Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
UN issues warning - 10 years to climate catastophe
Comments
-
Yes and your statement saying we've done nothing the last 30 years is even more fucktarded.MikeDamone said:
Hey dumbshit. The initial link was a report was by the UN in reference to global warming. You do know what global means, right?MariotaTheGawd said:
the clean air act applies to other countries now? you should stick to pandering for upvotes because every time you try to talk with the adults you just end up embarrassing yourselfMikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
So HondoFS claims tries to refute the claim that nothing has been done by using the clean air act as proof that we really were doing something. Then your dumb ass comes in saying the clean air act is only for the US, making HondoFS look even dumber. If that’s even possible.
I know it’s hard for you, but I’m sure your post sounded good on your head. Should have pulled back though before the post button was pressed.
Shit lips. -
Clearly what was done was wildly successful. Have any other examples done in 1990 that warded off this disaster?2001400ex said:
Yes and your statement saying we've done nothing the last 30 years is even more fucktarded.MikeDamone said:
Hey dumbshit. The initial link was a report was by the UN in reference to global warming. You do know what global means, right?MariotaTheGawd said:
the clean air act applies to other countries now? you should stick to pandering for upvotes because every time you try to talk with the adults you just end up embarrassing yourselfMikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
So HondoFS claims tries to refute the claim that nothing has been done by using the clean air act as proof that we really were doing something. Then your dumb ass comes in saying the clean air act is only for the US, making HondoFS look even dumber. If that’s even possible.
I know it’s hard for you, but I’m sure your post sounded good on your head. Should have pulled back though before the post button was pressed.
Shit lips.
HondoFS - An act of Congress that sucked billions of dollars out of the economy while the issue trying to be solved gets worse. To him that’s doing something. To a rational human it isn’t doing shit.
Listen to your butt buddy mariorta. He was smart enough to understand the US isn’t the entire world.
-
NOGAF
The people who will be affected are in shithole countries anyway
End all asylum, close the borders from the south.
Piece of cake -
Someone should really warn the people of 1999
-
Exactly what percentage is billions of dollars compared to our GDP? Sounds scary man.MikeDamone said:
Clearly what was done was wildly successful. Have any other examples done in 1990 that warded off this disaster?2001400ex said:
Yes and your statement saying we've done nothing the last 30 years is even more fucktarded.MikeDamone said:
Hey dumbshit. The initial link was a report was by the UN in reference to global warming. You do know what global means, right?MariotaTheGawd said:
the clean air act applies to other countries now? you should stick to pandering for upvotes because every time you try to talk with the adults you just end up embarrassing yourselfMikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
So HondoFS claims tries to refute the claim that nothing has been done by using the clean air act as proof that we really were doing something. Then your dumb ass comes in saying the clean air act is only for the US, making HondoFS look even dumber. If that’s even possible.
I know it’s hard for you, but I’m sure your post sounded good on your head. Should have pulled back though before the post button was pressed.
Shit lips.
HondoFS - An act of Congress that sucked billions of dollars out of the economy while the issue trying to be solved gets worse. To him that’s doing something. To a rational human it isn’t doing shit.
Listen to your butt buddy mariorta. He was smart enough to understand the US isn’t the entire world. -
I will give you credit. If anyone knows something about moving the goal posts it is you.2001400ex said:
Do you know anything about current trajectory and changing the trajectory?MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
How cute. Mike thinks shit changes overnight.MikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
Well. We had 10 years to make a change or else. 30 years later after the valliant effort in 1990 by the EPA, shit got worse.
Were they lying then or now? Dumbfuck.
But believe the dems now. This time shit got real. An a 28 year old person who’s last job was a bartender 2 years ago has the answers. And you WILL obey. -
Sounds like you’d be a big defender of the wall based on that belief.2001400ex said:
Exactly what percentage is billions of dollars compared to our GDP? Sounds scary man.MikeDamone said:
Clearly what was done was wildly successful. Have any other examples done in 1990 that warded off this disaster?2001400ex said:
Yes and your statement saying we've done nothing the last 30 years is even more fucktarded.MikeDamone said:
Hey dumbshit. The initial link was a report was by the UN in reference to global warming. You do know what global means, right?MariotaTheGawd said:
the clean air act applies to other countries now? you should stick to pandering for upvotes because every time you try to talk with the adults you just end up embarrassing yourselfMikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
So HondoFS claims tries to refute the claim that nothing has been done by using the clean air act as proof that we really were doing something. Then your dumb ass comes in saying the clean air act is only for the US, making HondoFS look even dumber. If that’s even possible.
I know it’s hard for you, but I’m sure your post sounded good on your head. Should have pulled back though before the post button was pressed.
Shit lips.
HondoFS - An act of Congress that sucked billions of dollars out of the economy while the issue trying to be solved gets worse. To him that’s doing something. To a rational human it isn’t doing shit.
Listen to your butt buddy mariorta. He was smart enough to understand the US isn’t the entire world.
But yeah, $1 is too much on shit that does nothing to solve the problem. Typical leftist. Judges by intentions, not results. -
No that has nothing to do with why I didn't want "the wall" that Trump proposed. All I wanted to know is what were the dunes found to be used for and how it would reduce illegal immigration. And none of the wall supporters her could answer that.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’d be a big defender of the wall based on that belief.2001400ex said:
Exactly what percentage is billions of dollars compared to our GDP? Sounds scary man.MikeDamone said:
Clearly what was done was wildly successful. Have any other examples done in 1990 that warded off this disaster?2001400ex said:
Yes and your statement saying we've done nothing the last 30 years is even more fucktarded.MikeDamone said:
Hey dumbshit. The initial link was a report was by the UN in reference to global warming. You do know what global means, right?MariotaTheGawd said:
the clean air act applies to other countries now? you should stick to pandering for upvotes because every time you try to talk with the adults you just end up embarrassing yourselfMikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
So HondoFS claims tries to refute the claim that nothing has been done by using the clean air act as proof that we really were doing something. Then your dumb ass comes in saying the clean air act is only for the US, making HondoFS look even dumber. If that’s even possible.
I know it’s hard for you, but I’m sure your post sounded good on your head. Should have pulled back though before the post button was pressed.
Shit lips.
HondoFS - An act of Congress that sucked billions of dollars out of the economy while the issue trying to be solved gets worse. To him that’s doing something. To a rational human it isn’t doing shit.
Listen to your butt buddy mariorta. He was smart enough to understand the US isn’t the entire world.
But yeah, $1 is too much on shit that does nothing to solve the problem. Typical leftist. Judges by intentions, not results.
I do chuckle at your $1. Did you ever spend time in LA in the 80s and 90s? You think reducing smog is a bad thing? You are dumber than I thought. -
El oh el. Goal posts moved. Good job. HondoFS never disappoints.2001400ex said:
No that has nothing to do with why I didn't want "the wall" that Trump proposed. All I wanted to know is what were the dunes found to be used for and how it would reduce illegal immigration. And none of the wall supporters her could answer that.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’d be a big defender of the wall based on that belief.2001400ex said:
Exactly what percentage is billions of dollars compared to our GDP? Sounds scary man.MikeDamone said:
Clearly what was done was wildly successful. Have any other examples done in 1990 that warded off this disaster?2001400ex said:
Yes and your statement saying we've done nothing the last 30 years is even more fucktarded.MikeDamone said:
Hey dumbshit. The initial link was a report was by the UN in reference to global warming. You do know what global means, right?MariotaTheGawd said:
the clean air act applies to other countries now? you should stick to pandering for upvotes because every time you try to talk with the adults you just end up embarrassing yourselfMikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
So HondoFS claims tries to refute the claim that nothing has been done by using the clean air act as proof that we really were doing something. Then your dumb ass comes in saying the clean air act is only for the US, making HondoFS look even dumber. If that’s even possible.
I know it’s hard for you, but I’m sure your post sounded good on your head. Should have pulled back though before the post button was pressed.
Shit lips.
HondoFS - An act of Congress that sucked billions of dollars out of the economy while the issue trying to be solved gets worse. To him that’s doing something. To a rational human it isn’t doing shit.
Listen to your butt buddy mariorta. He was smart enough to understand the US isn’t the entire world.
But yeah, $1 is too much on shit that does nothing to solve the problem. Typical leftist. Judges by intentions, not results.
I do chuckle at your $1. Did you ever spend time in LA in the 80s and 90s? You think reducing smog is a bad thing? You are dumber than I thought.
You use the Clean air act as “doing someone” to reduce greenhouse gases, yet CO2 is at an alll time high 30 years later, but let’s talk a LA smog in LA. HondoFS is HondoFS. -
US CO2 is less than it was in 1990. And I've started a long time about doing nothing about India and China and others is not helping the situation. And Obama pussed out when he went to the table with them.MikeDamone said:
El oh el. Goal posts moved. Good job. HondoFS never disappoints.2001400ex said:
No that has nothing to do with why I didn't want "the wall" that Trump proposed. All I wanted to know is what were the dunes found to be used for and how it would reduce illegal immigration. And none of the wall supporters her could answer that.MikeDamone said:
Sounds like you’d be a big defender of the wall based on that belief.2001400ex said:
Exactly what percentage is billions of dollars compared to our GDP? Sounds scary man.MikeDamone said:
Clearly what was done was wildly successful. Have any other examples done in 1990 that warded off this disaster?2001400ex said:
Yes and your statement saying we've done nothing the last 30 years is even more fucktarded.MikeDamone said:
Hey dumbshit. The initial link was a report was by the UN in reference to global warming. You do know what global means, right?MariotaTheGawd said:
the clean air act applies to other countries now? you should stick to pandering for upvotes because every time you try to talk with the adults you just end up embarrassing yourselfMikeDamone said:
Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.2001400ex said:
We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.MikeDamone said:
What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.HHusky said:
Doubling down on dim. Nice!MikeDamone said:
It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.HHusky said:
This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.RaceBannon said:I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".
So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me
You didn’t disappoint
Might as well not even play the game.
Were they lying then, or now.
Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.
https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
So HondoFS claims tries to refute the claim that nothing has been done by using the clean air act as proof that we really were doing something. Then your dumb ass comes in saying the clean air act is only for the US, making HondoFS look even dumber. If that’s even possible.
I know it’s hard for you, but I’m sure your post sounded good on your head. Should have pulled back though before the post button was pressed.
Shit lips.
HondoFS - An act of Congress that sucked billions of dollars out of the economy while the issue trying to be solved gets worse. To him that’s doing something. To a rational human it isn’t doing shit.
Listen to your butt buddy mariorta. He was smart enough to understand the US isn’t the entire world.
But yeah, $1 is too much on shit that does nothing to solve the problem. Typical leftist. Judges by intentions, not results.
I do chuckle at your $1. Did you ever spend time in LA in the 80s and 90s? You think reducing smog is a bad thing? You are dumber than I thought.
You use the Clean air act as “doing someone” to reduce greenhouse gases, yet CO2 is at an alll time high 30 years later, but let’s talk a LA smog in LA. HondoFS is HondoFS.
I do like the "moving goal posts" when you decide you don't like the counter argument.
And I brought up LA because you were talking about American spending. You can't even remember your own talking points.
