Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

First it was no collusion

2001400ex
2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
edited April 2019 in Tug Tavern
Then Collusion wasn't a crime. Now you can accept information from Russians. Guliani is pure comedy gold.

«1

Comments

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    But there was no collusion.
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    just imagine Hillary did all this and you will see the light. I would think the same thing regardless
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    edited April 2019
    I remember Al Gore being (justifiably) roasted for saying something like there was “no binding precedent” criminalizing some shady thing he or Bill Clinton had done.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662

    just imagine Hillary did all this and you will see the light. I would think the same thing regardless

    I would have not voted for her.

    Like I didn't. And like many other people didn't.

    Remember when you looked between your legs and realized you had no balls so decided you were with her?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    I remember Al Gore being (justifiably) roasted for saying something like there was “no binding precedent” criminalizing some shady thing he or Bill Clinton had done.

    It was no controlling legal authority but then when did a low IQ fucker like you ever get anything right
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I remember Al Gore being (justifiably) roasted for saying something like there was “no binding precedent” criminalizing some shady thing he or Bill Clinton had done.

    It was no controlling legal authority but then when did a low IQ fucker like you ever get anything right
    Really changes the meaning.

    Should the guy who just told us how Seattle had no blacks, but was teeming with Indians 40 years ago really be talking smack about anyone?
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    I'm hearing that Trump is a Russian agent


    I mean he colluded with them, Mueller will tell us

    I mean muellers thing was always just a step toward Congress taking him down

    I mean once muelller testifies and it's really bad then Congress will probably take him down


    ....
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I remember Al Gore being (justifiably) roasted for saying something like there was “no binding precedent” criminalizing some shady thing he or Bill Clinton had done.

    It was no controlling legal authority but then when did a low IQ fucker like you ever get anything right
    Really changes the meaning.

    Should the guy who just told us how Seattle had no blacks, but was teeming with Indians 40 years ago really be talking smack about anyone?
    Not what I said but you and Hondo have been tonguing each other’s ass as of late so maybe you’re aspiring for pathological liar status as well
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,799 Founders Club
    Just an orange haired kid from Queens
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Or they could run a decent candidate in the election that’s 18 months away....

    Or keep grasping at straws. Imagine being afraid of a guy with orange hair.
    Good point. Trump will have the opportunity to defend himself in from of the voters in 18 months. Until then, it will be in front of congress and media.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Hondo has really brought this place to the brink of ultimate shittiness
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Hondo has really brought this place to the brink of ultimate shittiness

    Impressive given I wasn't really on here today.
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    2001400ex said:

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
    The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    2001400ex said:

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
    The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
    Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904

    2001400ex said:

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
    The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
    Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.
    Sure, sure, but not before we

    IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,715 Standard Supporter

    2001400ex said:

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
    The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
    Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.
    Sure, sure, but not before we

    IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP
    Hondo alt?
  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800

    2001400ex said:

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
    The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
    Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.
    Sure, sure, but not before we

    IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP

  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,146 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
    The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
    Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.
    Sure, sure, but not before we

    IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP
    Stay away from sharp objects psycho
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
    The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
    Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.
    Sure, sure, but not before we

    IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP
    Hondo alt?
    He has many
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
    The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
    Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.
    Sure, sure, but not before we

    IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,034
    edited April 2019
    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
    The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
    Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.
    Sure, sure, but not before we

    IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP

    People forget that even if the House votes to impeach, the Senate still needs to hold a trial of impeachment - which requires a 2/3 vote to impeach.

    People forget that.

    So, yes, crying like a little bitch is the new normal.

  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999

    just imagine Hillary did all this and you will see the light. I would think the same thing regardless

    Imagine? She did and then some, or do like to ignore the fact even the NYTs now accepts that the fake Steele Dossier was a bunch of Russian misinformation that Hillary's campaign paid actual cash to Russians for.

    AoG going HondoFS...

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
    The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
    Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.
    Sure, sure, but not before we

    IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP

    People forget that even if the House votes to impeach, the Senate still needs to hold a trial of impeachment - which requires a 2/3 vote to impeach.

    People forget that.

    So, yes, crying like a little bitch is the new normal.

    And even if Trump fully admitted to colluding with Russians after lying under oath about it. Still no Republican in the Senate would vote to impeach him.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,034
    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
    The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
    Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.
    Sure, sure, but not before we

    IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP

    People forget that even if the House votes to impeach, the Senate still needs to hold a trial of impeachment - which requires a 2/3 vote to impeach.

    People forget that.

    So, yes, crying like a little bitch is the new normal.

    And even if Trump fully admitted to colluding with Russians after lying under oath about it. Still no Republican in the Senate would vote to impeach him.
    Why do you hate the rule of law?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.

    It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.

    Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.
    The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.
    Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.
    Sure, sure, but not before we

    IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP

    People forget that even if the House votes to impeach, the Senate still needs to hold a trial of impeachment - which requires a 2/3 vote to impeach.

    People forget that.

    So, yes, crying like a little bitch is the new normal.

    And even if Trump fully admitted to colluding with Russians after lying under oath about it. Still no Republican in the Senate would vote to impeach him.
    Why do you hate the rule of law?
    I don't hate the rule of law at all. Just stating a fact.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    just imagine Hillary did all this and you will see the light. I would think the same thing regardless

    Imagine? She did and then some, or do like to ignore the fact even the NYTs now accepts that the fake Steele Dossier was a bunch of Russian misinformation that Hillary's campaign paid actual cash to Russians for.

    AoG going HondoFS...


    Read the Mueller report. It addresses the Steele dossier and Carter page that you have a boner over.