Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Seriously?
Comments
-
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
-
So you got nothingBlu82 said:
Obviously, you need to take Hondo's "Read for Comprehension" class.HHusky said:
Which fact did I get wrong, Madam?Blu82 said:
Maybe someone could explain to you that you got caught trying to pass off a load of shit as bars of gold.HHusky said:
The issue is Constitutional, not political. I realize a guy who has sold his soul to a populist movement may not grasp it. Maybe someone there at your end could explain the issue to you.RaceBannon said:This is huge. The country is outraged. This has legs
Unbelievable what the liberal mind will buy into as fact.
What a dumb ass..... -
No because he wasn't a state employee. Do you think lying helps your case O'Keefed?HHusky said:Fact: he couldn’t have his clergyman in the room because he was not a Christian.
-
Seriously though, I mean, there's better hills to be making a fight on right?HHusky said:
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
The issue is that I'm sure they probably have limited personnel that attend to the "spiritual needs" of the captive population. Additionally, I'm sure there are procedures, laws, or liabilities involved around who is and isn't allowed in the room. Maybe(and this is speculation) they didn't feel like bending the rules for a child killer and they additionally were never going to hire an Imam full-time just to allow him to be there within the rules.
What do you want this to be? An issue of Christianinty's double standards? There are bigger better examples.
You want to pick a fight over the separation of church and state? Bigger fish to fry. Try school prayer instead.
The persecution of Muslim minorities? There's probably grosser examples of more deserving figures to be made light of.
TLDR, this is a dumb talking point. -
This is a Constitutional issue. If he was entitled to the same treatment as a Christian, it’s irrelevant how important the issue is to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Seriously though, I mean, there's better hills to be making a fight on right?HHusky said:
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
The issue is that I'm sure they probably have limited personnel that attend to the "spiritual needs" of the captive population. Additionally, I'm sure there are procedures, laws, or liabilities involved around who is and isn't allowed in the room. Maybe(and this is speculation) they didn't feel like bending the rules for a child killer and they additionally were never going to hire an Imam full-time just to allow him to be there within the rules.
What do you want this to be? An issue of Christianinty's double standards? There are bigger better examples.
You want to pick a fight over the separation of church and state? Bigger fish to fry. Try school prayer instead.
The persecution of Muslim minorities? There's probably grosser examples of more deserving figures to be made light of.
TLDR, this is a dumb talking point. -
-
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said: -
You've gotta be living in such a bubble to not realize that people's constitutional rights are violated on a regular basis. This is small potatoes.HHusky said:
This is a Constitutional issue. If he was entitled to the same treatment as a Christian, it’s irrelevant how important the issue is to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Seriously though, I mean, there's better hills to be making a fight on right?HHusky said:
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
The issue is that I'm sure they probably have limited personnel that attend to the "spiritual needs" of the captive population. Additionally, I'm sure there are procedures, laws, or liabilities involved around who is and isn't allowed in the room. Maybe(and this is speculation) they didn't feel like bending the rules for a child killer and they additionally were never going to hire an Imam full-time just to allow him to be there within the rules.
What do you want this to be? An issue of Christianinty's double standards? There are bigger better examples.
You want to pick a fight over the separation of church and state? Bigger fish to fry. Try school prayer instead.
The persecution of Muslim minorities? There's probably grosser examples of more deserving figures to be made light of.
TLDR, this is a dumb talking point.
But sure, let's hurt the cause for that by trying to hold up a child killer as a martyr.
For the record, I'm 110% behind protecting people's constitutional rights and a stricter interpretation of the constitution. I suggest we start with the first and second as those are foundational to the others. I'd also suggest a serious revamping of the 4th. -
Perfect fully automatic weapons for all? With no background checks or waiting period. You in?UW_Doog_Bot said:
You've gotta be living in such a bubble to not realize that people's constitutional rights are violated on a regular basis. This is small potatoes.HHusky said:
This is a Constitutional issue. If he was entitled to the same treatment as a Christian, it’s irrelevant how important the issue is to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Seriously though, I mean, there's better hills to be making a fight on right?HHusky said:
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
The issue is that I'm sure they probably have limited personnel that attend to the "spiritual needs" of the captive population. Additionally, I'm sure there are procedures, laws, or liabilities involved around who is and isn't allowed in the room. Maybe(and this is speculation) they didn't feel like bending the rules for a child killer and they additionally were never going to hire an Imam full-time just to allow him to be there within the rules.
What do you want this to be? An issue of Christianinty's double standards? There are bigger better examples.
You want to pick a fight over the separation of church and state? Bigger fish to fry. Try school prayer instead.
The persecution of Muslim minorities? There's probably grosser examples of more deserving figures to be made light of.
TLDR, this is a dumb talking point.
But sure, let's hurt the cause for that by trying to hold up a child killer as a martyr.
For the record, I'm 110% behind protecting people's constitutional rights and a stricter interpretation of the constitution. I suggest we start with the first and second as those are foundational to the others. I'd also suggest a serious revamping of the 4th.
