Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
How could 17 intelligence agencies be wrong?
Comments
-
*Comey (fired)RaceBannon said:
Mueller wasn't firedYellowSnow said:
Point being if we're going to use the silly blame the victim analogy, Saddam acted guilty as fuck by not allowing inspections. And the key moment in triggering a special counsel was firing Mueller. That was fucking stoopid move politically. This isn't a fucking 2 bit reality show.RaceBannon said:
Comey deserved to be fired and arrested. The CIC has the ability and right to fire anyone. They serve at the pleasure of the President
Saddam did bring it on by not allowing inspections
Your lame excuse about tax returns and Comey are just that. Admit it, you were part of the mob and you were wrong and it was based on a personal dislike of Trump and his voters that you consistently display here
You're not above the fray or anything else
Your post yesterday was a classic of victim blaming.
How many Presidents have an investigation launched before they are even inaugurated by the party they just beat aided and abetted by the candidate they just beat
That is what you are defending. Own it
And look up probable cause while your at it
The CIC does have the constitutional right to fire any subordinate. That doesn't make it a wise move politically. Johnson was stupid for firing Stanton and set off an impeachment process. Trump errored in firing Comey.
The supporters of Trump here, yourself included, need to quit fucking lumping everyone that disagrees with you into the liberal mob that was 100% confident the hammer was gonna fall any day now. Yes, I've have consistently voiced my loathing of Trump BUT have never called for impeachment or stated a confidence that Mueller was going get him on collusion.
And speaking of mobs, call me when the right gets crooked Hillary or the Obama administration on something finally.
-
The Russians didn't interfere in our election(s)?RaceBannon said:Again
-
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that -
Yes, they did. But the pearl-clutching manner that statement has been used for the last 2 years is disingenuous. The Soviets & Russians have been trying to influence US opinion and elections since the 1920s. The tools and methods might be new and improved, but the efforts are almost a hundred years old.HHusky said:
The Russians didn't interfere in our election(s)?RaceBannon said:Again
-
It was OK when the commies supported the American left and the democratsGrundleStiltzkin said:
Yes, they did. But the pearl-clutching manner that statement has been used for the last 2 years is disingenuous. The Soviets & Russians have been trying to influence US opinion and elections since the 1920s. The tools and methods might be new and improved, but the efforts are almost a hundred years old.HHusky said:
The Russians didn't interfere in our election(s)?RaceBannon said:Again
-
That just means I've never been on the Commies' side. You and blob have, of course.RaceBannon said:
It was OK when the commies supported the American left and the democratsGrundleStiltzkin said:
Yes, they did. But the pearl-clutching manner that statement has been used for the last 2 years is disingenuous. The Soviets & Russians have been trying to influence US opinion and elections since the 1920s. The tools and methods might be new and improved, but the efforts are almost a hundred years old.HHusky said:
The Russians didn't interfere in our election(s)?RaceBannon said:Again
-
Yes yes Bob and I are very familiar with your conservative credentialsHHusky said:
That just means I've never been on the Commies' side. You and blob have, of course.RaceBannon said:
It was OK when the commies supported the American left and the democratsGrundleStiltzkin said:
Yes, they did. But the pearl-clutching manner that statement has been used for the last 2 years is disingenuous. The Soviets & Russians have been trying to influence US opinion and elections since the 1920s. The tools and methods might be new and improved, but the efforts are almost a hundred years old.HHusky said:
The Russians didn't interfere in our election(s)?RaceBannon said:Again
You voted for Hillary so you aren't even accurate -
The key moment was getting Session to recuse himself.YellowSnow said:
Point being if we're going to use the silly blame the victim analogy, Saddam acted guilty as fuck by not allowing inspections. And the key moment in triggering a special counsel was firing Mueller. That was fucking stoopid move politically. This isn't a fucking 2 bit reality show.RaceBannon said: -
I was never on the Commies side and your support for Reagan now over 30 years old. It as if I was still arguing that I'm really a liberal because I voted for Mondale. It's the argument a Kunt would make and that's why you make it.HHusky said:
That just means I've never been on the Commies' side. You and blob have, of course.RaceBannon said:
It was OK when the commies supported the American left and the democratsGrundleStiltzkin said:
Yes, they did. But the pearl-clutching manner that statement has been used for the last 2 years is disingenuous. The Soviets & Russians have been trying to influence US opinion and elections since the 1920s. The tools and methods might be new and improved, but the efforts are almost a hundred years old.HHusky said:
The Russians didn't interfere in our election(s)?RaceBannon said:Again
I was young and stupid when I voted for liberals and thought the world owed me a living. What's your excuse now Kunt? -
When haven't the Russians interfered in our elections? Only losers blame the refs.HHusky said:
The Russians didn't interfere in our election(s)?RaceBannon said:Again
