First it was no collusion
Comments
-
Not what I said but you and Hondo have been tonguing each other’s ass as of late so maybe you’re aspiring for pathological liar status as wellHHusky said:
Really changes the meaning.SFGbob said:
It was no controlling legal authority but then when did a low IQ fucker like you ever get anything rightHHusky said:I remember Al Gore being (justifiably) roasted for saying something like there was “no binding precedent” criminalizing some shady thing he or Bill Clinton had done.
Should the guy who just told us how Seattle had no blacks, but was teeming with Indians 40 years ago really be talking smack about anyone? -
Just an orange haired kid from Queens
-
Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.ApostleofGrief said:Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.
It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear. -
Good point. Trump will have the opportunity to defend himself in from of the voters in 18 months. Until then, it will be in front of congress and media.MikeDamone said:ApostleofGrief said:Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.
It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.
Or they could run a decent candidate in the election that’s 18 months away....ApostleofGrief said:Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.
It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.
Or keep grasping at straws. Imagine being afraid of a guy with orange hair. -
Hondo has really brought this place to the brink of ultimate shittiness
-
Impressive given I wasn't really on here today.Pitchfork51 said:Hondo has really brought this place to the brink of ultimate shittiness
-
The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.2001400ex said:
Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.ApostleofGrief said:Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.
It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear. -
Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.ApostleofGrief said:
The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.2001400ex said:
Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.ApostleofGrief said:Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.
It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear. -
Sure, sure, but not before weMikeDamone said:
Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.ApostleofGrief said:
The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.2001400ex said:
Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.ApostleofGrief said:Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.
It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.
IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP -
Hondo alt?ApostleofGrief said:
Sure, sure, but not before weMikeDamone said:
Oh fuck off. Waste of resources. Focus on a decent candidate and move the fuck on.ApostleofGrief said:
The witness and the evidence need to be presented, as in any trial. Who is believed is up to the jury (Senate). I believe the prosecution's case, even with half of it blacked out by that fatass Bar and his motherfucking redactor pen.2001400ex said:
Be careful. If Bob reads that again and picks up on that quote. He's going to spam the board for months calling you a pathological liar.ApostleofGrief said:Trump based his entire defense on conflating collusion with criminal conspiracy. The GOP managed to fool the public that if there was on criminal conspiracy, there was no collusion.
It doesn't matter what the fuck you call, or if it was illegal or not. Impeachment is for cases in which the accused carries out high crimes against the republic. The fact that Trump knew about, and benefited directly from the Russian hacks, and kept the FBI and the public wholly in the dark by keeping this to himself and his associates, and then engaged in a protracted campaign of obstruction means he needs to be impeached. All you have to do understand this is stop applying labels like collusion vs conspiracy, and then simply imagine if Hillary did this. Then it becomes clear.
IMPEACH THE MOTHERFUCKING GODDAMN CURRENT FUCKING BASTARD TRUMP
