Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
UN issues warning - 10 years to climate catastophe
Options
Comments
-
Sledog said:
https://westernfreepress.com/aoc-we-must-tear-down-and-replace-every-building-in-america-jl/2001400ex said:
You can't have an intelligent discussion with someone who reads that article and thinks they are saying the Earth was going to end in 10 years. Or that AOC wants everyone to become vegetarian and rebuild every building in the country.RaceBannon said:
You do. You know its a party killer but like the good little lemming you are you're ready to go over the cliff2001400ex said:
It's always special when someone lies about someone else lying.RaceBannon said:
Why am I not surprised you're a shill for something you constantly try to lie about?2001400ex said:Why am I not surprised you don't even understand what they are saying. Back in 1989.
Fuck off liar!
you should really stop visiting bullshit sites like this one. it's not good for your blood pressure -
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint -
-
look at the master troll over hereMikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
good god you are embarrassing -
I heard Martin and Lewis are going to break up too.Sledog said: -
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
-
Rent free.MariotaTheGawd said:
look at the master troll over hereMikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
good god you are embarrassing -
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
-
wow ur smartMikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp. -
Ok. Cool broMariotaTheGawd said:
wow ur smartMikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp. -
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act -
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013 -
How cute. Mike thinks shit changes overnight.MikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013 -
2001400ex said:
How cute. Mike thinks shit changes overnight.MikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
Well. We had 10 years to make a change or else. 30 years later after the valliant effort in 1990 by the EPA, shit got worse.
Were they lying then or now? Dumbfuck.
But believe the dems now. This time shit got real. An a 28 year old person who’s last job was a bartender 2 years ago has the answers. And you WILL obey.
-
Do you know anything about current trajectory and changing the trajectory?MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
How cute. Mike thinks shit changes overnight.MikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
Well. We had 10 years to make a change or else. 30 years later after the valliant effort in 1990 by the EPA, shit got worse.
Were they lying then or now? Dumbfuck.
But believe the dems now. This time shit got real. An a 28 year old person who’s last job was a bartender 2 years ago has the answers. And you WILL obey. -
https://www.co2.earth/global-co2-emissions2001400ex said:
Do you know anything about current trajectory and changing the trajectory?MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
How cute. Mike thinks shit changes overnight.MikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
Well. We had 10 years to make a change or else. 30 years later after the valliant effort in 1990 by the EPA, shit got worse.
Were they lying then or now? Dumbfuck.
But believe the dems now. This time shit got real. An a 28 year old person who’s last job was a bartender 2 years ago has the answers. And you WILL obey.
The EPA saved us in 1990. Doing a hell of a job.
So there needed to be big cuts in CO2 between 1990 and 2000 or else - according to the U.N. 30 years later it’s up 60%. Now we REALLY need to do “something”.
Lying then or now? -
MikeDamone said:
https://www.co2.earth/global-co2-emissions2001400ex said:
Do you know anything about current trajectory and changing the trajectory?MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
How cute. Mike thinks shit changes overnight.MikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
Well. We had 10 years to make a change or else. 30 years later after the valliant effort in 1990 by the EPA, shit got worse.
Were they lying then or now? Dumbfuck.
But believe the dems now. This time shit got real. An a 28 year old person who’s last job was a bartender 2 years ago has the answers. And you WILL obey.
The EPA saved us in 1990. Doing a hell of a job.
So there needed to be big cuts in CO2 between 1990 and 2000 or else - according to the U.N. 30 years later it’s up 60%. Now we REALLY need to do “something”.
Lying then or now?
Lying then AND now.
-
the clean air act applies to other countries now? you should stick to pandering for upvotes because every time you try to talk with the adults you just end up embarrassing yourselfMikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013 -
Hey dumbshit. The initial link was a report was by the UN in reference to global warming. You do know what global means, right?MariotaTheGawd said:
the clean air act applies to other countries now? you should stick to pandering for upvotes because every time you try to talk with the adults you just end up embarrassing yourselfMikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
So HondoFS tries to refute the claim that nothing has been done by using the clean air act as proof that we really were doing something. Then your dumb ass comes in saying the clean air act is only for the US, making HondoFS look even dumber. If that’s even possible.
I know it’s hard for you, but I’m sure your post sounded good on your head. Should have pulled back though before the post button was pressed.
Shit lips.
