Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How could 17 intelligence agencies be wrong?

13»

Comments

  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
    @DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
    "What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."

    It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
    Fine. We disagree on the subject.

    Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.
    Fine. You're not a "liberal ass licking dipshit" and we can disagree but I'd still like to understand, from your perspective, what evidence you've heard or seen that proves the Russians hacked and dispersed the DNC and or Podesta emails.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    IRL, I’m likable.

    I'll need to see the dossier.
    No, you need to see the naked hookers who pissed on Trump. Who the fuck do you think you're kidding here?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,261 Founders Club
    edited March 2019
    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
    @DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
    "What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."

    It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
    Fine. We disagree on the subject.

    Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.
    Fine. You're not a "liberal ass licking dipshit" and we can disagree but I'd still like to understand, from your perspective, what evidence you've heard or seen that proves the Russians hacked and dispersed the DNC and or Podesta emails.
    Ok. So I’m totally confused. Did a Federal Grand Jury indict or not indict the GRU / “fancy bear” Russian operatives in 2018? The likelihood that it wasn’t some greasy slav operative seems remote at best.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
    @DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
    "What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."

    It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
    Fine. We disagree on the subject.

    Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.
    Fine. You're not a "liberal ass licking dipshit" and we can disagree but I'd still like to understand, from your perspective, what evidence you've heard or seen that proves the Russians hacked and dispersed the DNC and or Podesta emails.
    Ok. So I’m totally confused. Did a Federal Grand Jury indict or not indict the GRU / “fancy bear” Russian operatives in 2018? The likelihood that it wasn’t some greasy slav operative seems remote at best.
    Chinned for the Slav slur
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
    @DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
    "What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."

    It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
    Fine. We disagree on the subject.

    Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.
    Fine. You're not a "liberal ass licking dipshit" and we can disagree but I'd still like to understand, from your perspective, what evidence you've heard or seen that proves the Russians hacked and dispersed the DNC and or Podesta emails.
    Ok. So I’m totally confused. Did a Federal Grand Jury indict or not indict the GRU / “fancy bear” Russian operatives in 2018? The likelihood that it wasn’t some greasy slav operative seems remote at best. </blockquote

    "New York State chief judge Sol Wachtler was famously quoted by Tom Wolfe in The Bonfire of the Vanities that "a grand jury would 'indict a ham sandwich,' if that's what you wanted." Will these "operatives" ever see a court room in the USA? We both know the answer to that question but you still haven't addressed the fact that Wikileaks says the DNC and Podesta were not hacked by Russians.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,063
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
    @DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
    "What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."

    It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
    Fine. We disagree on the subject.

    Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.
    Fine. You're not a "liberal ass licking dipshit" and we can disagree but I'd still like to understand, from your perspective, what evidence you've heard or seen that proves the Russians hacked and dispersed the DNC and or Podesta emails.
    Ok. So I’m totally confused. Did a Federal Grand Jury indict or not indict the GRU / “fancy bear” Russian operatives in 2018? The likelihood that it wasn’t some greasy slav operative seems remote at best.
    Chinned for the Slav slur


    The Throbber would like an order of greasy slav and a side order of thighs

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Swaye said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Abandon all hope all ye who enter here

    If there is one part of HH that really exemplifies the ThunderDome moniker, it is here. You need hair on your balls to make it in this place.
    I have to have a little cry each day


    In Obama's america that's okay though
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,748 Standard Supporter
    17 intelligence agencies were wrong because they wanted to be wrong or were told to be wrong.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter