Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UN issues warning - 10 years to climate catastophe

24567

Comments

  • MariotaTheGawdMariotaTheGawd Member Posts: 1,441
    edited March 2019
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Why am I not surprised you don't even understand what they are saying. Back in 1989.

    Why am I not surprised you're a shill for something you constantly try to lie about?
    It's always special when someone lies about someone else lying.
    You do. You know its a party killer but like the good little lemming you are you're ready to go over the cliff
    You can't have an intelligent discussion with someone who reads that article and thinks they are saying the Earth was going to end in 10 years. Or that AOC wants everyone to become vegetarian and rebuild every building in the country.
    https://westernfreepress.com/aoc-we-must-tear-down-and-replace-every-building-in-america-jl/

    Fuck off liar!

    you should really stop visiting bullshit sites like this one. it's not good for your blood pressure
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,338 Founders Club
  • MariotaTheGawdMariotaTheGawd Member Posts: 1,441

    HHusky said:

    I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".

    So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me

    This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.
    It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.

    You didn’t disappoint
    look at the master troll over here

    good god you are embarrassing
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,601

    HHusky said:

    I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".

    So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me

    This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.
    It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.

    You didn’t disappoint
    Doubling down on dim. Nice!
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,606 Swaye's Wigwam

    HHusky said:

    I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".

    So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me

    This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.
    It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.

    You didn’t disappoint
    look at the master troll over here

    good god you are embarrassing
    Rent free.
  • MariotaTheGawdMariotaTheGawd Member Posts: 1,441

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".

    So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me

    This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.
    It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.

    You didn’t disappoint
    Doubling down on dim. Nice!
    What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.

    Might as well not even play the game.

    Were they lying then, or now.

    Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
    wow ur smart
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".

    So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me

    This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.
    It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.

    You didn’t disappoint
    Doubling down on dim. Nice!
    What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.

    Might as well not even play the game.

    Were they lying then, or now.

    Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
    We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.

    Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
    Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.


    https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".

    So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me

    This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.
    It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.

    You didn’t disappoint
    Doubling down on dim. Nice!
    What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.

    Might as well not even play the game.

    Were they lying then, or now.

    Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
    We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.

    Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
    Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.


    https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
    Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.

    https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".

    So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me

    This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.
    It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.

    You didn’t disappoint
    Doubling down on dim. Nice!
    What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.

    Might as well not even play the game.

    Were they lying then, or now.

    Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
    We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.

    Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
    Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.


    https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
    Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.

    https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
    How cute. Mike thinks shit changes overnight.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".

    So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me

    This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.
    It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.

    You didn’t disappoint
    Doubling down on dim. Nice!
    What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.

    Might as well not even play the game.

    Were they lying then, or now.

    Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
    We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.

    Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
    Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.


    https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
    Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.

    https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
    How cute. Mike thinks shit changes overnight.

    Well. We had 10 years to make a change or else. 30 years later after the valliant effort in 1990 by the EPA, shit got worse.

    Were they lying then or now? Dumbfuck.

    But believe the dems now. This time shit got real. An a 28 year old person who’s last job was a bartender 2 years ago has the answers. And you WILL obey.
    Do you know anything about current trajectory and changing the trajectory?
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".

    So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me

    This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.
    It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.

    You didn’t disappoint
    Doubling down on dim. Nice!
    What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.

    Might as well not even play the game.

    Were they lying then, or now.

    Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
    We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.

    Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
    Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.


    https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
    Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.

    https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
    How cute. Mike thinks shit changes overnight.

    Well. We had 10 years to make a change or else. 30 years later after the valliant effort in 1990 by the EPA, shit got worse.

    Were they lying then or now? Dumbfuck.

    But believe the dems now. This time shit got real. An a 28 year old person who’s last job was a bartender 2 years ago has the answers. And you WILL obey.
    Do you know anything about current trajectory and changing the trajectory?
    https://www.co2.earth/global-co2-emissions

    The EPA saved us in 1990. Doing a hell of a job.

    So there needed to be big cuts in CO2 between 1990 and 2000 or else - according to the U.N. 30 years later it’s up 60%. Now we REALLY need to do “something”.

    Lying then or now?
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,294 Founders Club

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".

    So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me

    This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.
    It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.

    You didn’t disappoint
    Doubling down on dim. Nice!
    What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.

    Might as well not even play the game.

    Were they lying then, or now.

    Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
    We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.

    Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
    Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.


    https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
    Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.

    https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
    How cute. Mike thinks shit changes overnight.

    Well. We had 10 years to make a change or else. 30 years later after the valliant effort in 1990 by the EPA, shit got worse.

    Were they lying then or now? Dumbfuck.

    But believe the dems now. This time shit got real. An a 28 year old person who’s last job was a bartender 2 years ago has the answers. And you WILL obey.
    Do you know anything about current trajectory and changing the trajectory?
    https://www.co2.earth/global-co2-emissions

    The EPA saved us in 1990. Doing a hell of a job.

    So there needed to be big cuts in CO2 between 1990 and 2000 or else - according to the U.N. 30 years later it’s up 60%. Now we REALLY need to do “something”.

    Lying then or now?

    Lying then AND now.
  • MariotaTheGawdMariotaTheGawd Member Posts: 1,441

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".

    So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me

    This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.
    It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.

    You didn’t disappoint
    Doubling down on dim. Nice!
    What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.

    Might as well not even play the game.

    Were they lying then, or now.

    Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
    We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.

    Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
    Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.


    https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
    Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.

    https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
    the clean air act applies to other countries now? you should stick to pandering for upvotes because every time you try to talk with the adults you just end up embarrassing yourself
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited March 2019

    2001400ex said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I've gone over this with hondo more that once. Like you H, he just comes back with the same lies. Why bother? The GND is a piece of shit that hondo can't defend but he shills for it anyway attacking "conservatives".

    So yeah fuck off. If you're embarrassed by the GND take it out on AOC not me

    This is about Mikey's inability to comprehend an article he linked in a thread he started.
    It is? I thought it was about throwing meat to you retards.

    You didn’t disappoint
    Doubling down on dim. Nice!
    What’s to dumb down? 30 years ago we had 10 years to do something. We didn’t. So if we are already past the 10 year window, then we should stop spending money on the problem. No sense pouring good money down the hole after bad.

    Might as well not even play the game.

    Were they lying then, or now.

    Why is thy so hard for your pea brain to grasp.
    We didn't do anything in the 90s about climate change? I'd like to hear more about pea brains.

    Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
    Another set of major amendments to the Clean Air Act occurred in 1990 (1990 CAAA). The 1990 CAAA substantially increased the authority and responsibility of the federal government. New regulatory programs were authorized for control of acid deposition (acid rain) and for the issuance of stationary source operating permits. The NESHAPs were incorporated into a greatly expanded program for controlling toxic air pollutants. The provisions for attainment and maintenance of NAAQS were substantially modified and expanded. Other revisions included provisions regarding stratospheric ozone protection, increased enforcement authority, and expanded research programs.


    https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
    Imagine having such a pea brain that you don’t look at actual results of a government program.

    https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/chart-global-co2-emissions-rose-60-between-1990-and-2013
    the clean air act applies to other countries now? you should stick to pandering for upvotes because every time you try to talk with the adults you just end up embarrassing yourself
    Hey dumbshit. The initial link was a report was by the UN in reference to global warming. You do know what global means, right?

    So HondoFS tries to refute the claim that nothing has been done by using the clean air act as proof that we really were doing something. Then your dumb ass comes in saying the clean air act is only for the US, making HondoFS look even dumber. If that’s even possible.

    I know it’s hard for you, but I’m sure your post sounded good on your head. Should have pulled back though before the post button was pressed.

    Shit lips.
Sign In or Register to comment.