Where my code breakers at?
4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14
Comments
-
2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed
-
Trigger warning. Math ahead.
6, 6, 9, 10, 11, 10
no sequences of interest match this sequence.
4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14
Numbers n such that numbers 24n+11 are primes. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a(n) is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a(n) is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...
a(n+1) = smallest number greater a(n) that ends in binary representation with floor(a(n)/4); a(1)=1. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 29...
Numbers n such that 10^n - 71 is prime 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 22, 98... -
^filth
-
Is it just me, or does that look like Nicholas Cage's face photoshopped onto David Schwimmer's body?Bread said:Trigger warning. Math ahead.
6, 6, 9, 10, 11, 10
no sequences of interest match this sequence.
4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14
Numbers n such that numbers 24n+11 are primes. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a(n) is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a(n) is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...
a(n+1) = smallest number greater a(n) that ends in binary representation with floor(a(n)/4); a(1)=1. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 29...
Numbers n such that 10^n - 71 is prime 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 22, 98... -
I totally read that as code talkers, so naturally I was going to tag @Swaye.
-
Correct on the bottom sequence. Number of 247 composite (fuck off) blue chips in each Pete’s first 6 classes at UW.NEsnake12 said:2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed
-
EsophagealFeces said:
I totally read that as code talkers, so naturally I was going to tag @Swaye.
Those guys were Navajo nation. @Swaye ‘s
Cherokees actually created their own written language. -
Don't be fucking up my joke with your historical facts and shit, bro.YellowSnow said:EsophagealFeces said:I totally read that as code talkers, so naturally I was going to tag @Swaye.
Those guys were Navajo nation. @Swaye ‘s
Cherokees actually created their own written language.
-
Well now you can't convince me that that's not Nic Cage's face.EsophagealFeces said:
Is it just me, or does that look like Nicholas Cage's face photoshopped onto David Schwimmer's body?Bread said:Trigger warning. Math ahead.
6, 6, 9, 10, 11, 10
no sequences of interest match this sequence.
4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14
Numbers n such that numbers 24n+11 are primes. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a(n) is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a(n) is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...
a(n+1) = smallest number greater a(n) that ends in binary representation with floor(a(n)/4); a(1)=1. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 29...
Numbers n such that 10^n - 71 is prime 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 22, 98... -
this thread is worthless without roaddawg
-
Yes, he just might be the guy.WeakarmCobra said:this thread is worthless without roaddawg
-
Interesting stuffEsophagealFeces said:
Is it just me, or does that look like Nicholas Cage's face photoshopped onto David Schwimmer's body?Bread said:Trigger warning. Math ahead.
6, 6, 9, 10, 11, 10
no sequences of interest match this sequence.
4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14
Numbers n such that numbers 24n+11 are primes. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a(n) is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a(n) is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...
a(n+1) = smallest number greater a(n) that ends in binary representation with floor(a(n)/4); a(1)=1. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 29...
Numbers n such that 10^n - 71 is prime 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 22, 98...
-
So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.NEsnake12 said:2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed
-
I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.YellowSnow said:
So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.NEsnake12 said:2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed
-
Admittedly, I have a comparing Pete's early returns to Dabo's fetish. But, if Pete can continue to stock pile, 10 - 12 BCs per year, then we're basically recruiting at Clempson's level. I know we're all frustrated as hell with the lack of signature OOC win 5 years in, but we've got to stay the course and see what happens with the massive leveling up in talent. The class is NT level on the defensive side of the ball rather easily.HillsboroDuck said:
I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.YellowSnow said:
So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.NEsnake12 said:2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed
-
How many chances at signature wins were blown because of the talent definciency at QB?YellowSnow said:
Admittedly, I have a comparing Pete's early returns to Dabo's fetish. But, if Pete can continue to stock pile, 10 - 12 BCs per year, then we're basically recruiting at Clempson's level. I know we're all frustrated as hell with the lack of signature OOC win 5 years in, but we've got to stay the course and see what happens with the massive leveling up in talent. The class is NT level on the defensive side of the ball rather easily.HillsboroDuck said:
I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.YellowSnow said:
So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.NEsnake12 said:2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed
-
CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
How many chances at signature wins were blown because of the talent definciency at QB?YellowSnow said:
Admittedly, I have a comparing Pete's early returns to Dabo's fetish. But, if Pete can continue to stock pile, 10 - 12 BCs per year, then we're basically recruiting at Clempson's level. I know we're all frustrated as hell with the lack of signature OOC win 5 years in, but we've got to stay the course and see what happens with the massive leveling up in talent. The class is NT level on the defensive side of the ball rather easily.HillsboroDuck said:
I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.YellowSnow said:
So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.NEsnake12 said:2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed
-
Pete is a stubborn fuck but we need to move on from his getting it wrong on Jake as see if one of these other guys can play. I have faith.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
How many chances at signature wins were blown because of the talent definciency at QB?YellowSnow said:
Admittedly, I have a comparing Pete's early returns to Dabo's fetish. But, if Pete can continue to stock pile, 10 - 12 BCs per year, then we're basically recruiting at Clempson's level. I know we're all frustrated as hell with the lack of signature OOC win 5 years in, but we've got to stay the course and see what happens with the massive leveling up in talent. The class is NT level on the defensive side of the ball rather easily.HillsboroDuck said:
I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.YellowSnow said:
So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.NEsnake12 said:2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed
-
Ngata lot we can do other than watch this class develop and hope they close on their top targets the next couple years. Pete is safe - they continue to win 10+ a year and he can go without ever getting a signature win and he's not going to be fired.YellowSnow said:
Admittedly, I have a comparing Pete's early returns to Dabo's fetish. But, if Pete can continue to stock pile, 10 - 12 BCs per year, then we're basically recruiting at Clempson's level. I know we're all frustrated as hell with the lack of signature OOC win 5 years in, but we've got to stay the course and see what happens with the massive leveling up in talent. The class is NT level on the defensive side of the ball rather easily.HillsboroDuck said:
I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.YellowSnow said:
So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.NEsnake12 said:2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed
-
Does Gary Oldman get a royalty for the hundreds of times we've used this wonderful gif?GrundleStiltzkin said:CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
How many chances at signature wins were blown because of the talent definciency at QB?YellowSnow said:
Admittedly, I have a comparing Pete's early returns to Dabo's fetish. But, if Pete can continue to stock pile, 10 - 12 BCs per year, then we're basically recruiting at Clempson's level. I know we're all frustrated as hell with the lack of signature OOC win 5 years in, but we've got to stay the course and see what happens with the massive leveling up in talent. The class is NT level on the defensive side of the ball rather easily.HillsboroDuck said:
I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.YellowSnow said:
So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.NEsnake12 said:2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed
-
DerekJohnson said:
Does Gary Oldman get a royalty for the hundreds of times we've used this wonderful gif?GrundleStiltzkin said:CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
How many chances at signature wins were blown because of the talent definciency at QB?YellowSnow said:
Admittedly, I have a comparing Pete's early returns to Dabo's fetish. But, if Pete can continue to stock pile, 10 - 12 BCs per year, then we're basically recruiting at Clempson's level. I know we're all frustrated as hell with the lack of signature OOC win 5 years in, but we've got to stay the course and see what happens with the massive leveling up in talent. The class is NT level on the defensive side of the ball rather easily.HillsboroDuck said:
I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.YellowSnow said:
So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.NEsnake12 said:2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed
-
Nope. That's the dilemma. Pete is untouchable if he regularly wins 10+ and a Pac title every 3 years. You can't fire with this kind of performance, because the odds of getting someone who will do worse are higher than finding someone who will improve things. I remain steadfast in my belief that the talent infusion + better QB will yield the big time bowl wins in spite of that which we don't like about Pete.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Ngata lot we can do other than watch this class develop and hope they close on their top targets the next couple years. Pete is safe - they continue to win 10+ a year and he can go without ever getting a signature win and he's not going to be fired.YellowSnow said:
Admittedly, I have a comparing Pete's early returns to Dabo's fetish. But, if Pete can continue to stock pile, 10 - 12 BCs per year, then we're basically recruiting at Clempson's level. I know we're all frustrated as hell with the lack of signature OOC win 5 years in, but we've got to stay the course and see what happens with the massive leveling up in talent. The class is NT level on the defensive side of the ball rather easily.HillsboroDuck said:
I went back and researched Clemson's classes thinking it had to be them but didn't go back far enough. Good chit.YellowSnow said:
So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.NEsnake12 said:2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed
-
The comparison to Clemson works due to where Pete is now getting his blue chips - on the line
Now when we can get the blue chips like Nagta that Dabo has stacked up we will be CHAMPIONS like Clemson -
It's funny you mention that. Ross was a character inspired by some character Nicholas Cage played in a movie. The producers knew they wanted David Schwimmer for the role beforehand, while the rest of the characters they held auditions for.EsophagealFeces said:
Is it just me, or does that look like Nicholas Cage's face photoshopped onto David Schwimmer's body?Bread said:Trigger warning. Math ahead.
6, 6, 9, 10, 11, 10
no sequences of interest match this sequence.
4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14
Numbers n such that numbers 24n+11 are primes. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a(n) is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...
a(1)=3; for n>=2, a(n) is the smallest m>a(n-1) such that odd part of a(1) + ... + a(n-1) + m is prime. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 27...
a(n+1) = smallest number greater a(n) that ends in binary representation with floor(a(n)/4); a(1)=1. 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 29...
Numbers n such that 10^n - 71 is prime 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 22, 98...
If anyone has any other questions about Friends, just let me know.
-
Dabo had to get to playing for the Natty in year 7.5 and winning it in year 8.5 before he could come out west to get Ngata in his 11th recruiting cycle. These thing take time Abuelo.RaceBannon said:The comparison to Clemson works due to where Pete is now getting his blue chips - on the line
Now when we can get the blue chips like Nagta that Dabo has stacked up we will be CHAMPIONS like Clemson -
He won a natty with a gritty gutty Wes Welker type receiver
And Mike Williams
I'll settle for one Mike Williams for now -
#MeTooRaceBannon said:He won a natty with a gritty gutty Wes Welker type receiver
And Mike Williams
I'll settle for one Mike Williams for now -
I already said I’d be updating my recruiting trajectory Clemson comparison once Puka signed.YellowSnow said:
So the first sequence is the number of blue chips singed by Dabo in his first 6 recruiting classes. In years 4- 6 you'll see that Peterman has inked 33 blue chips compared to 31 for Dabo in years 4- 6. And in fact, Dabo has never had more than 13 (once) in a class. I found this really chinteresting given the general perception the Dabo is fun and can recruit better than Pete.NEsnake12 said:2nd number is UW's total # of blue chips signed
Why the fuck you gotta go steal my thunder @YellowSnow ?
