What if I told you that
Comments
-
Mental health will drive you mad.
-
@oregonblitzkriegHillsboroDuck said:Meek said:
you have serious issues man...like I'm not trying to insult you so please consider this friendly feedback... but the way you post on these boards is really troubling.PurpleJ said:
Fuck off.Meek said:
speaking of losersPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.
But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues. -
didn't say the world dude. said ESPN...if you take the time to watch College Football Live every day like I do (old, rich, white and don't have to work much) then you'll actually see that the talking heads do actually take shots at UW constantly. It is on the air literally every time UW is mentioned. I didn't say it's a conspiracy, but what I said is that the committee doesn't objectively assess the teams (it's virtually impossible to do what they suggest they do), but it's undeniable that the narrative about UW is constantly negative on ESPN. I don't see how you could disagree with that (unless you're generalizing and hypothesizing without watching CFL each day like I do).HillsboroDuck said:
The world is not out to get UW.Meek said:
This is a real concern that Race has identified. It shouldn't be an issue, but the reality is that ESPN hates UW so much (I still don't understand why, but they do...it's fucking weird and inappropriate) such that those douches on College Football Live simply diminish everything about UW every time they have a chance. This is where the playoff committee is totally gullible in that none of them watch every game and thus they take their cues from ESPN...with ESPN bitch slapping UW it will naturally elevate any Pac12 team that is not UW - call it Oregon or Stanford or USC.RaceBannon said:UW won the Pac 12 next year and Stanford got the CFP bid?
Let's say UW beats Stanford giving Stanford their only loss while UW loses a conference game but wins the tie breaker. Both are 11-1, UW 12-1 after beating Utah in the CCG
But!
THE TOUGHEST NONCONFERENCE SCHEDULE IN THE COUNTRY
Stanford: vs. Northwestern (Aug. 31), at UCF (Sept. 14), vs. Notre Dame (Nov. 30)
In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.
Stanford sweeps these games they get voted in ahead of Pussy U and our? pussy schedule
The disrespect is unreal!
We were treated as well or better than we deserved in both 2016 (last playoff team in) and 2017 (last NY6 team in).
There's no anti UW conspiracy, and the playoff committee is not looking to screw us. In Race's scenario Stanford gets in ahead of us because Stanford would deserve to be ahead of us. It's not going to happen though.
Take this shit to Doogman.
Ask Race. He's also old, rich and white and watches it every day too. If ESPN wasn't the only national tv show about college football it wouldn't be such a big deal, but the Pac12 Networks doesn't get any messaging to the rest of the country (for the obvious reason they aren't even available to this country). Anyway, I don't dwell on it, but it's a pretty clear theme when you watch ESPN. -
ESPN is petty and stupid but Meek is right, its the only game in town and between Larry FS Scott and our prickly coach, UW is way down the totem (hi @Swaye ) pole thereMeek said:
didn't say the world dude. said ESPN...if you take the time to watch College Football Live every day like I do (old, rich, white and don't have to work much) then you'll actually see that the talking heads do actually take shots at UW constantly. It is on the air literally every time UW is mentioned. I didn't say it's a conspiracy, but what I said is that the committee doesn't objectively assess the teams (it's virtually impossible to do what they suggest they do), but it's undeniable that the narrative about UW is constantly negative on ESPN. I don't see how you could disagree with that (unless you're generalizing and hypothesizing without watching CFL each day like I do).HillsboroDuck said:
The world is not out to get UW.Meek said:
This is a real concern that Race has identified. It shouldn't be an issue, but the reality is that ESPN hates UW so much (I still don't understand why, but they do...it's fucking weird and inappropriate) such that those douches on College Football Live simply diminish everything about UW every time they have a chance. This is where the playoff committee is totally gullible in that none of them watch every game and thus they take their cues from ESPN...with ESPN bitch slapping UW it will naturally elevate any Pac12 team that is not UW - call it Oregon or Stanford or USC.RaceBannon said:UW won the Pac 12 next year and Stanford got the CFP bid?
Let's say UW beats Stanford giving Stanford their only loss while UW loses a conference game but wins the tie breaker. Both are 11-1, UW 12-1 after beating Utah in the CCG
But!
THE TOUGHEST NONCONFERENCE SCHEDULE IN THE COUNTRY
Stanford: vs. Northwestern (Aug. 31), at UCF (Sept. 14), vs. Notre Dame (Nov. 30)
In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.
Stanford sweeps these games they get voted in ahead of Pussy U and our? pussy schedule
The disrespect is unreal!
We were treated as well or better than we deserved in both 2016 (last playoff team in) and 2017 (last NY6 team in).
There's no anti UW conspiracy, and the playoff committee is not looking to screw us. In Race's scenario Stanford gets in ahead of us because Stanford would deserve to be ahead of us. It's not going to happen though.
Take this shit to Doogman.
Ask Race. He's also old, rich and white and watches it every day too. If ESPN wasn't the only national tv show about college football it wouldn't be such a big deal, but the Pac12 Networks doesn't get any messaging to the rest of the country (for the obvious reason they aren't even available to this country). Anyway, I don't dwell on it, but it's a pretty clear theme when you watch ESPN.
But in my original post Stanford would get the bid based on criteria having little to do with ESPN -
Whaa? I can totally see Stanford beating those three teams. Hardly a murderer's row.PurpleJ said:Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
-
None of them are patsies and Stanford is no longer a dominant team. They lose to either ND or UCF.creepycoug said:
Whaa? I can totally see Stanford beating those three teams. Hardly a murderer's row.PurpleJ said:Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
-
Or they don't. Either way, ....PurpleJ said:
None of them are patsies and Stanford is no longer a dominant team. They lose to either ND or UCF.creepycoug said:
Whaa? I can totally see Stanford beating those three teams. Hardly a murderer's row.PurpleJ said:Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
-
In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.creepycoug said:
Or they don't. Either way, ....PurpleJ said:
None of them are patsies and Stanford is no longer a dominant team. They lose to either ND or UCF.creepycoug said:
Whaa? I can totally see Stanford beating those three teams. Hardly a murderer's row.PurpleJ said:Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
-
David Shaw's crew > Derek Johnson's crew.PurpleJ said:
In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.creepycoug said:
Or they don't. Either way, ....PurpleJ said:
None of them are patsies and Stanford is no longer a dominant team. They lose to either ND or UCF.creepycoug said:
Whaa? I can totally see Stanford beating those three teams. Hardly a murderer's row.PurpleJ said:Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
-
The other side of this coin is that the entire league will be judged on how Stanford does non conference since nobody else plays anyone and by nobody I do mean Oregon playing Auburn
That's about it. -
But what happens when we? go 1-11?RaceBannon said:UW won the Pac 12 next year and Stanford got the CFP bid?
Let's say UW beats Stanford giving Stanford their only loss while UW loses a conference game but wins the tie breaker. Both are 11-1, UW 12-1 after beating Utah in the CCG
But!
THE TOUGHEST NONCONFERENCE SCHEDULE IN THE COUNTRY
Stanford: vs. Northwestern (Aug. 31), at UCF (Sept. 14), vs. Notre Dame (Nov. 30)
In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.
Stanford sweeps these games they get voted in ahead of Pussy U and our? pussy schedule -
@YellowSnowHillsboroDuck said:
David Shaw's crew > Derek Johnson's crew.PurpleJ said:
In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.creepycoug said:
Or they don't. Either way, ....PurpleJ said:
None of them are patsies and Stanford is no longer a dominant team. They lose to either ND or UCF.creepycoug said:
Whaa? I can totally see Stanford beating those three teams. Hardly a murderer's row.PurpleJ said:Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
-
Stanford Crew sucks. On the left coast no one cares about academis for Crew.PurpleJ said:
@YellowSnowHillsboroDuck said:
David Shaw's crew > Derek Johnson's crew.PurpleJ said:
In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.creepycoug said:
Or they don't. Either way, ....PurpleJ said:
None of them are patsies and Stanford is no longer a dominant team. They lose to either ND or UCF.creepycoug said:
Whaa? I can totally see Stanford beating those three teams. Hardly a murderer's row.PurpleJ said:Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
-
Stanford does have a very manageable PAC schedule but I still think Shaw finds a way to lose 2 or more league games. They’ve never quite been the same since our 2016 beatdown game.
-
The ‘91 Huskies went undefeated and still got screwed by the mediaPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
-
13-0 or #firepete
-
I only read the headlineRaceBannon said:
That's not the pointPurpleJ said:Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
You need to read for comprehension -
I have a feeling UW fights ESPN on every goddamn thing. It goes back to Gameday against Oregon...maybe even before then.Meek said:
This is a real concern that Race has identified. It shouldn't be an issue, but the reality is that ESPN hates UW so much (I still don't understand why, but they do...it's fucking weird and inappropriate) such that those douches on College Football Live simply diminish everything about UW every time they have a chance. This is where the playoff committee is totally gullible in that none of them watch every game and thus they take their cues from ESPN...with ESPN bitch slapping UW it will naturally elevate any Pac12 team that is not UW - call it Oregon or Stanford or USC.RaceBannon said:UW won the Pac 12 next year and Stanford got the CFP bid?
Let's say UW beats Stanford giving Stanford their only loss while UW loses a conference game but wins the tie breaker. Both are 11-1, UW 12-1 after beating Utah in the CCG
But!
THE TOUGHEST NONCONFERENCE SCHEDULE IN THE COUNTRY
Stanford: vs. Northwestern (Aug. 31), at UCF (Sept. 14), vs. Notre Dame (Nov. 30)
In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.
Stanford sweeps these games they get voted in ahead of Pussy U and our? pussy schedule
The disrespect is unreal!
UW wanted them in Red Square with the cameras facing Mt. Rainier. ESPN wanted a more academic shot and wanted the library. The fight was ridiculous but we know what happened. Schools bend over backwards when ESPN comes to town and they love it. UW welcomes them....sorta...but you aren't getting any special access.
They made the playoff for Chrissakes and the only back story I remember is Kenny Mayne doing something on Chico cause they went to the same high school.
So they come to campus and want back stories/interviews. CP tells them to fuck off so now he's "cantankerous".....there is never anything extra when they come to UW. We give them nothing it seems. -
Classic Seattle Culture move if you axe me.HuskyJW said:
I have a feeling UW fights ESPN on every goddamn thing. It goes back to Gameday against Oregon...maybe even before then.Meek said:
This is a real concern that Race has identified. It shouldn't be an issue, but the reality is that ESPN hates UW so much (I still don't understand why, but they do...it's fucking weird and inappropriate) such that those douches on College Football Live simply diminish everything about UW every time they have a chance. This is where the playoff committee is totally gullible in that none of them watch every game and thus they take their cues from ESPN...with ESPN bitch slapping UW it will naturally elevate any Pac12 team that is not UW - call it Oregon or Stanford or USC.RaceBannon said:UW won the Pac 12 next year and Stanford got the CFP bid?
Let's say UW beats Stanford giving Stanford their only loss while UW loses a conference game but wins the tie breaker. Both are 11-1, UW 12-1 after beating Utah in the CCG
But!
THE TOUGHEST NONCONFERENCE SCHEDULE IN THE COUNTRY
Stanford: vs. Northwestern (Aug. 31), at UCF (Sept. 14), vs. Notre Dame (Nov. 30)
In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.
Stanford sweeps these games they get voted in ahead of Pussy U and our? pussy schedule
The disrespect is unreal!
UW wanted them in Red Square with the cameras facing Mt. Rainier. ESPN wanted a more academic shot and wanted the library. The fight was ridiculous but we know what happened. Schools bend over backwards when ESPN comes to town and they love it. UW welcomes them....sorta...but you aren't getting any special access.
They made the playoff for Chrissakes and the only back story I remember is Kenny Mayne doing something on Chico cause they went to the same high school.
So they come to campus and want back stories/interviews. CP tells them to fuck off so now he's "cantankerous".....there is never anything extra when they come to UW. We give them nothing it seems. -
Usually only the SEC gets the second place in the playoff. The SEC is the greatest conference in the history of sports of course. Alabama could beat the Oakland Raiders and Buffalo Bills by 60 points.
-
Because losing to Cal is a bad loss
-
Always.greenblood said:Because losing to Cal is a bad loss
