Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Seriously?
Comments
-
Sounds like socialism.2001400ex said:
Perfect fully automatic weapons for all? With no background checks or waiting period. You in?UW_Doog_Bot said:
You've gotta be living in such a bubble to not realize that people's constitutional rights are violated on a regular basis. This is small potatoes.HHusky said:
This is a Constitutional issue. If he was entitled to the same treatment as a Christian, it’s irrelevant how important the issue is to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Seriously though, I mean, there's better hills to be making a fight on right?HHusky said:
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
The issue is that I'm sure they probably have limited personnel that attend to the "spiritual needs" of the captive population. Additionally, I'm sure there are procedures, laws, or liabilities involved around who is and isn't allowed in the room. Maybe(and this is speculation) they didn't feel like bending the rules for a child killer and they additionally were never going to hire an Imam full-time just to allow him to be there within the rules.
What do you want this to be? An issue of Christianinty's double standards? There are bigger better examples.
You want to pick a fight over the separation of church and state? Bigger fish to fry. Try school prayer instead.
The persecution of Muslim minorities? There's probably grosser examples of more deserving figures to be made light of.
TLDR, this is a dumb talking point.
But sure, let's hurt the cause for that by trying to hold up a child killer as a martyr.
For the record, I'm 110% behind protecting people's constitutional rights and a stricter interpretation of the constitution. I suggest we start with the first and second as those are foundational to the others. I'd also suggest a serious revamping of the 4th. -
You know what I meant. But I'll rephrase. No more fully Auto registration or restrictions. No background checks or waiting period. You in?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sounds like socialism.2001400ex said:
Perfect fully automatic weapons for all? With no background checks or waiting period. You in?UW_Doog_Bot said:
You've gotta be living in such a bubble to not realize that people's constitutional rights are violated on a regular basis. This is small potatoes.HHusky said:
This is a Constitutional issue. If he was entitled to the same treatment as a Christian, it’s irrelevant how important the issue is to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Seriously though, I mean, there's better hills to be making a fight on right?HHusky said:
I’m rooting for you.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
The issue is that I'm sure they probably have limited personnel that attend to the "spiritual needs" of the captive population. Additionally, I'm sure there are procedures, laws, or liabilities involved around who is and isn't allowed in the room. Maybe(and this is speculation) they didn't feel like bending the rules for a child killer and they additionally were never going to hire an Imam full-time just to allow him to be there within the rules.
What do you want this to be? An issue of Christianinty's double standards? There are bigger better examples.
You want to pick a fight over the separation of church and state? Bigger fish to fry. Try school prayer instead.
The persecution of Muslim minorities? There's probably grosser examples of more deserving figures to be made light of.
TLDR, this is a dumb talking point.
But sure, let's hurt the cause for that by trying to hold up a child killer as a martyr.
For the record, I'm 110% behind protecting people's constitutional rights and a stricter interpretation of the constitution. I suggest we start with the first and second as those are foundational to the others. I'd also suggest a serious revamping of the 4th. -
I don't give a shitHHusky said:
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said:
Sanctuary cities are a constitutional issue of far more importance
Stay in the weeds
He's dead. Get over it. -
And Hillary lost but you aren't over that yet.RaceBannon said:
I don't give a shitHHusky said:
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said:
Sanctuary cities are a constitutional issue of far more importance
Stay in the weeds
He's dead. Get over it. -
I'll chip in for their fee!UW_Doog_Bot said:I'm a pastafarian. I would like my personal pirate officiant present if I were to be executed.
-
You don’t give a shit. Yet here you are.RaceBannon said:
I don't give a shitHHusky said:
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said:
Sanctuary cities are a constitutional issue of far more importance
Stay in the weeds
He's dead. Get over it. -
He's still dead
-
Constitutional issue? It’s already been litigated and trump lost.RaceBannon said:
I don't give a shitHHusky said:
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said:
Sanctuary cities are a constitutional issue of far more importance
Stay in the weeds
He's dead. Get over it.
California is a sanctuary state. LA and many other CA cities are sanctuary cities. Trump can fuck himself. -
The SC handed down a decision on Sanctuary cities? Got a link Kunt?CirrhosisDawg said:
Constitutional issue? It’s already been litigated and trump lost.RaceBannon said:
I don't give a shitHHusky said:
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said:
Sanctuary cities are a constitutional issue of far more importance
Stay in the weeds
He's dead. Get over it.
California is a sanctuary state. LA and many other CA cities are sanctuary cities. Trump can fuck himself.
Rats are just doing what they've always done. Standing in the school house doorways ignoring federal laws. -
Show me the appeal to the SC of trump’s loss imbecile. I am sure it’s in the docket. Right? Explain your constitutional theory that locals have to enforce federal law. Answer the question GayBob!SFGbob said:
The SC handed down a decision on Sanctuary cities? Got a link Kunt?CirrhosisDawg said:
Constitutional issue? It’s already been litigated and trump lost.RaceBannon said:
I don't give a shitHHusky said:
It’s just such an obvious call. Again, you could just take the position that no clergy enter the room.RaceBannon said:
Sanctuary cities are a constitutional issue of far more importance
Stay in the weeds
He's dead. Get over it.
California is a sanctuary state. LA and many other CA cities are sanctuary cities. Trump can fuck himself.
Rats are just doing what they've always done. Standing in the school house doorways ignoring federal laws.
