Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Ronald Reagan SLAMMED

13

Comments

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter
    I mean Truman! Come on! FTG!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MariotaTheGawd
    MariotaTheGawd Member Posts: 1,441
    SFGbob said:

    MariotaTheGawd said:

    SFGbob said:

    MariotaTheGawd said:

    SFGbob said:

    Crack didn't really became a huge problem until after Reagan was out of office.

    Lol what
    Sorry if that facts makes your Kunt hurt. Late 80s early 90s is when crack really exploded.
    sure it was
    Brutal rebuttal. Completely destroyed my claim.
    Sorry bud but you haven't done anything to suggest you know what you're talking about. If anything there's a better chance that you're wrong on any given topic
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,219
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Crack didn't really became a huge problem until after Reagan was out of office. The homeless problem in the 1980s compared to now is a complete joke. Far, far worse now. Congress during all of Reagan's Presidency was controlled by Rats. How did he gut the mental health system without the Rats signing off on it.

    Then, as now, the Senate was majority Republican in 1981.
    Correct, I should have been more precise. The House, where all spending starts, was held by the Rats during all of Reagan's 8 years in office. Question still stands and of course you dodged it.
    Rhetorical questions don’t require answers, unless you have Aspergers, of course.
    It wasn't rhetorical. Come on Mr. History, how did Reagan gut the mental health system without the support of the House?
    blob, doesn’t know what a rhetorical question is. Sad!
    Kunt dodges the question and then claims it was rhetorical. When told it wasn't Kunt claims the other person doesn't understand the term.

    That's what Kunts do.

    If you're claiming Reagan gutted mental health, and she did, then the question still stands. How did he do this with a House that was controlled by the Rats?

    That's not a rhetorical question. That's a question you don't want to answer therefore we're treated to this Kunt act.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,219
    Bring them back and have the Federal Government run them it sounds like.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,607
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Crack didn't really became a huge problem until after Reagan was out of office. The homeless problem in the 1980s compared to now is a complete joke. Far, far worse now. Congress during all of Reagan's Presidency was controlled by Rats. How did he gut the mental health system without the Rats signing off on it.

    Then, as now, the Senate was majority Republican in 1981.
    Correct, I should have been more precise. The House, where all spending starts, was held by the Rats during all of Reagan's 8 years in office. Question still stands and of course you dodged it.
    Rhetorical questions don’t require answers, unless you have Aspergers, of course.
    It wasn't rhetorical. Come on Mr. History, how did Reagan gut the mental health system without the support of the House?
    blob, doesn’t know what a rhetorical question is. Sad!
    Kunt dodges the question and then claims it was rhetorical. When told it wasn't Kunt claims the other person doesn't understand the term.

    That's what Kunts do.

    If you're claiming Reagan gutted mental health, and she did, then the question still stands. How did he do this with a House that was controlled by the Rats?

    That's not a rhetorical question. That's a question you don't want to answer therefore we're treated to this Kunt act.
    Determined to prove me right. I approve of that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,219
    MariotaTheGawd said:

    SFGbob said:

    MariotaTheGawd said:

    SFGbob said:

    MariotaTheGawd said:

    SFGbob said:

    Crack didn't really became a huge problem until after Reagan was out of office.

    Lol what
    Sorry if that facts makes your Kunt hurt. Late 80s early 90s is when crack really exploded.
    sure it was
    Brutal rebuttal. Completely destroyed my claim.
    Sorry bud but you haven't done anything to suggest you know what you're talking about. If anything there's a better chance that you're wrong on any given topic
    First of all I lived it. I was in LA during Reagan's last year in office and while crack was already around the peak of the crack epidemic hadn't hit yet.

    Crack’s popularity remains high, despite the dangers, because it’s inexpensive to make, and cheap to buy compared to normal powder cocaine. However, today’s numbers of cocaine and crack cocaine users are fewer than they were at their peak in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

    https://www.ridgefieldrecovery.com/blog/crack-cocaine-history/

    Pretty funny how according to you I'm always wrong but on the few occasions where you've let go of the side of the kiddie pool when engaging with me, you've sunk like a fucking rock. Crack usage peaked under Clinton.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Crack didn't really became a huge problem until after Reagan was out of office. The homeless problem in the 1980s compared to now is a complete joke. Far, far worse now. Congress during all of Reagan's Presidency was controlled by Rats. How did he gut the mental health system without the Rats signing off on it.

    Then, as now, the Senate was majority Republican in 1981.
    Correct, I should have been more precise. The House, where all spending starts, was held by the Rats during all of Reagan's 8 years in office. Question still stands and of course you dodged it.
    Rhetorical questions don’t require answers, unless you have Aspergers, of course.
    It wasn't rhetorical. Come on Mr. History, how did Reagan gut the mental health system without the support of the House?
    blob, doesn’t know what a rhetorical question is. Sad!
    Kunt dodges the question and then claims it was rhetorical. When told it wasn't Kunt claims the other person doesn't understand the term.

    That's what Kunts do.

    If you're claiming Reagan gutted mental health, and she did, then the question still stands. How did he do this with a House that was controlled by the Rats?

    That's not a rhetorical question. That's a question you don't want to answer therefore we're treated to this Kunt act.
    Determined to prove me right. I approve of that.
    Gee. Dems only had 16 years and 2 friendly congresses at the outset of Clinton & Obama's terms, and yet those laws are still in place.

    Keep blaming Reagan, tho.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,219
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Crack didn't really became a huge problem until after Reagan was out of office. The homeless problem in the 1980s compared to now is a complete joke. Far, far worse now. Congress during all of Reagan's Presidency was controlled by Rats. How did he gut the mental health system without the Rats signing off on it.

    Then, as now, the Senate was majority Republican in 1981.
    Correct, I should have been more precise. The House, where all spending starts, was held by the Rats during all of Reagan's 8 years in office. Question still stands and of course you dodged it.
    Rhetorical questions don’t require answers, unless you have Aspergers, of course.
    It wasn't rhetorical. Come on Mr. History, how did Reagan gut the mental health system without the support of the House?
    blob, doesn’t know what a rhetorical question is. Sad!
    Kunt dodges the question and then claims it was rhetorical. When told it wasn't Kunt claims the other person doesn't understand the term.

    That's what Kunts do.

    If you're claiming Reagan gutted mental health, and she did, then the question still stands. How did he do this with a House that was controlled by the Rats?

    That's not a rhetorical question. That's a question you don't want to answer therefore we're treated to this Kunt act.
    Determined to prove me right. I approve of that.
    Still dodging the question like a Kunt. Could have easily predicted that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter