How could 17 intelligence agencies be wrong?
Comments
-
Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.2001400ex said:
Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.SFGbob said:
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.YellowSnow said:
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.RaceBannon said:Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
-
El oh El. It's awesome watching you so angry over something you can't even read and understand.SFGbob said:
Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.2001400ex said:
Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.SFGbob said:
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.YellowSnow said:
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.RaceBannon said:Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump. -
If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.YellowSnow said:
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.RaceBannon said:Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt. -
Isn't Assange hiding in another country? Last I recall he was in Russia or something. Could be wrong.DuckHHunterisafag said:
If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.YellowSnow said:
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.RaceBannon said:Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt. -
You being a pathological liar doesn't make me angry Hondo, but if sure gives you something to say when you can't back up your lying twat of a mouth.2001400ex said:
El oh El. It's awesome watching you so angry over something you can't even read and understand.SFGbob said:
Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.2001400ex said:
Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.SFGbob said:
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.YellowSnow said:
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.RaceBannon said:Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump. -
Pretending Vlad doesn't hate Hills was soooo honest of you.SFGbob said:
You being a pathological liar doesn't make me angry Hondo, but if sure gives you something to say when you can't back up your lying twat of a mouth.2001400ex said:
El oh El. It's awesome watching you so angry over something you can't even read and understand.SFGbob said:
Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.2001400ex said:
Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.SFGbob said:
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.YellowSnow said:
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.RaceBannon said:Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump. -
Where did I ever say that Kunt? Or are you relying again on those famous mind reading skills of yours?HHusky said:
Pretending Vlad doesn't hate Hills was soooo honest of you.SFGbob said:
You being a pathological liar doesn't make me angry Hondo, but if sure gives you something to say when you can't back up your lying twat of a mouth.2001400ex said:
El oh El. It's awesome watching you so angry over something you can't even read and understand.SFGbob said:
Fuck you, you pathological lying piece of shit. You have not posted a single link that supports your lie. That's why you can't quote from anything you've linked that supports this statement.2001400ex said:
Read up on Guccifer..I have posted several links with this fact, including from Fox news. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't expect the horse to be smart enough to drink.SFGbob said:
I know its and accepted part of conventional wisdom that the Russians hacked the DNC but other than people repeating it as if it were true I still haven't seen the evidence that establishes that fact.YellowSnow said:
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.RaceBannon said:Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
Do you agree with Hondo that's it's a documented fact that the Russians were meeting with Trump's team in order to give them the hacked DNC and Hillary emails?
-
@DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.DuckHHunterisafag said:
If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.YellowSnow said:
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.RaceBannon said:Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt. -
"What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."YellowSnow said:
@DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.DuckHHunterisafag said:
If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.YellowSnow said:
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.RaceBannon said:Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
-
Fine. We disagree on the subject.DuckHHunterisafag said:
"What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling."YellowSnow said:
@DuckHHunterisafag don't be a fucking cock. You don't know my background and politics.DuckHHunterisafag said:
If what you say is true, then why didn't Mueller question Julian Assange and Wikileaks? You said it isn't open for debate as if you're a really informed and smart guy. I say you're just another liberal ass licking dipshit.YellowSnow said:
What is not open for debate is that there was a concerted effort by Russian operatives to hack the DNC and meddle in the election. I have no idea if they had enough of an impact to affect the final outcome, but there was certainly cause to investigate if there was any foul play. To say otherwise, is partisan schilling.RaceBannon said:Why would anyone keep a rat like Comey around? They wouldn't
That's just fucking stupid. And the investigation was well under way by that time anyway
So its just another dodge
There was no probable cause to launch an investigation of a duly elected President. No dossier no FISA warrant. It was a coup and a fraud and there is not amount of blaming the victim you can do to get around that
The great irony in all of this is that the supposed "Deep State"- i.e., Mueller and his crack team of mostly Democratic lawyers thoroughly investigated and cleared his name. Some fucking Coup attempt.
It is open for debate and you'd lose based on the partisan hack statement you made. The Russians and half the planet are trying to undermine our country every day. Specifically, the DNC hack and subsequent release of the emails were not proven to have been done by the Russians. You wrote that was not open for debate. The organization which released those emails is on the record as saying the information was not obtained by Russia. Moreover, this organization says it has proof. If it's not open for debate, then surely you can show us the proof that the DNC and email release was done by the Russians. There's a reason the Obama administration led "intelligence" agencies haven't investigated this as they should. I wonder why 97% of the media has no interest either?
Now, where do you get off calling me a "liberal ass licking dip shit" ? Again, I am guessing this is our first exchange in the Tug and you don't know fuck all about my political leanings.
