How could 17 intelligence agencies be wrong?

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

YellowSnow said:

RaceBannon said:

Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

So its just another dodge

There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.

I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.

Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.

I’m going to need those links

RaceBannon

YellowSnow said:

DuckHHunterisafag said:

YellowSnow said:

DuckHHunterisafag said:

YellowSnow said:

RaceBannon said:

Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

So its just another dodge

There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.

If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.

@DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.

"What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."

It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?

Fine. We disagree on the subject.

Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.

Its the Tug, Jake

Thick skin and the ability to be called everything under the sun is required here

I'm not really a racist right winger either but we all have our crosses to burn

CuntWaffle

YellowSnow said:

DuckHHunterisafag said:

YellowSnow said:

DuckHHunterisafag said:

YellowSnow said:

RaceBannon said:

Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

So its just another dodge

There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.

If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.

@DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.

"What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."

It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?

Fine. We disagree on the subject.

Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.

You are a good guy Yella. This is the tug, the gloves are off. Don't take anything too personally.

YellowSnow

RaceBannon said:

YellowSnow said:

DuckHHunterisafag said:

YellowSnow said:

DuckHHunterisafag said:

YellowSnow said:

RaceBannon said:

Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

So its just another dodge

There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.

If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.

@DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.

"What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."

It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?

Fine. We disagree on the subject.

Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.

Its the Tug, Jake

Thick skin and the ability to be called everything under the sun is required here

I'm not really a racist right winger either but we all have our crosses to burn

That's fine. I've been posting here in the Tug for almost 3 years and taking my lumps at times. But I ain't gonna take shit from from anyone who I haven't bantered with, at least, a little at HH.

RaceBannon

Abandon all hope all ye who enter here

SFGbob

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

YellowSnow said:

RaceBannon said:

Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

So its just another dodge

There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.

I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.

Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.

I’m going to need those links

Oh Hondo has plenty of links. It's just that he doesn't have one that supports his mouth.

CirrhosisDawg

IRL, I’m likable.

CuntWaffle

CirrhosisDawg said:

IRL, I’m likable.

I would have a beer with you

GrundleStiltzkin

I don’t really care about this. Either way.

GrundleStiltzkin

CirrhosisDawg said:

IRL, I’m likable.

I'll need to see the dossier.