Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Seriously?
Comments
-
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
-
So you got nothingBlu82 said:
Obviously, you need to take Hondo's "Read for Comprehension" class.HHusky said:
Which fact did I get wrong, Madam?Blu82 said:
Maybe someone could explain to you that you got caught trying to pass off a load of shit as bars of gold.HHusky said:
The issue is Constitutional, not political. I realize a guy who has sold his soul to a populist movement may not grasp it. Maybe someone there at your end could explain the issue to you.RaceBannon said:This is huge. The country is outraged. This has legs
Unbelievable what the liberal mind will buy into as fact.
What a dumb ass..... -
No because he wasn't a state employee. Do you think lying helps your case O'Keefed?HHusky said:Fact: he couldn’t have his clergyman in the room because he was not a Christian.
-
Seriously though, I mean, there's better hills to be making a fight on right?HHusky said:
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
The issue is that I'm sure they probably have limited personnel that attend to the "spiritual needs" of the captive population. Additionally, I'm sure there are procedures, laws, or liabilities involved around who is and isn't allowed in the room. Maybe(and this is speculation) they didn't feel like bending the rules for a child killer and they additionally were never going to hire an Imam full-time just to allow him to be there within the rules.
What do you want this to be? An issue of Christianinty's double standards? There are bigger better examples.
You want to pick a fight over the separation of church and state? Bigger fish to fry. Try school prayer instead.
The persecution of Muslim minorities? There's probably grosser examples of more deserving figures to be made light of.
TLDR, this is a dumb talking point. -
This is a Constitutional issue. If he was entitled to the same treatment as a Christian, it’s irrelevant how important the issue is to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Seriously though, I mean, there's better hills to be making a fight on right?HHusky said:
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
The issue is that I'm sure they probably have limited personnel that attend to the "spiritual needs" of the captive population. Additionally, I'm sure there are procedures, laws, or liabilities involved around who is and isn't allowed in the room. Maybe(and this is speculation) they didn't feel like bending the rules for a child killer and they additionally were never going to hire an Imam full-time just to allow him to be there within the rules.
What do you want this to be? An issue of Christianinty's double standards? There are bigger better examples.
You want to pick a fight over the separation of church and state? Bigger fish to fry. Try school prayer instead.
The persecution of Muslim minorities? There's probably grosser examples of more deserving figures to be made light of.
TLDR, this is a dumb talking point. -
-
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said: -
You've gotta be living in such a bubble to not realize that people's constitutional rights are violated on a regular basis. This is small potatoes.HHusky said:
This is a Constitutional issue. If he was entitled to the same treatment as a Christian, it’s irrelevant how important the issue is to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Seriously though, I mean, there's better hills to be making a fight on right?HHusky said:
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
The issue is that I'm sure they probably have limited personnel that attend to the "spiritual needs" of the captive population. Additionally, I'm sure there are procedures, laws, or liabilities involved around who is and isn't allowed in the room. Maybe(and this is speculation) they didn't feel like bending the rules for a child killer and they additionally were never going to hire an Imam full-time just to allow him to be there within the rules.
What do you want this to be? An issue of Christianinty's double standards? There are bigger better examples.
You want to pick a fight over the separation of church and state? Bigger fish to fry. Try school prayer instead.
The persecution of Muslim minorities? There's probably grosser examples of more deserving figures to be made light of.
TLDR, this is a dumb talking point.
But sure, let's hurt the cause for that by trying to hold up a child killer as a martyr.
For the record, I'm 110% behind protecting people's constitutional rights and a stricter interpretation of the constitution. I suggest we start with the first and second as those are foundational to the others. I'd also suggest a serious revamping of the 4th. -
Perfect fully automatic weapons for all? With no background checks or waiting period. You in?UW_Doog_Bot said:
You've gotta be living in such a bubble to not realize that people's constitutional rights are violated on a regular basis. This is small potatoes.HHusky said:
This is a Constitutional issue. If he was entitled to the same treatment as a Christian, it’s irrelevant how important the issue is to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Seriously though, I mean, there's better hills to be making a fight on right?HHusky said:
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
The issue is that I'm sure they probably have limited personnel that attend to the "spiritual needs" of the captive population. Additionally, I'm sure there are procedures, laws, or liabilities involved around who is and isn't allowed in the room. Maybe(and this is speculation) they didn't feel like bending the rules for a child killer and they additionally were never going to hire an Imam full-time just to allow him to be there within the rules.
What do you want this to be? An issue of Christianinty's double standards? There are bigger better examples.
You want to pick a fight over the separation of church and state? Bigger fish to fry. Try school prayer instead.
The persecution of Muslim minorities? There's probably grosser examples of more deserving figures to be made light of.
TLDR, this is a dumb talking point.
But sure, let's hurt the cause for that by trying to hold up a child killer as a martyr.
For the record, I'm 110% behind protecting people's constitutional rights and a stricter interpretation of the constitution. I suggest we start with the first and second as those are foundational to the others. I'd also suggest a serious revamping of the 4th. -
Sounds like socialism.2001400ex said:
Perfect fully automatic weapons for all? With no background checks or waiting period. You in?UW_Doog_Bot said:
You've gotta be living in such a bubble to not realize that people's constitutional rights are violated on a regular basis. This is small potatoes.HHusky said:
This is a Constitutional issue. If he was entitled to the same treatment as a Christian, it’s irrelevant how important the issue is to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Seriously though, I mean, there's better hills to be making a fight on right?HHusky said:
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
The issue is that I'm sure they probably have limited personnel that attend to the "spiritual needs" of the captive population. Additionally, I'm sure there are procedures, laws, or liabilities involved around who is and isn't allowed in the room. Maybe(and this is speculation) they didn't feel like bending the rules for a child killer and they additionally were never going to hire an Imam full-time just to allow him to be there within the rules.
What do you want this to be? An issue of Christianinty's double standards? There are bigger better examples.
You want to pick a fight over the separation of church and state? Bigger fish to fry. Try school prayer instead.
The persecution of Muslim minorities? There's probably grosser examples of more deserving figures to be made light of.
TLDR, this is a dumb talking point.
But sure, let's hurt the cause for that by trying to hold up a child killer as a martyr.
For the record, I'm 110% behind protecting people's constitutional rights and a stricter interpretation of the constitution. I suggest we start with the first and second as those are foundational to the others. I'd also suggest a serious revamping of the 4th. -
You know what I meant. But I'll rephrase. No more fully Auto registration or restrictions. No background checks or waiting period. You in?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sounds like socialism.2001400ex said:
Perfect fully automatic weapons for all? With no background checks or waiting period. You in?UW_Doog_Bot said:
You've gotta be living in such a bubble to not realize that people's constitutional rights are violated on a regular basis. This is small potatoes.HHusky said:
This is a Constitutional issue. If he was entitled to the same treatment as a Christian, it’s irrelevant how important the issue is to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Seriously though, I mean, there's better hills to be making a fight on right?HHusky said:
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
The issue is that I'm sure they probably have limited personnel that attend to the "spiritual needs" of the captive population. Additionally, I'm sure there are procedures, laws, or liabilities involved around who is and isn't allowed in the room. Maybe(and this is speculation) they didn't feel like bending the rules for a child killer and they additionally were never going to hire an Imam full-time just to allow him to be there within the rules.
What do you want this to be? An issue of Christianinty's double standards? There are bigger better examples.
You want to pick a fight over the separation of church and state? Bigger fish to fry. Try school prayer instead.
The persecution of Muslim minorities? There's probably grosser examples of more deserving figures to be made light of.
TLDR, this is a dumb talking point.
But sure, let's hurt the cause for that by trying to hold up a child killer as a martyr.
For the record, I'm 110% behind protecting people's constitutional rights and a stricter interpretation of the constitution. I suggest we start with the first and second as those are foundational to the others. I'd also suggest a serious revamping of the 4th. -
I don't give a shitHHusky said:
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said:
Sanctuary cities are a constitutional issue of far more importance
Stay in the weeds
He's dead. Get over it. -
And Hillary lost but you aren't over that yet.RaceBannon said:
I don't give a shitHHusky said:
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said:
Sanctuary cities are a constitutional issue of far more importance
Stay in the weeds
He's dead. Get over it. -
I'll chip in for their fee!UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
-
You don’t give a shit. Yet here you are.RaceBannon said:
I don't give a shitHHusky said:
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said:
Sanctuary cities are a constitutional issue of far more importance
Stay in the weeds
He's dead. Get over it. -
He's still dead
-
Constitutional issue? It’s already been litigated and trump lost.RaceBannon said:
I don't give a shitHHusky said:
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said:
Sanctuary cities are a constitutional issue of far more importance
Stay in the weeds
He's dead. Get over it.
California is a sanctuary state. LA and many other CA cities are sanctuary cities. Trump can fuck himself. -
The SC handed down a decision on Sanctuary cities? Got a link Kunt?CirrhosisDawg said:
Constitutional issue? It’s already been litigated and trump lost.RaceBannon said:
I don't give a shitHHusky said:
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said:
Sanctuary cities are a constitutional issue of far more importance
Stay in the weeds
He's dead. Get over it.
California is a sanctuary state. LA and many other CA cities are sanctuary cities. Trump can fuck himself.
Rats are just doing what they've always done. Standing in the school house doorways ignoring federal laws. -
Show me the appeal to the SC of trump’s loss imbecile. I am sure it’s in the docket. Right? Explain your constitutional theory that locals have to enforce federal law. Answer the question GayBob!SFGbob said:
The SC handed down a decision on Sanctuary cities? Got a link Kunt?CirrhosisDawg said:
Constitutional issue? It’s already been litigated and trump lost.RaceBannon said:
I don't give a shitHHusky said:
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said:
Sanctuary cities are a constitutional issue of far more importance
Stay in the weeds
He's dead. Get over it.
California is a sanctuary state. LA and many other CA cities are sanctuary cities. Trump can fuck himself.
Rats are just doing what they've always done. Standing in the school house doorways ignoring federal laws. -
Locals can't defy Federal law. But you Rats have a long history of succession and standing in school house doorways in defiance of Federal law.
-
What federal law is being defied GayBob? Where’s the scotus appeal GayBob?SFGbob said:Locals can't defy Federal law. But you Rats have a long history of succession and standing in school house doorways in defiance of Federal law.
California is a sanctuary state and there’s nothing you or trump can do about it. Suck it GayBob. -
Dumb fuck just claimed that Trump was trying to make state officials enforce Federal law and then sticks his head up his ass and ask what Federal law is being defied.
Stick to tonguing Hondo's ass dude, you're out of your league on most other topics. -
So sanctuary states and cities are completely legal. They exclusively enforce local law. Trump lost as badly on this issue in the courts as you are doing right now.SFGbob said:Dumb fuck just claimed that Trump was trying to make state officials enforce Federal law and then sticks his head up his ass and ask what Federal law is being defied.
Stick to tonguing Hondo's ass dude, you're out of your league on most other topics. -
You should appeal this constitutional issue to scotus.SFGbob said:Dumb fuck just claimed that Trump was trying to make state officials enforce Federal law and then sticks his head up his ass and ask what Federal law is being defied.
Stick to tonguing Hondo's ass dude, you're out of your league on most other topics.
😂😂😂😂 -
Sanctuary cities and states should be nuked.
-
Feds should make and enforce federal law.Pitchfork51 said:Sanctuary cities and states should be nuked.
Immigration is entirely a federal responsibility.
California DOJ, DAs, sheriffs and cops enforce local laws. The state does not have an immigration policy nor does it defy federal law.
Fat boy is supposed to enforce federal law. He won’t get one local jail cell or cop for his idiocy. It’s called federalism.
Have you trumptards stopped to consider why fat boy hasnt appealed his sanctuary law court losses? -
I believe this was the exact same argument that was used by the people who wanted to keep the "coloreds" out of their kids' schools.CirrhosisDawg said:
Feds should make and enforce federal law.Pitchfork51 said:Sanctuary cities and states should be nuked.
Immigration is entirely a federal responsibility.
California DOJ, DAs, sheriffs and cops enforce local laws. The state does not have an immigration policy nor does it defy federal law.
Fat boy is supposed to enforce federal law. He won’t get one local jail cell or cop for his idiocy. It’s called federalism.
Have you trumptards stopped to consider why fat boy hasnt appealed his sanctuary law court losses? -
Exact same argument? To an imbecile.SFGbob said:
I believe this was the exact same argument that was used by the people who wanted to keep the "coloreds" out of their kids' schools.CirrhosisDawg said:
Feds should make and enforce federal law.Pitchfork51 said:Sanctuary cities and states should be nuked.
Immigration is entirely a federal responsibility.
California DOJ, DAs, sheriffs and cops enforce local laws. The state does not have an immigration policy nor does it defy federal law.
Fat boy is supposed to enforce federal law. He won’t get one local jail cell or cop for his idiocy. It’s called federalism.
Have you trumptards stopped to consider why fat boy hasnt appealed his sanctuary law court losses?
Denying access to public schools is unconstitutional.
Telling trump to fuck off and enforce, staff and pay for his own MAGAtry is not unconstitutional. It’s not illegal. Immigration is not California’s responsibly you retard and we won’t pay a dime or lift a finger while trump is in office to promote this shitshow.
Why won’t fat boy appeal his sanctuary law court losses GayBob? Why won’t you answer the question?
-
They weren't denying them access to public schools. They were denying them access to a white public school. You Rats have always been about standing in the school house doorways.
You're parroting the exact same arguments the old Southern Rat racists used when the Feds tried to enforce Federal law.
Hardly shocking, you come off like a bigoted dumbfuck in most of your posts here. Good to see you drop the mask.
