Hugh Breedlove Millen
Comments
-
If Haener is our starting QB next year, burn the fucking program to the ground. I can’t deal with 3 more years of a small armed OKG faggot. We’re never going to win a championship with a QB like Haener. We can’t beat the Clemsons and Bamas of the world without an elite QB. Eason better win the job.
-
Calm down turboEsophagealFeces said:If Haener is our starting QB next year, burn the fucking program to the ground. I can’t deal with 3 more years of a small armed OKG faggot. We’re never going to win a championship with a QB like Haener. We can’t beat the Clemsons and Bamas of the world without an elite QB. Eason better win the job.
-
Befuddled is a GOOD word.jecornel said:Is BEFUDDLED by how many reps Haener is getting. BEFUDDLED!
this has legs....stay tuned. -
That was building for 6 days of practice. It was bound to escape eventually.MikeDamone said:
Calm down turboEsophagealFeces said:If Haener is our starting QB next year, burn the fucking program to the ground. I can’t deal with 3 more years of a small armed OKG faggot. We’re never going to win a championship with a QB like Haener. We can’t beat the Clemsons and Bamas of the world without an elite QB. Eason better win the job.
-
Any updates on Eason's mom from Puppy?
-
Seriously I can't figure this one out. Raw talent wise it's not that close. I think pete is trying to protect his "everything has to be fair" mantra and maybe not give the pathetic pac 12 coaches any early tips.
-
I think we should all make a pact to stop saying this like it's based in reality.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Seriously I can't figure this one out. Raw talent wise it's not that close. I think pete is trying to protect his "everything has to be fair" mantra and maybe not give the pathetic pac 12 coaches any early tips.
A.) UW doesn't open with a PAC-12 team. So the cat's going to be out of the bag. It's not like USC is going to start revamping their defensive strategy now to get ahead of some game in October or something.
B.) Even if the "element of surprise" made one damned bit of sense, element of surprise < reps for presumptive starter.
I think it's time to allow for the possibility that Haener might just legitimately win the position. All through the Browning era, the big complaint was that he never had to compete for his job, now there's a real competition, and everyone's pissed that Pete doesn't just anoint the 5-star transfer in the spring? Either competition is good or it isn't. It's not like the staff would start Haener just because they like short guys who throw pick-sixes--Petersen's "type" is the guy who is accurate, avoids turnovers, and moves the chains, which doesn't rule out a 6'5" cannon-armed guy in the least.
They're getting their chances, and we're not privy to what's happening in the closed Saturday full-contact practices. If Haener wins, he wins. I'll definitely adjust my expectations for the season were this to happen--it would definitely suck--but the guy who performs should get the nod.
-
Melon head just pissed Pete didnt over his kid. He's a duck now so Pay no mind. Haener would be the starter over his kid at Oregon too. Bitter old dawg
-
Uh Feces, Haener has the strongest arm on roster next to Eason there Genius . Again, typical HH ignoramuses spouting nonsense out their cunts without knowing any about the qb roomEsophagealFeces said:If Haener is our starting QB next year, burn the fucking program to the ground. I can’t deal with 3 more years of a small armed OKG faggot. We’re never going to win a championship with a QB like Haener. We can’t beat the Clemsons and Bamas of the world without an elite QB. Eason better win the job.
-
Pete wants to win Bill. He goes with the best qb thru spring ball to achieve that goal Big bird Eason's best days are behind him...unless he gets serious about weight training and football. I told you dipshits Haener was going to win job...at the VERY least make it a tight battle all way thru fall camp. It's not like you havent been warned ahead of time...a full year ahead of timeFire_Marshall_Bill said:Seriously I can't figure this one out. Raw talent wise it's not that close. I think pete is trying to protect his "everything has to be fair" mantra and maybe not give the pathetic pac 12 coaches any early tips.
