Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

COLLEGEDOOG!! TRUE?!?

1…567911

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0
    RaceBannon said:

    Its true. Stop lying

    No. It's not.

    If your example is climategate, we're all laughing at you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,456 Founders Club
    You're lying
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,011
    More fun with CollegeDoog...

    Here is the blog post he has been posting most of his pretty pictures from:
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/petergleick/2012/02/05/global-warming-has-stopped-how-to-fool-people-using-cherry-picked-climate-data/2/


    Here is some more interesting on the religious global warming zealot that is Peter Gleick:
    http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/20/peter-gleick-admits-to-deception-in-obtaining-heartland-climate-files/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0
    (i.e....he's as big a fraud as Hansen, and got caught so he had to resign all sorts of positions...and the stuff he leaked has serious factual errors so its likely he forged that as well). He also likes to cherry pick data after telling other people not too...sounds kinda familiar...

    The unmolested data is available...I've shown it from NASA...they and the IPCC are both global warming advocates and both agree there has been no warming in the last 17 years. But that doesn't stop CollegeDoog from trudging away in idiocy...

    And you are years behind on the Hansen models being discredited with his scenerios...they are already on a next generation of models that have also been discredited (one link among many...)

    Keep swinging CollegeDoog...I haven't seen this many softballs in years. I will say you've inspired me...I'll post a couple more stories on the idiots of the global warming religion this evening to make you feel better (you aren't alone...).

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited January 2014
    Sorry HH, the "everybody is a fraud" theory doesn't hold up just like your "no warming in 17 years" theory.

    I used that hard data from that blog post, nothing Peter Gleick wrote.

    I'm starting to think you are incapable of reading a graph.

    Talk about softballs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,456 Founders Club
    He didn't say everybody. He gave you examples of the frauds. You're a liar which discredits you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0
    RaceBannon said:

    He didn't say everybody. He gave you examples of the frauds. You're a liar which discredits you.

    The data that Hansen and Gleick promote is accepted by everybody (97%) in the scientific community.

    To discredit that data is to discredit everybody.

    Hth.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    It is so easy and cool to be a liberal fag when you are living off of Mom and Dads/Government money.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,456 Founders Club
    CollegeDoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    He didn't say everybody. He gave you examples of the frauds. You're a liar which discredits you.

    The data that Hansen and Gleick promote is accepted by everybody (97%) in the scientific community.

    To discredit that data is to discredit everybody.

    Hth.
    No it isn't. And your side has been caught. Liar
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0
    CuntWaffle said:

    It is so easy and cool to be a liberal fag when you are living off of Mom and Dads/Government money.

    A significant percentage of Republicans accept global warming.

    The Weekly Standard has encouraged conservatives to accept the science so we can actually get shit done.

    Great ignorant liberal hate as always though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,011
    edited January 2014
    CollegeDoog finally got one thing corrrect..."promote". These are not unbiased scientists analyzing data using the scientific method...these are advocates promoting a view using any and all means, including selective data, hiding analysis, and even more unethical means (Gleick). And idiots like CollegeDoog lap it up without even blinking (or thinking).

    I'll try and keep it simple...you are taking blog posts from a guy who's admitted having huge ethical lapses to promote his position to say you have (cherry-picked) data that proves reality wrong...even the head of the IPCC Climate disagrees:

    THE UN's climate change chief, Rajendra Pachauri, has acknowledged a 17-year pause in global temperature rises

    and even your boy Hansen says you are wrong (from his paper published in 2012)
    "The five-year mean global temperature has been flat for the last decade, which we interpret as a combination of natural variability and a slow down in the growth rate of net climate forcing." (Global Temperature Update Through 2012.)

    You ignored the discussion on the climate models...maybe you are finally accepting those are wrong too? (True saying...all models are wrong, some models are useful. Unfortunately these haven't reached that level yet).

    And yes, now 97% of the scientist have read, reviewed, and analyzed all of the climate data and agree. You are even dumber than you type.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter