COLLEGEDOOG!! TRUE?!?
Comments
-
Collegedoog...keep it up. Its funny. Or something...where to start...
Considering the ignorance of you and others that have attacked him (Hansen for one) I'll laugh at you calling his science bad. Like I said before, at least he puts out his theory/calcs in detail so it can be analyzed, which is better that most all the frauds on the Global Warming side.
Yeah, you like to say Scenerio B fits best...brilliant....here is one plot among the many showing how stupid this statement is.
No, temps have been flat. Its hasn't been debunked by you...even the IPCC guy admits it (linked previously). Why again are you using "adjusted" temp data now? If you had half a clue you'd realize this latest plot doesn't even match the previous 3 or 4 you posted with global temps for the last 15 years...you REALLY are bad at this.
Here is yet another plot showing what an idiot you keep proving yourself to be...straight from NASA. Anyone with a Stat 101 understanding would realize the slope for the last 17 years is statistically 0...pick your starting point for whatever nominal slope you want to make yourself feel better with.
During this same time period CO2 levels have gone up 40 ppm...Crickets...
I'm glad you have the 1st grade understanding that if temps were increasing until 1997 and then stayed flat the average for the 1990s would be less than the average for the 2000s. Your mommy give you a lollipop for coming up with this?
Thank you for again ignoring any link in CO2 levels for the last 17 years to temp...4 times now in this thread? The el nino dog that ate the global warming for 17 years and counting...
Keep dooging it...and keep digging yourself in your own global warming hole...
-
Are you kidding me. You're a lost cause.HoustonHusky said:Collegedoog...keep it up. Its funny. Or something...where to start...
Considering the ignorance of you and others that have attacked him (Hansen for one) I'll laugh at you calling his science bad. Like I said before, at least he puts out his theory/calcs in detail so it can be analyze, which is better that most all the frauds on the Global Warming side.
Yeah, you like to say Scenerio B fits best...brilliant....here is one plot among the many showing how stupid this statement is.
No, temps have been flat. Its hasn't been debunked by you...even the IPCC guy admits it (linked previously). Why again are you using "adjusted" temp data now? If you had half a clue you'd realize this latest plot doesn't even match the previous 3 or 4 you posted with global temps for the last 15 years...you REALLY are bad at this.
Here is yet another plot showing what an idiot you keep proving yourself to be...straight from NASA. Anyone with a Stat 101 understanding would realize the slope for the last 17 years is statistically 0...pick your starting point for whatever nominal slope you want to make yourself feel better with.
During this same time period CO2 levels have gone up 40 ppm...Crickets...
I'm glad you have the 1st grade understanding that if temps were increasing until 1997 and then stayed flat the average for the 1990s would be less than the average for the 2000s. Your mommy give you a lollipop for coming up with this?
Thank you for again ignoring any link in CO2 levels for the last 17 years to temp...4 times now in this thread? The el nino dog that ate the global warming for 17 years and counting...
Keep dooging it...and keep digging yourself in your own global warming hole...
In red is Hansen's Scenario B.
Another:
Keep posting bullshit though like the temps have a statistical slope of 0 which is not even close to true.
I don't think you understand averages or trendlines, at all. -
Lindzen is like the Koch brothers to the Tourettes left.....you just scream the name to "kick ass" in your argument. Lindzen is a scientist who was good enough to be on the council until he went against the faith. Collegedoog has done....well.....nothing.
-
Houston Husky is a scientist. Collegedoog has done......well......norhing
-
When Houston Husky posts accurate data he can be taken seriously.RaceBannon said:Houston Husky is a scientist. Collegedoog has done......well......norhing
-
I doubt you will ever be taken seriously. Your side got caught lying and fudging data. And yet you claim anyone who doesn't believe has bad data. Heal yourself
-
Wow.RaceBannon said:I doubt you will ever be taken seriously. Your side got caught lying and fudging data. And yet you claim anyone who doesn't believe has bad data. Heal yourself
That's all you need to know folks. -
Its true. Stop lying
-
Middlebury, my company is doing a fair of amount of export biz with the Chineeze (btw, total pain in the ass. they are a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act nightmare. I feel like we need legal counsel to follow the guys around over there. At every fucking turn there's an issue, and the business guys wind up spending as much time on the phone with me (for pretend) as they do with their business counterparts.RaceBannon said:Learn how to think its catching on
China is fucking up their air, we cleaned ours.
But they are FAR more serious
What a moron
anyway, feedback I get from them is that it's a very dirty place. air quality is an oxymoron there.
I would never trust the Chineeze. -
I don't trust them but they shouldn't be a deterrent or an excuse for inaction.creepycoug said:
Middlebury, my company is doing a fair of amount of export biz with the Chineeze (btw, total pain in the ass. they are a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act nightmare. I feel like we need legal counsel to follow the guys around over there. At every fucking turn there's an issue, and the business guys wind up spending as much time on the phone with me (for pretend) as they do with their business counterparts.RaceBannon said:Learn how to think its catching on
China is fucking up their air, we cleaned ours.
But they are FAR more serious
What a moron
anyway, feedback I get from them is that it's a very dirty place. air quality is an oxymoron there.
I would never trust the Chineeze.
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
