Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
@DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
"What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."
It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
Fine. We disagree on the subject.
Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.
Its the Tug, Jake
Thick skin and the ability to be called everything under the sun is required here
I'm not really a racist right winger either but we all have our crosses to burn
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
@DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
"What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."
It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
Fine. We disagree on the subject.
Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.
You are a good guy Yella. This is the tug, the gloves are off. Don't take anything too personally.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
@DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
"What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."
It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
Fine. We disagree on the subject.
Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.
Its the Tug, Jake
Thick skin and the ability to be called everything under the sun is required here
I'm not really a racist right winger either but we all have our crosses to burn
That's fine. I've been posting here in the Tug for almost 3 years and taking my lumps at times. But I ain't gonna take shit from from anyone who I haven't bantered with, at least, a little at HH.
Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
I’m going to need those links
Oh Hondo has plenty of links. It's just that he doesn't have one that supports his mouth.
I've sexted a bit with @CirrhosisDawg and can testify under oath that he is a stand up guy even if I would march on Pasadena to put down the Cali Johnny Rebs. His knowledge of Southern California public transit was instrumental in my getting the Rose Bowl in a Green New Deal fashion and at low cost.
I've sexted a bit with @CirrhosisDawg and can testify under oath that he is a stand up guy even if I would march on Pasadena to put down the Cali Johnny Rebs. His knowledge of Southern California public transit was instrumental in my getting the Rose Bowl in a Green New Deal fashion and at low cost.
If you live in mom's basement like Cdawg you know public transport!
Comments
Thick skin and the ability to be called everything under the sun is required here
I'm not really a racist right winger either but we all have our crosses to burn
Just what I'm hearing
Look, I wanted there to be WMDs and probably said but Syria and other things for sometime after
Sooner or later you have to accept there is no there there with Trump
I realize its been a long build up and it seemed so close so many times but there is always 2024
Ts and Ps
HTH