Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How could 17 intelligence agencies be wrong?

2

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited March 2019
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
    Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
    Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
    Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
    Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.


    El oh El. It's awesome watching you so angry over something you can't even read and understand.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
    Isn't Assange hiding in another country? Last I recall he was in Russia or something. Could be wrong.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
    Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
    Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.


    El oh El. It's awesome watching you so angry over something you can't even read and understand.
    You being a pathological liar doesn't make me angry Hondo, but if sure gives you something to say when you can't back up your lying twat of a mouth.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
    Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
    Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.


    El oh El. It's awesome watching you so angry over something you can't even read and understand.
    You being a pathological liar doesn't make me angry Hondo, but if sure gives you something to say when you can't back up your lying twat of a mouth.
    Pretending Vlad doesn't hate Hills was soooo honest of you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
    Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
    Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.


    El oh El. It's awesome watching you so angry over something you can't even read and understand.
    You being a pathological liar doesn't make me angry Hondo, but if sure gives you something to say when you can't back up your lying twat of a mouth.
    Pretending Vlad doesn't hate Hills was soooo honest of you.
    Where did I ever say that Kunt? Or are you relying again on those famous mind reading skills of yours?

    Do you agree with Hondo that's it's a documented fact that the Russians were meeting with Trump's team in order to give them the hacked DNC and Hillary emails?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,261 Founders Club
    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
    @DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
    @DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
    "What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."

    It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,261 Founders Club
    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
    @DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
    "What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."

    It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
    Fine. We disagree on the subject.

    Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,261 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    DuckHHunterisafag said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.
    @DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.
    "What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."

    It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
    Fine. We disagree on the subject.

    Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.
    Its the Tug, Jake

    Thick skin and the ability to be called everything under the sun is required here

    I'm not really a racist right winger either but we all have our crosses to burn
    That's fine. I've been posting here in the Tug for almost 3 years and taking my lumps at times. But I ain't gonna take shit from from anyone who I haven't bantered with, at least, a little at HH.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    MikeDamone said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't

    That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway

    So its just another dodge

    There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that

    What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.

    The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
    I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.
    Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.
    I’m going to need those links
    Oh Hondo has plenty of links. It's just that he doesn't have one that supports his mouth.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    IRL, I’m likable.

    I'll need to see the dossier.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,261 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    IRL, I’m likable.

    I've sexted a bit with @CirrhosisDawg and can testify under oath that he is a stand up guy even if I would march on Pasadena to put down the Cali Johnny Rebs. His knowledge of Southern California public transit was instrumental in my getting the Rose Bowl in a Green New Deal fashion and at low cost.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,072
    RaceBannon said:

    Abandon all hope all ye who enter here

    A lot of fucking words in the Tug about a report that nobody has read
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,870 Founders Club
    Somebody didn't read the letter

    Just what I'm hearing

    Look, I wanted there to be WMDs and probably said but Syria and other things for sometime after

    Sooner or later you have to accept there is no there there with Trump

    I realize its been a long build up and it seemed so close so many times but there is always 2024

    Ts and Ps
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    Somebody didn't read the letter

    Just what I'm hearing

    Look, I wanted there to be WMDs and probably said but Syria and other things for sometime after

    Sooner or later you have to accept there is no there there with Trump

    I realize its been a long build up and it seemed so close so many times but there is always 2024

    Ts and Ps

    Hey Bob. Why don't you call out Race for the strawman? And really it's Fox news regurgitated strawman arguments.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,870 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Somebody didn't read the letter

    Just what I'm hearing

    Look, I wanted there to be WMDs and probably said but Syria and other things for sometime after

    Sooner or later you have to accept there is no there there with Trump

    I realize its been a long build up and it seemed so close so many times but there is always 2024

    Ts and Ps

    Hey Bob. Why don't you call out Race for the strawman? And really it's Fox news regurgitated strawman arguments.
    What's the strawman?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    In real life im actually not Mexican
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Somebody didn't read the letter

    Just what I'm hearing

    Look, I wanted there to be WMDs and probably said but Syria and other things for sometime after

    Sooner or later you have to accept there is no there there with Trump

    I realize its been a long build up and it seemed so close so many times but there is always 2024

    Ts and Ps

    Hey Bob. Why don't you call out Race for the strawman? And really it's Fox news regurgitated strawman arguments.
    What's the strawman?
    Look in bold man. Are you knew hear?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,748 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    IRL, I’m likable.

    I've sexted a bit with @CirrhosisDawg and can testify under oath that he is a stand up guy even if I would march on Pasadena to put down the Cali Johnny Rebs. His knowledge of Southern California public transit was instrumental in my getting the Rose Bowl in a Green New Deal fashion and at low cost.
    If you live in mom's basement like Cdawg you know public transport!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Somebody didn't read the letter

    Just what I'm hearing

    Look, I wanted there to be WMDs and probably said but Syria and other things for sometime after

    Sooner or later you have to accept there is no there there with Trump

    I realize its been a long build up and it seemed so close so many times but there is always 2024

    Ts and Ps

    Hey Bob. Why don't you call out Race for the strawman? And really it's Fox news regurgitated strawman arguments.
    What's the strawman?
    You really would think that a guy who fucks as much strawman ass as Hondo does would know what a strawman argument is but he doesn't.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,870 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Somebody didn't read the letter

    Just what I'm hearing

    Look, I wanted there to be WMDs and probably said but Syria and other things for sometime after

    Sooner or later you have to accept there is no there there with Trump

    I realize its been a long build up and it seemed so close so many times but there is always 2024

    Ts and Ps

    Hey Bob. Why don't you call out Race for the strawman? And really it's Fox news regurgitated strawman arguments.
    What's the strawman?
    Look in bold man. Are you knew hear?
    That's not a strawman

    HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter