you are still at grammar school level like that dumbfuck president. He doesn't know what a common noun is either.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
-
-
At least Senator Biden doesn't have a lot of rape accusations to deny.
-
-
-
But flea is a tuff ignorant lib.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
-
Capitalization would only be mandatory if "president" was followed by his name. Sometimes people do capitalize without the full title. So it varies. Your insistance that it should be capitalized or it is erroneous shows your ignorance.USMChawk said:
Since you are referring to a specific person, the word ‘President’ becomes a proper noun and should be capitalized.ApostleofGrief said:
Straw man is a common noun. Don't capitalize common nouns unless they are first in a sentence. That mistake tips me off that you are still at grammar school level like that dumbfuck president. He doesn't know what a common noun is either.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
-
Flea is a fucking moron.salemcoog said:
But flea is a tuff ignorant lib.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics,
-
ApostleofGrief said:
Capitalization would only be mandatory if "president" was followed by his name. Sometimes people do capitalize without the full title. So it varies. Your insistance that it should be capitalized or it is erroneous shows your ignorance.USMChawk said:
Since you are referring to a specific person, the word ‘President’ becomes a proper noun and should be capitalized.ApostleofGrief said:
Straw man is a common noun. Don't capitalize common nouns unless they are first in a sentence. That mistake tips me off that you are still at grammar school level like that dumbfuck president. He doesn't know what a common noun is either.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
Your sentence is referring to a specific person, by his title, which makes it a proper noun; capitalization is correct, grammatically. The fact you can’t concede a simple grammatical error shows your insecurity. Had you not called out Bob for the same thing, this whole tangent could have been avoided. But hey, keep doubting down and show the rest of the board your ignorance.ApostleofGrief said:
Capitalization would only be mandatory if "president" was followed by his name. Sometimes people do capitalize without the full title. So it varies. Your insistance that it should be capitalized or it is erroneous shows your ignorance.USMChawk said:
Since you are referring to a specific person, the word ‘President’ becomes a proper noun and should be capitalized.ApostleofGrief said:
Straw man is a common noun. Don't capitalize common nouns unless they are first in a sentence. That mistake tips me off that you are still at grammar school level like that dumbfuck president. He doesn't know what a common noun is either.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
-
This is false.USMChawk said:ApostleofGrief said:
Capitalization would only be mandatory if "president" was followed by his name. Sometimes people do capitalize without the full title. So it varies. Your insistance that it should be capitalized or it is erroneous shows your ignorance.USMChawk said:
Since you are referring to a specific person, the word ‘President’ becomes a proper noun and should be capitalized.ApostleofGrief said:
Straw man is a common noun. Don't capitalize common nouns unless they are first in a sentence. That mistake tips me off that you are still at grammar school level like that dumbfuck president. He doesn't know what a common noun is either.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
Your sentence is referring to a specific person, by his title, which makes it a proper noun; capitalization is correct, grammatically. The fact you can’t concede a simple grammatical error shows your insecurity. Had you not called out Bob for the same thing, this whole tangent could have been avoided. But hey, keep doubting down and show the rest of the board your ignorance.ApostleofGrief said:
Capitalization would only be mandatory if "president" was followed by his name. Sometimes people do capitalize without the full title. So it varies. Your insistance that it should be capitalized or it is erroneous shows your ignorance.USMChawk said:
Since you are referring to a specific person, the word ‘President’ becomes a proper noun and should be capitalized.ApostleofGrief said:
Straw man is a common noun. Don't capitalize common nouns unless they are first in a sentence. That mistake tips me off that you are still at grammar school level like that dumbfuck president. He doesn't know what a common noun is either.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
-
Do a search on "president" in this article. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/30/us/politics/trump-mexico-tariffs.html
-
It shows capitalization when used as his full title -- otherwise it is lowercase.
-
ApostleofGrief said:
This is false.USMChawk said:ApostleofGrief said:
Capitalization would only be mandatory if "president" was followed by his name. Sometimes people do capitalize without the full title. So it varies. Your insistance that it should be capitalized or it is erroneous shows your ignorance.USMChawk said:
Since you are referring to a specific person, the word ‘President’ becomes a proper noun and should be capitalized.ApostleofGrief said:
Straw man is a common noun. Don't capitalize common nouns unless they are first in a sentence. That mistake tips me off that you are still at grammar school level like that dumbfuck president. He doesn't know what a common noun is either.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
Your sentence is referring to a specific person, by his title, which makes it a proper noun; capitalization is correct, grammatically. The fact you can’t concede a simple grammatical error shows your insecurity. Had you not called out Bob for the same thing, this whole tangent could have been avoided. But hey, keep doubting down and show the rest of the board your ignorance.ApostleofGrief said:
Capitalization would only be mandatory if "president" was followed by his name. Sometimes people do capitalize without the full title. So it varies. Your insistance that it should be capitalized or it is erroneous shows your ignorance.USMChawk said:
Since you are referring to a specific person, the word ‘President’ becomes a proper noun and should be capitalized.ApostleofGrief said:
Straw man is a common noun. Don't capitalize common nouns unless they are first in a sentence. That mistake tips me off that you are still at grammar school level like that dumbfuck president. He doesn't know what a common noun is either.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
-
Quit humping my leg you fucking faggot.salemcoog said:
But flea is a tuff ignorant lib.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
-
Gaybob is a humongous pussy.SFGbob said:
Flea is a fucking moron.salemcoog said:
But flea is a tuff ignorant lib.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics,
How many whiny fucking threads have you started today, bitch? -
Back to the lightweight Kunt act eh Flea? Trying to have a substantive conversation didn't work out to well for you did it dumbfuck.dflea said:
Gaybob is a humongous pussy.SFGbob said:
Flea is a fucking moron.salemcoog said:
But flea is a tuff ignorant lib.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics,
How many whiny fucking threads have you started today, bitch?
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics,
Fucking moron.
-
Doesn't mean shit that this creep is leading now, even if he wasn't doing this shit he'd get destroyed in the debates, the second he opens his mouth someone will leapfrog him
-
Substantive discussion - in the Tug.SFGbob said:
Back to the lightweight Kunt act eh Flea? Trying to have a substantive conversation didn't work out to well for you did it dumbfuck.dflea said:
Gaybob is a humongous pussy.SFGbob said:
Flea is a fucking moron.salemcoog said:
But flea is a tuff ignorant lib.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics,
How many whiny fucking threads have you started today, bitch?
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics,
Fucking moron.
lol
You're such a fucking retard. Go kill yourself. -
Before the topic changes back for good I want to remind all of you basement dwelling motherfuckers that I won the capitalization argument with links to prove it. So fuck off.
-
True, but you also have to consider who your opponent was. Congrats but was it really that hard?ApostleofGrief said:Before the topic changes back for good I want to remind all of you basement dwelling motherfuckers that I won the capitalization argument with links to prove it. So fuck off.
-
There's no chance of a substantive discussion with a dumbfuck like you Flea.dflea said:
Substantive discussion - in the Tug.SFGbob said:
Back to the lightweight Kunt act eh Flea? Trying to have a substantive conversation didn't work out to well for you did it dumbfuck.dflea said:
Gaybob is a humongous pussy.SFGbob said:
Flea is a fucking moron.salemcoog said:
But flea is a tuff ignorant lib.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics,
How many whiny fucking threads have you started today, bitch?
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics,
Fucking moron.
lol
You're such a fucking retard. Go kill yourself.
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics
I'm just glad you finally let go of the side of the kiddie pool and confirmed what I always suspected about you.
-
Well, true, but we to fight idiocy because it is killing this country. A sure fire acid test of an idiot is that he capitalizes nouns just because he thinks the word important. So you see the dumbfuck president capitalizes "Country" regularly. What this means is that he never paid attention in school and doesn't bother with details. He also thinks idiotic things like China or Mexico pays for his tariffs. But Americans do. The list of idiocy becomes endless.CirrhosisDawg said:
True, but you also have to consider who your opponent was. Congrats but was it really that hard?ApostleofGrief said:Before the topic changes back for good I want to remind all of you basement dwelling motherfuckers that I won the capitalization argument with links to prove it. So fuck off.
-
Dance, little monkey!SFGbob said:
There's no chance of a substantive discussion with a dumbfuck like you Flea.dflea said:
Substantive discussion - in the Tug.SFGbob said:
Back to the lightweight Kunt act eh Flea? Trying to have a substantive conversation didn't work out to well for you did it dumbfuck.dflea said:
Gaybob is a humongous pussy.SFGbob said:
Flea is a fucking moron.salemcoog said:
But flea is a tuff ignorant lib.DJDuck said:Says the guy that pops off on most subjects whether he has any knowledge at all. You misrepresented someone’s viewpoint in order to advance your own objective. That is a Strawman. This is used quite often by ignorant libs that aren’t knowledgeable of the facts and/or have too untenable of a position to mount a cohesive argument
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics,
How many whiny fucking threads have you started today, bitch?
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics,
Fucking moron.
lol
You're such a fucking retard. Go kill yourself.
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics
I'm just glad you finally let go of the side of the kiddie pool and confirmed what I always suspected about you. -
And yes Flea, there are substantive discussions here. Just none that include you because as we all now know, you're a dipshit.
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics
Weird how I already you were a dumbfuck, but I do appreciate the confirmation. And of course, you're too big a Kunt to even admit that you had your head up your ass. -
GayBob has substantive discussions here. Says everything you need to know.SFGbob said:And yes Flea, there are substantive discussions here. Just none that include you because as we all now know, you're a dipshit.
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics
Weird how I already you were a dumbfuck, but I do appreciate the confirmation. And of course, you're too big a Kunt to even admit that you had your head up your ass. -
Again, you don't ever have a substantive discussion here El Monte. Like Flea you're a dumbfuck and you know it.CirrhosisDawg said:
GayBob has substantive discussions here. Says everything you need to know.SFGbob said:And yes Flea, there are substantive discussions here. Just none that include you because as we all now know, you're a dipshit.
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics
Weird how I already you were a dumbfuck, but I do appreciate the confirmation. And of course, you're too big a Kunt to even admit that you had your head up your ass.
-
lolSFGbob said:And yes Flea, there are substantive discussions here. Just none that include you because as we all now know, you're a dipshit.
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics
Weird how I already you were a dumbfuck, I do appreciate the confirmation. And of course, you're too big a Kunt to even admit that you had your head up your ass.
You're a pussy and a dumbfuck. Go die.
-
Just reinforces the reality every time you respond Flea. You're nothing more than a very mouthy lightweight dumbfuck. You want to play so badly but you know you're a dipshit and all that will happen is that you'll expose yourself as such.dflea said:
lolSFGbob said:And yes Flea, there are substantive discussions here. Just none that include you because as we all now know, you're a dipshit.
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics
Weird how I already you were a dumbfuck, I do appreciate the confirmation. And of course, you're too big a Kunt to even admit that you had your head up your ass.
You're a pussy and a dumbfuck. Go die.
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics
Don't feel bad Flea, you have plenty of company. El Monte is no different than you and it's not a coincidence that you two have found each other and now spend so much time tonguing each others ass.
Shit seeks it's own level Flea.
-
Dance, you little monkey!SFGbob said:
Just reinforces the reality every time you respond Flea. You're nothing more than a very mouthy lightweight dumbfuck. You want to play so badly but you know you're a dipshit and all that will happen is that you'll expose yourself as such.dflea said:
lolSFGbob said:And yes Flea, there are substantive discussions here. Just none that include you because as we all now know, you're a dipshit.
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics
Weird how I already you were a dumbfuck, I do appreciate the confirmation. And of course, you're too big a Kunt to even admit that you had your head up your ass.
You're a pussy and a dumbfuck. Go die.
Sanger was no big fan of eugenics
Don't feel bad Flea, you have plenty of company. El Monte is no different than you and it's not a coincidence that you two have found each other and now spend so much time tonguing each others ass.
Shit seeks it's own level Flea.
lol