First it was no collusion

2001400ex · April 2019

Then Collusion wasn't a crime. Now you can accept information from Russians. Guliani is pure comedy gold.

http://twitter.com/CNN/status/1119954855538429952

MikeDamone · April 2019

But there was no collusion.

ApostleofGrief · April 2019

Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

MikeDamone · April 2019

ApostleofGrief said:
Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

Or they could run a decent candidate in the election that’s 18 months away....

Or keep grasping at straws. Imagine being afraid of a guy with orange hair.

ApostleofGrief · April 2019

just imagine Hillary did all this and you will see the light. I would think the same thing regardless

HHusky · April 2019

I remember Al Gore being (justifiably) roasted for saying something like there was “no binding precedent” criminalizing some shady thing he or Bill Clinton had done.

Pitchfork51 · April 2019

ApostleofGrief said:
just imagine Hillary did all this and you will see the light. I would think the same thing regardless

I would have not voted for her.

Like I didn't. And like many other people didn't.

Remember when you looked between your legs and realized you had no balls so decided you were with her?

SFGbob · April 2019

HHusky said:
I remember Al Gore being (justifiably) roasted for saying something like there was “no binding precedent” criminalizing some shady thing he or Bill Clinton had done.

It was no controlling legal authority but then when did a low IQ fucker like you ever get anything right

HHusky · April 2019

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:
I remember Al Gore being (justifiably) roasted for saying something like there was “no binding precedent” criminalizing some shady thing he or Bill Clinton had done.
It was no controlling legal authority but then when did a low IQ fucker like you ever get anything right

Really changes the meaning.

Should the guy who just told us how Seattle had no blacks, but was teeming with Indians 40 years ago really be talking smack about anyone?

Pitchfork51 · April 2019

I'm hearing that Trump is a Russian agent

I mean he colluded with them, Mueller will tell us

I mean muellers thing was always just a step toward Congress taking him down

I mean once muelller testifies and it's really bad then Congress will probably take him down

....

MikeDamone · April 2019

HondoBros came in their pants when they saw this.

https://youtu.be/JFKRpMErPFM

Imagine being gleeful when you thought the president was a traitor.

SFGbob · April 2019

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:
I remember Al Gore being (justifiably) roasted for saying something like there was “no binding precedent” criminalizing some shady thing he or Bill Clinton had done.
It was no controlling legal authority but then when did a low IQ fucker like you ever get anything right
Really changes the meaning.

Should the guy who just told us how Seattle had no blacks, but was teeming with Indians 40 years ago really be talking smack about anyone?

Not what I said but you and Hondo have been tonguing each other’s ass as of late so maybe you’re aspiring for pathological liar status as well

RaceBannon · April 2019

Just an orange haired kid from Queens

2001400ex · April 2019

ApostleofGrief said:
Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.

CirrhosisDawg · April 2019

MikeDamone said:

ApostleofGrief said:
Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

ApostleofGrief said:
Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.
Or they could run a decent candidate in the election that’s 18 months away....

Or keep grasping at straws. Imagine being afraid of a guy with orange hair.

Good point. Trump will have the opportunity to defend himself in from of the voters in 18 months. Until then, it will be in front of congress and media.

Pitchfork51 · April 2019

Hondo has really brought this place to the brink of ultimate shittiness

2001400ex · April 2019

Pitchfork51 said:
Hondo has really brought this place to the brink of ultimate shittiness

Impressive given I wasn't really on here today.

ApostleofGrief · April 2019

2001400ex said:

ApostleofGrief said:
Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.
Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.

The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.

MikeDamone · April 2019

ApostleofGrief said:

2001400ex said:

ApostleofGrief said:
Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.
Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.

Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.

ApostleofGrief · April 2019

MikeDamone said:

ApostleofGrief said:

2001400ex said:

ApostleofGrief said:
Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.
Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.

Sure, sure, but not before we

IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP

Sledog · April 2019

ApostleofGrief said:

MikeDamone said:

ApostleofGrief said:

2001400ex said:

ApostleofGrief said:
Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.
Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.
Sure, sure, but not before we

IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP

Hondo alt?

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

First it was no collusion

Comments