Paying their fair share update
Comments
-
kind of a bitch pussy move imo. grow a pair and stand by your beliefs.MikeDamone said:
The government provides an economy?allpurpleallgold said:
It is not mandatory that you have a job. You’re free to not pay taxes by not participating in the economy and work force that America provides you. You are aware of taxes and continue to work which is agreeing to the laws. Or you could make an income, not pay taxes and protest. But you don’t actually care enough to do that. Such a great injustice that the furthest you’ll go to fight it is post on a message board.MikeDamone said:
Or without threats and violence.... how much would you pay without threats? How much do you pay voluntarily? Zero is the answer. Ideas so good their mandatory!HHusky said:
Oh why can’t we have a tax system with no enforcement!?!? Sad!MikeDamone said:
Lieining is an aggression and violence. It’s the threat of volience from step 1.HHusky said:
Violence isn’t the first enforcement step. You should have just paid your taxes when they liened you.MikeDamone said:
No. I do not.HHusky said:
Mike now proposes Pay What You Want taxation.MikeDamone said:
What do you call it when someone takes your property under the threat of volience and without your consent?dflea said:
No it isn't.MikeDamone said:
and taxation is theft.greenblood said:All corporations should have zero tax. Corporate taxation is double taxation.
But that’s not a bad idea....if the ideas are so great, why do they need to be funded with violence?
I’m afraid of being murdered. So I pay. -
If only you could say what you're saying, then we'd really be cooking with gas!MikeDamone said:
Is that what I said? No it is not.HHusky said:
Well let’s all pay zero taxes, voluntarily of course, and see how things go.MikeDamone said:
No. I didn’t. You did.HHusky said:
And Mike has come full circle back to a government funded with hydrogen.MikeDamone said:
Or without threats and violence.... how much would you pay without threats? How much do you pay voluntarily? Zero is the answer. Ideas so good their mandatory!HHusky said:
Oh why can’t we have a tax system with no enforcement!?!? Sad!MikeDamone said:
Lieining is an aggression and violence. It’s the threat of volience from step 1.HHusky said:
Violence isn’t the first enforcement step. You should have just paid your taxes when they liened you.MikeDamone said:
No. I do not.HHusky said:
Mike now proposes Pay What You Want taxation.MikeDamone said:
What do you call it when someone takes your property under the threat of volience and without your consent?dflea said:
No it isn't.MikeDamone said:
and taxation is theft.greenblood said:All corporations should have zero tax. Corporate taxation is double taxation.
But that’s not a bad idea....if the ideas are so great, why do they need to be funded with violence?
Your use of the exaggeration fallacy is noted though. -
Your ad hominem argument is noted. Good one.BennyBeaver said:
kind of a bitch pussy move imo. grow a pair and stand by your beliefs.MikeDamone said:
The government provides an economy?allpurpleallgold said:
It is not mandatory that you have a job. You’re free to not pay taxes by not participating in the economy and work force that America provides you. You are aware of taxes and continue to work which is agreeing to the laws. Or you could make an income, not pay taxes and protest. But you don’t actually care enough to do that. Such a great injustice that the furthest you’ll go to fight it is post on a message board.MikeDamone said:
Or without threats and violence.... how much would you pay without threats? How much do you pay voluntarily? Zero is the answer. Ideas so good their mandatory!HHusky said:
Oh why can’t we have a tax system with no enforcement!?!? Sad!MikeDamone said:
Lieining is an aggression and violence. It’s the threat of volience from step 1.HHusky said:
Violence isn’t the first enforcement step. You should have just paid your taxes when they liened you.MikeDamone said:
No. I do not.HHusky said:
Mike now proposes Pay What You Want taxation.MikeDamone said:
What do you call it when someone takes your property under the threat of volience and without your consent?dflea said:
No it isn't.MikeDamone said:
and taxation is theft.greenblood said:All corporations should have zero tax. Corporate taxation is double taxation.
But that’s not a bad idea....if the ideas are so great, why do they need to be funded with violence?
I’m afraid of being murdered. So I pay. -
You seem upset.HHusky said:
If only you could say what you're saying, then we'd really be cooking with gas!MikeDamone said:
Is that what I said? No it is not.HHusky said:
Well let’s all pay zero taxes, voluntarily of course, and see how things go.MikeDamone said:
No. I didn’t. You did.HHusky said:
And Mike has come full circle back to a government funded with hydrogen.MikeDamone said:
Or without threats and violence.... how much would you pay without threats? How much do you pay voluntarily? Zero is the answer. Ideas so good their mandatory!HHusky said:
Oh why can’t we have a tax system with no enforcement!?!? Sad!MikeDamone said:
Lieining is an aggression and violence. It’s the threat of volience from step 1.HHusky said:
Violence isn’t the first enforcement step. You should have just paid your taxes when they liened you.MikeDamone said:
No. I do not.HHusky said:
Mike now proposes Pay What You Want taxation.MikeDamone said:
What do you call it when someone takes your property under the threat of volience and without your consent?dflea said:
No it isn't.MikeDamone said:
and taxation is theft.greenblood said:All corporations should have zero tax. Corporate taxation is double taxation.
But that’s not a bad idea....if the ideas are so great, why do they need to be funded with violence?
Your use of the exaggeration fallacy is noted though.
I’m saying that taxation is theft and is taken under the threat of violence. Did I stutter? I said that several posts ago.
-
Final answer?MikeDamone said:
You seem upset.HHusky said:
If only you could say what you're saying, then we'd really be cooking with gas!MikeDamone said:
Is that what I said? No it is not.HHusky said:
Well let’s all pay zero taxes, voluntarily of course, and see how things go.MikeDamone said:
No. I didn’t. You did.HHusky said:
And Mike has come full circle back to a government funded with hydrogen.MikeDamone said:
Or without threats and violence.... how much would you pay without threats? How much do you pay voluntarily? Zero is the answer. Ideas so good their mandatory!HHusky said:
Oh why can’t we have a tax system with no enforcement!?!? Sad!MikeDamone said:
Lieining is an aggression and violence. It’s the threat of volience from step 1.HHusky said:
Violence isn’t the first enforcement step. You should have just paid your taxes when they liened you.MikeDamone said:
No. I do not.HHusky said:
Mike now proposes Pay What You Want taxation.MikeDamone said:
What do you call it when someone takes your property under the threat of volience and without your consent?dflea said:
No it isn't.MikeDamone said:
and taxation is theft.greenblood said:All corporations should have zero tax. Corporate taxation is double taxation.
But that’s not a bad idea....if the ideas are so great, why do they need to be funded with violence?
Your use of the exaggeration fallacy is noted though. -
No. I added to that post.HHusky said:
Final answer?MikeDamone said:
You seem upset.HHusky said:
If only you could say what you're saying, then we'd really be cooking with gas!MikeDamone said:
Is that what I said? No it is not.HHusky said:
Well let’s all pay zero taxes, voluntarily of course, and see how things go.MikeDamone said:
No. I didn’t. You did.HHusky said:
And Mike has come full circle back to a government funded with hydrogen.MikeDamone said:
Or without threats and violence.... how much would you pay without threats? How much do you pay voluntarily? Zero is the answer. Ideas so good their mandatory!HHusky said:
Oh why can’t we have a tax system with no enforcement!?!? Sad!MikeDamone said:
Lieining is an aggression and violence. It’s the threat of volience from step 1.HHusky said:
Violence isn’t the first enforcement step. You should have just paid your taxes when they liened you.MikeDamone said:
No. I do not.HHusky said:
Mike now proposes Pay What You Want taxation.MikeDamone said:
What do you call it when someone takes your property under the threat of volience and without your consent?dflea said:
No it isn't.MikeDamone said:
and taxation is theft.greenblood said:All corporations should have zero tax. Corporate taxation is double taxation.
But that’s not a bad idea....if the ideas are so great, why do they need to be funded with violence?
Your use of the exaggeration fallacy is noted though. -
We all understood that is your position.MikeDamone said:
I’m saying that taxation is theft and is taken under the threat of violence. Did I stutter? I said that several posts ago.HHusky said:
If only you could say what you're saying, then we'd really be cooking with gas!MikeDamone said:
Is that what I said? No it is not.HHusky said:
Well let’s all pay zero taxes, voluntarily of course, and see how things go.MikeDamone said:
No. I didn’t. You did.HHusky said:
And Mike has come full circle back to a government funded with hydrogen.MikeDamone said:
Or without threats and violence.... how much would you pay without threats? How much do you pay voluntarily? Zero is the answer. Ideas so good their mandatory!HHusky said:
Oh why can’t we have a tax system with no enforcement!?!? Sad!MikeDamone said:
Lieining is an aggression and violence. It’s the threat of volience from step 1.HHusky said:
Violence isn’t the first enforcement step. You should have just paid your taxes when they liened you.MikeDamone said:
No. I do not.HHusky said:
Mike now proposes Pay What You Want taxation.MikeDamone said:
What do you call it when someone takes your property under the threat of volience and without your consent?dflea said:
No it isn't.MikeDamone said:
and taxation is theft.greenblood said:All corporations should have zero tax. Corporate taxation is double taxation.
But that’s not a bad idea....if the ideas are so great, why do they need to be funded with violence?
Your use of the exaggeration fallacy is noted though.
I think you're a simpleton. I should have made that explicit. My bad! -
Another ad hominem. Do you have an argument or just emotional outbursts? You seem frustrated.HHusky said:
We all understood that is your position.MikeDamone said:
I’m saying that taxation is theft and is taken under the threat of violence. Did I stutter? I said that several posts ago.HHusky said:
If only you could say what you're saying, then we'd really be cooking with gas!MikeDamone said:
Is that what I said? No it is not.HHusky said:
Well let’s all pay zero taxes, voluntarily of course, and see how things go.MikeDamone said:
No. I didn’t. You did.HHusky said:
And Mike has come full circle back to a government funded with hydrogen.MikeDamone said:
Or without threats and violence.... how much would you pay without threats? How much do you pay voluntarily? Zero is the answer. Ideas so good their mandatory!HHusky said:
Oh why can’t we have a tax system with no enforcement!?!? Sad!MikeDamone said:
Lieining is an aggression and violence. It’s the threat of volience from step 1.HHusky said:
Violence isn’t the first enforcement step. You should have just paid your taxes when they liened you.MikeDamone said:
No. I do not.HHusky said:
Mike now proposes Pay What You Want taxation.MikeDamone said:
What do you call it when someone takes your property under the threat of volience and without your consent?dflea said:
No it isn't.MikeDamone said:
and taxation is theft.greenblood said:All corporations should have zero tax. Corporate taxation is double taxation.
But that’s not a bad idea....if the ideas are so great, why do they need to be funded with violence?
Your use of the exaggeration fallacy is noted though.
I think you're a simpleton. I should have made that explicit. My bad! -
No, I can't possibly come up with anything as intellectually amusing as what you've already offered us. You win the internet!MikeDamone said:
Another ad hominem. Do you have an argument or just emotional outbursts? You seem frustrated.HHusky said:
We all understood that is your position.MikeDamone said:
I’m saying that taxation is theft and is taken under the threat of violence. Did I stutter? I said that several posts ago.HHusky said:
If only you could say what you're saying, then we'd really be cooking with gas!MikeDamone said:
Is that what I said? No it is not.HHusky said:
Well let’s all pay zero taxes, voluntarily of course, and see how things go.MikeDamone said:
No. I didn’t. You did.HHusky said:
And Mike has come full circle back to a government funded with hydrogen.MikeDamone said:
Or without threats and violence.... how much would you pay without threats? How much do you pay voluntarily? Zero is the answer. Ideas so good their mandatory!HHusky said:
Oh why can’t we have a tax system with no enforcement!?!? Sad!MikeDamone said:
Lieining is an aggression and violence. It’s the threat of volience from step 1.HHusky said:
Violence isn’t the first enforcement step. You should have just paid your taxes when they liened you.MikeDamone said:
No. I do not.HHusky said:
Mike now proposes Pay What You Want taxation.MikeDamone said:
What do you call it when someone takes your property under the threat of volience and without your consent?dflea said:
No it isn't.MikeDamone said:
and taxation is theft.greenblood said:All corporations should have zero tax. Corporate taxation is double taxation.
But that’s not a bad idea....if the ideas are so great, why do they need to be funded with violence?
Your use of the exaggeration fallacy is noted though.
I think you're a simpleton. I should have made that explicit. My bad! -
Christ..HHusky said:
No, I can't possibly come up with anything as intellectually amusing as what you've already offered us. You win the internet!MikeDamone said:
Another ad hominem. Do you have an argument or just emotional outbursts? You seem frustrated.HHusky said:
We all understood that is your position.MikeDamone said:
I’m saying that taxation is theft and is taken under the threat of violence. Did I stutter? I said that several posts ago.HHusky said:
If only you could say what you're saying, then we'd really be cooking with gas!MikeDamone said:
Is that what I said? No it is not.HHusky said:
Well let’s all pay zero taxes, voluntarily of course, and see how things go.MikeDamone said:
No. I didn’t. You did.HHusky said:
And Mike has come full circle back to a government funded with hydrogen.MikeDamone said:
Or without threats and violence.... how much would you pay without threats? How much do you pay voluntarily? Zero is the answer. Ideas so good their mandatory!HHusky said:
Oh why can’t we have a tax system with no enforcement!?!? Sad!MikeDamone said:
Lieining is an aggression and violence. It’s the threat of volience from step 1.HHusky said:
Violence isn’t the first enforcement step. You should have just paid your taxes when they liened you.MikeDamone said:
No. I do not.HHusky said:
Mike now proposes Pay What You Want taxation.MikeDamone said:
What do you call it when someone takes your property under the threat of volience and without your consent?dflea said:
No it isn't.MikeDamone said:
and taxation is theft.greenblood said:All corporations should have zero tax. Corporate taxation is double taxation.
But that’s not a bad idea....if the ideas are so great, why do they need to be funded with violence?
Your use of the exaggeration fallacy is noted though.
I think you're a simpleton. I should have made that explicit. My bad!


