Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

More evidence on which campaign really did collude with the Russians

SFGbob
SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
  • Christopher Steele told a State Department official a former Russian spy chief and a top Kremlin adviser were involved in an operation to collect compromising information on Donald Trump.
  • The State Department official’s notes also indicate Steele claimed the Russians, Vyacheslav Trubnikov and Vladislav Surkov, were “sources” for the dossier.
  • There is no evidence the compromising material mentioned in the dossier actually exists, raising questions about whether Steele was given disinformation.
  • Trubnikov, the former head of the SVR, also has links to Stefan Halper, an FBI informant who had contact with the Trump campaign.
Dossier author Christopher Steele identified a former Russian spy chief and a top adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin as being involved in handling potentially compromising information about President Donald Trump, State Department notes show.

In her notes, State Department official Kathleen Kavalec also referred to the two Russians — former Russian foreign intelligence chief Vyacheslav Trubnikov and Putin aide Vladislav Surkov — as “sources.”

https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/16/steele-dossier-sources-state-department/
«13

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,027 Founders Club
    The NY Times admitted that the dossier could be Russian agitprop
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    I don't think anyone thought there was high reliability in the Steele report and Hillary never released her "research" to the public.

    While you are distracted with this rabbit hole. You forget that the only crime would be getting the FISA wiretap illegally.

    You must really watch magic tricks with awe. Don't understand how distraction works.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204

    The NY Times admitted that the dossier could be Russian agitprop

    Weird how Mueller had zero interest in this collusion with the Russians. That was what he was tasked to investigate. How the Russians interfered with our election but when it came to this interference he couldn't be bothered to look into it.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    Weird how McCain did this since according to Hondo nobody thought there was high reliability in the Steele report.

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/03/19/grant_woods_john_mccain_gave_trump_dossier_to_fbi_thats_what_a_statesman_does.html


    Btw, Hondo what happened to your lie about Republicans paying for the Steele report?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204

    2001400ex said:

    I don't think anyone thought there was high reliability in the Steele report and Hillary never released her "research" to the public.

    While you are distracted with this rabbit hole. You forget that the only crime would be getting the FISA wiretap illegally.

    You must really watch magic tricks with awe. Don't understand how distraction works.

    Other than that how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?

    Gee it was only an illegal spying operation on a political opponent. That's it. No biggie

    An illegal spying operation on a political opponent predicated on a piece of opposition research gathered by a foreign national from Russian sources that had ties to the Kremlin and paid for entirely by the Hillary Campaign and the DNC.

    All of which Hondo stated until just recently was nothing more than a right-wing, tin foil hat, conspiracy theory that never happened.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    I don't think anyone thought there was high reliability in the Steele report and Hillary never released her "research" to the public.

    While you are distracted with this rabbit hole. You forget that the only crime would be getting the FISA wiretap illegally.

    You must really watch magic tricks with awe. Don't understand how distraction works.

    Other than that how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?

    Gee it was only an illegal spying operation on a political opponent. That's it. No biggie

    How was the spying operation illegal exactly?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,027 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I don't think anyone thought there was high reliability in the Steele report and Hillary never released her "research" to the public.

    While you are distracted with this rabbit hole. You forget that the only crime would be getting the FISA wiretap illegally.

    You must really watch magic tricks with awe. Don't understand how distraction works.

    Other than that how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?

    Gee it was only an illegal spying operation on a political opponent. That's it. No biggie

    How was the spying operation illegal exactly?
    You already answered that moron
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I don't think anyone thought there was high reliability in the Steele report and Hillary never released her "research" to the public.

    While you are distracted with this rabbit hole. You forget that the only crime would be getting the FISA wiretap illegally.

    You must really watch magic tricks with awe. Don't understand how distraction works.

    Other than that how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?

    Gee it was only an illegal spying operation on a political opponent. That's it. No biggie

    How was the spying operation illegal exactly?
    You already answered that moron
    Oh really?