Yes, they did. But the pearl-clutching manner that statement has been used for the last 2 years is disingenuous. The Soviets & Russians have been trying to influence US opinion and elections since the 1920s. The tools and methods might be new and improved, but the efforts are almost a hundred years old.
It was OK when the commies supported the American left and the democrats
That just means I've never been on the Commies' side. You and blob have, of course.
Yes yes Bob and I are very familiar with your conservative credentials
You voted for Hillary so you aren't even accurate
Hard to know whether you're arguing that the Russians aren't Commies anymore or that they didn't want to kill Hillary's campaign. The former proposition is debatable. The latter is not.
Yes, they did. But the pearl-clutching manner that statement has been used for the last 2 years is disingenuous. The Soviets & Russians have been trying to influence US opinion and elections since the 1920s. The tools and methods might be new and improved, but the efforts are almost a hundred years old.
It was OK when the commies supported the American left and the democrats
That just means I've never been on the Commies' side. You and blob have, of course.
Yes yes Bob and I are very familiar with your conservative credentials
You voted for Hillary so you aren't even accurate
Hard to know whether you're arguing that the Russians aren't Commies anymore or that they didn't want to kill Hillary's campaign. The former proposition is debatable. The latter is not.
Why would they want to kill Hillary's campaign? They didn't. The report says they wanted to sow discord and that they did thanks to dupes like you spreading disinformation
I could go through the list of the ways that Obama and Hillary sucked up to Putin and the ways that Trump has gone against Russia but you don't care. You'll just keep lying. Its what you do
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
Yes, they did. But the pearl-clutching manner that statement has been used for the last 2 years is disingenuous. The Soviets & Russians have been trying to influence US opinion and elections since the 1920s. The tools and methods might be new and improved, but the efforts are almost a hundred years old.
It was OK when the commies supported the American left and the democrats
That just means I've never been on the Commies' side. You and blob have, of course.
Yes yes Bob and I are very familiar with your conservative credentials
You voted for Hillary so you aren't even accurate
Hard to know whether you're arguing that the Russians aren't Commies anymore or that they didn't want to kill Hillary's campaign. The former proposition is debatable. The latter is not.
Hillary was for sale. She made millions on the Uranium One deal. The Russians wanted her.
I started a thread about Trump putting B-62's with nuclear armed cruise missiles in Europe. Not something a Putin guy would do is it?
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
The investigation was on Trump not the Russians hacking the DNC which as Bob points out remains unproven
There was and is no probable cause to go after Trump
Your fabled FBI said in a hearing that without the dossier there is no FISA warrant. We don't spy on political opponents by the sitting POTUS. Ask Nixon. The dossier was fake and Clinton oppo research
There is no deense of this. The fact that it failed doesn't defend it either. Read the texts from the FBI agents. True believers that thought if they didn't find something they could make it up.
The dossier was supposed to knock him out in the first inning
Yes, they did. But the pearl-clutching manner that statement has been used for the last 2 years is disingenuous. The Soviets & Russians have been trying to influence US opinion and elections since the 1920s. The tools and methods might be new and improved, but the efforts are almost a hundred years old.
It was OK when the commies supported the American left and the democrats
That just means I've never been on the Commies' side. You and blob have, of course.
I was never on the Commies side and your support for Reagan now over 30 years old. It as if I was still arguing that I'm really a liberal because I voted for Mondale. It's the argument a Kunt would make and that's why you make it.
I was young and stupid when I voted for liberals and thought the world owed me a living. What's your excuse now Kunt?
You actually voted for liberals because you thought the world owed you a living? It all makes sense now. As if I needed more evidence you are a dumb motherfucker.
Yes, they did. But the pearl-clutching manner that statement has been used for the last 2 years is disingenuous. The Soviets & Russians have been trying to influence US opinion and elections since the 1920s. The tools and methods might be new and improved, but the efforts are almost a hundred years old.
It was OK when the commies supported the American left and the democrats
That just means I've never been on the Commies' side. You and blob have, of course.
I was never on the Commies side and your support for Reagan now over 30 years old. It as if I was still arguing that I'm really a liberal because I voted for Mondale. It's the argument a Kunt would make and that's why you make it.
I was young and stupid when I voted for liberals and thought the world owed me a living. What's your excuse now Kunt?
You actually voted for liberals because you thought the world owed you a living? It all makes sense now. As if I needed more evidence you are a dumb motherfucker.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
The long con knows when to pick up his ball and go home. Live to fight another day.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
El oh El. It's awesome watching you so angry over something you can't even read and understand.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
Isn't Assange hiding in another country? Last I recall he was in Russia or something. Could be wrong.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
El oh El. It's awesome watching you so angry over something you can't even read and understand.
You being a pathological liar doesn't make me angry Hondo, but if sure gives you something to say when you can't back up your lying twat of a mouth.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
El oh El. It's awesome watching you so angry over something you can't even read and understand.
You being a pathological liar doesn't make me angry Hondo, but if sure gives you something to say when you can't back up your lying twat of a mouth.
Pretending Vlad doesn't hate Hills was soooo honest of you.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
El oh El. It's awesome watching you so angry over something you can't even read and understand.
You being a pathological liar doesn't make me angry Hondo, but if sure gives you something to say when you can't back up your lying twat of a mouth.
Pretending Vlad doesn't hate Hills was soooo honest of you.
Where did I ever say that Kunt? Or are you relying again on those famous mind reading skills of yours?
Do you agree with Hondo that's it's a documented fact that the Russians were meeting with Trump's team in order to give them the hacked DNC and Hillary emails?
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
@DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
@DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
"What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."
It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
@DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
"What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."
It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
Fine. We disagree on the subject.
Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.
Comments
I could go through the list of the ways that Obama and Hillary sucked up to Putin and the ways that Trump has gone against Russia but you don't care. You'll just keep lying. Its what you do
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
I started a thread about Trump putting B-62's with nuclear armed cruise missiles in Europe. Not something a Putin guy would do is it?
There was and is no probable cause to go after Trump
Your fabled FBI said in a hearing that without the dossier there is no FISA warrant. We don't spy on political opponents by the sitting POTUS. Ask Nixon. The dossier was fake and Clinton oppo research
There is no deense of this. The fact that it failed doesn't defend it either. Read the texts from the FBI agents. True believers that thought if they didn't find something they could make it up.
The dossier was supposed to knock him out in the first inning
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
Do you agree with Hondo that's it's a documented fact that the Russians were meeting with Trump's team in order to give them the hacked DNC and Hillary emails?
It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.