Now this thread is kind of on the rails. I'm going to look at the UW schedule for the first time (do we get the Wolverines at home this year?), and make an earnest prediction...
Ok that's pretty easy.
Wins: Kent St Pdx St Furd @ASU Arizona @ Cal OSU Colorado @ WSU
Yeah I'm a fucking doog. Duh. I have to be to keep expecting rhe best from the program after 30 years of getting mostly the worst
I think Lake really did squander 10 win talent. Most of it is still here. I think a good game day staff, this roster in shape and well coached, and a good system should be expected to battle for the conference title. If they don't then they aren't what I hoped.
MSU, too tough UCLA, CK breakout year. Cal, because it's Cal. UO, beat Oregon cause nothing else matters WSU, this is the year they win at home
8-4 if things bounce the Dogs way.
WSU, because it's in Pullman and possibly a snow game.
WSU lost their best player and made a lousy hire at coach. We? will lose at ASU (because desert - they had almost as long a streak against us as the Ducks), UCLA, and UO. They will lose one of the home games between OSU, Arizona or Stanford, but also win a game as an underdog. 7-5 seems like, and 8 wins is the ceiling unless Penix is in the running for the Heisman.
UW has the second easiest if not the easiest schedule in the conference. It's set up for them to have 9 wins and be in contention, along with UCLA.
USC and Oregon could contend as well but SC has major questions on defense and Oregon has major questions at quarterback and their coaching staff.
Utah is the safe pick but is the least talented out of the 5 and had some bad losses last year that indicates that aren't head and shoulders above anyone in the conference.
A 7 win UW team means they're losing to a lot of teams they shouldn't be. Going off of reputable models like Beta Rank UW is favored in 11/12 games so it's hard to see them doing that poorly.
Lol.......
Reputable models.
Fuck off.
46X laughing at beta rank while he mines for change in his couch so he can buy dip before he fires up the latest OnceADuck episode...
MSU, too tough UCLA, CK breakout year. Cal, because it's Cal. UO, beat Oregon cause nothing else matters WSU, this is the year they win at home
8-4 if things bounce the Dogs way.
WSU, because it's in Pullman and possibly a snow game.
WSU lost their best player and made a lousy hire at coach. We? will lose at ASU (because desert - they had almost as long a streak against us as the Ducks), UCLA, and UO. They will lose one of the home games between OSU, Arizona or Stanford, but also win a game as an underdog. 7-5 seems like, and 8 wins is the ceiling unless Penix is in the running for the Heisman.
UW has the second easiest if not the easiest schedule in the conference. It's set up for them to have 9 wins and be in contention, along with UCLA.
USC and Oregon could contend as well but SC has major questions on defense and Oregon has major questions at quarterback and their coaching staff.
Utah is the safe pick but is the least talented out of the 5 and had some bad losses last year that indicates that aren't head and shoulders above anyone in the conference.
A 7 win UW team means they're losing to a lot of teams they shouldn't be. Going off of reputable models like Beta Rank UW is favored in 11/12 games so it's hard to see them doing that poorly.
Lol.......
Reputable models.
Fuck off.
46X laughing at beta rank while he mines for change in his couch so he can buy dip before he fires up the latest OnceADuck episode...
MSU, too tough UCLA, CK breakout year. Cal, because it's Cal. UO, beat Oregon cause nothing else matters WSU, this is the year they win at home
8-4 if things bounce the Dogs way.
WSU, because it's in Pullman and possibly a snow game.
WSU lost their best player and made a lousy hire at coach. We? will lose at ASU (because desert - they had almost as long a streak against us as the Ducks), UCLA, and UO. They will lose one of the home games between OSU, Arizona or Stanford, but also win a game as an underdog. 7-5 seems like, and 8 wins is the ceiling unless Penix is in the running for the Heisman.
UW has the second easiest if not the easiest schedule in the conference. It's set up for them to have 9 wins and be in contention, along with UCLA.
USC and Oregon could contend as well but SC has major questions on defense and Oregon has major questions at quarterback and their coaching staff.
Utah is the safe pick but is the least talented out of the 5 and had some bad losses last year that indicates that aren't head and shoulders above anyone in the conference.
A 7 win UW team means they're losing to a lot of teams they shouldn't be. Going off of reputable models like Beta Rank UW is favored in 11/12 games so it's hard to see them doing that poorly.
4-8 to 7-5 would be an improvement and I’m not sure uw has gotten better at a single position other than maybe QB.
MSU, too tough UCLA, CK breakout year. Cal, because it's Cal. UO, beat Oregon cause nothing else matters WSU, this is the year they win at home
8-4 if things bounce the Dogs way.
WSU, because it's in Pullman and possibly a snow game.
WSU lost their best player and made a lousy hire at coach. We? will lose at ASU (because desert - they had almost as long a streak against us as the Ducks), UCLA, and UO. They will lose one of the home games between OSU, Arizona or Stanford, but also win a game as an underdog. 7-5 seems like, and 8 wins is the ceiling unless Penix is in the running for the Heisman.
UW has the second easiest if not the easiest schedule in the conference. It's set up for them to have 9 wins and be in contention, along with UCLA.
USC and Oregon could contend as well but SC has major questions on defense and Oregon has major questions at quarterback and their coaching staff.
Utah is the safe pick but is the least talented out of the 5 and had some bad losses last year that indicates that aren't head and shoulders above anyone in the conference.
A 7 win UW team means they're losing to a lot of teams they shouldn't be. Going off of reputable models like Beta Rank UW is favored in 11/12 games so it's hard to see them doing that poorly.
4-8 to 7-5 would be an improvement and I’m not sure uw has gotten better at a single position other than maybe QB.
Not that I'm surprised by this take, but that's completely false due to transfers alone.
Better coaching staff, better system, especially on the side of the ball that was historically bad due to scheme.
Best schedule in the conference.
There's 5 teams, 6 if you want to include Beavlet (I don't but many do) that can contend so if you're lazy you can say Utah and Oregon (despite the most questionable staff hires of any team and worst QB xfer) again but the conference doesn't work out like that most years.
MSU, too tough UCLA, CK breakout year. Cal, because it's Cal. UO, beat Oregon cause nothing else matters WSU, this is the year they win at home
8-4 if things bounce the Dogs way.
WSU, because it's in Pullman and possibly a snow game.
WSU lost their best player and made a lousy hire at coach. We? will lose at ASU (because desert - they had almost as long a streak against us as the Ducks), UCLA, and UO. They will lose one of the home games between OSU, Arizona or Stanford, but also win a game as an underdog. 7-5 seems like, and 8 wins is the ceiling unless Penix is in the running for the Heisman.
UW has the second easiest if not the easiest schedule in the conference. It's set up for them to have 9 wins and be in contention, along with UCLA.
USC and Oregon could contend as well but SC has major questions on defense and Oregon has major questions at quarterback and their coaching staff.
Utah is the safe pick but is the least talented out of the 5 and had some bad losses last year that indicates that aren't head and shoulders above anyone in the conference.
A 7 win UW team means they're losing to a lot of teams they shouldn't be. Going off of reputable models like Beta Rank UW is favored in 11/12 games so it's hard to see them doing that poorly.
4-8 to 7-5 would be an improvement and I’m not sure uw has gotten better at a single position other than maybe QB.
Not that I'm surprised by this take, but that's completely false due to transfers alone.
Better coaching staff, better system, especially on the side of the ball that was historically bad due to scheme.
Best schedule in the conference.
There's 5 teams, 6 if you want to include Beavlet (I don't but many do) that can contend so if you're lazy you can say Utah and Oregon (despite the most questionable staff hires of any team and worst QB xfer) again but the conference doesn't work out like that most years.
MSU, too tough UCLA, CK breakout year. Cal, because it's Cal. UO, beat Oregon cause nothing else matters WSU, this is the year they win at home
8-4 if things bounce the Dogs way.
WSU, because it's in Pullman and possibly a snow game.
WSU lost their best player and made a lousy hire at coach. We? will lose at ASU (because desert - they had almost as long a streak against us as the Ducks), UCLA, and UO. They will lose one of the home games between OSU, Arizona or Stanford, but also win a game as an underdog. 7-5 seems like, and 8 wins is the ceiling unless Penix is in the running for the Heisman.
UW has the second easiest if not the easiest schedule in the conference. It's set up for them to have 9 wins and be in contention, along with UCLA.
USC and Oregon could contend as well but SC has major questions on defense and Oregon has major questions at quarterback and their coaching staff.
Utah is the safe pick but is the least talented out of the 5 and had some bad losses last year that indicates that aren't head and shoulders above anyone in the conference.
A 7 win UW team means they're losing to a lot of teams they shouldn't be. Going off of reputable models like Beta Rank UW is favored in 11/12 games so it's hard to see them doing that poorly.
You are underdogs to state, Oregon, and ucla on every book for the game of the year lines. But favored in 11/12, sure.
MSU, too tough UCLA, CK breakout year. Cal, because it's Cal. UO, beat Oregon cause nothing else matters WSU, this is the year they win at home
8-4 if things bounce the Dogs way.
WSU, because it's in Pullman and possibly a snow game.
WSU lost their best player and made a lousy hire at coach. We? will lose at ASU (because desert - they had almost as long a streak against us as the Ducks), UCLA, and UO. They will lose one of the home games between OSU, Arizona or Stanford, but also win a game as an underdog. 7-5 seems like, and 8 wins is the ceiling unless Penix is in the running for the Heisman.
UW has the second easiest if not the easiest schedule in the conference. It's set up for them to have 9 wins and be in contention, along with UCLA.
USC and Oregon could contend as well but SC has major questions on defense and Oregon has major questions at quarterback and their coaching staff.
Utah is the safe pick but is the least talented out of the 5 and had some bad losses last year that indicates that aren't head and shoulders above anyone in the conference.
A 7 win UW team means they're losing to a lot of teams they shouldn't be. Going off of reputable models like Beta Rank UW is favored in 11/12 games so it's hard to see them doing that poorly.
You are underdogs to state, Oregon, and ucla on every book for the game of the year lines. But favored in 11/12, sure.
Not in many advanced models.
But I'm not going to get into Math and probability on a board where most of the knuckle dragging denizens here suck customer dick for a living.
MSU, too tough UCLA, CK breakout year. Cal, because it's Cal. UO, beat Oregon cause nothing else matters WSU, this is the year they win at home
8-4 if things bounce the Dogs way.
WSU, because it's in Pullman and possibly a snow game.
WSU lost their best player and made a lousy hire at coach. We? will lose at ASU (because desert - they had almost as long a streak against us as the Ducks), UCLA, and UO. They will lose one of the home games between OSU, Arizona or Stanford, but also win a game as an underdog. 7-5 seems like, and 8 wins is the ceiling unless Penix is in the running for the Heisman.
UW has the second easiest if not the easiest schedule in the conference. It's set up for them to have 9 wins and be in contention, along with UCLA.
USC and Oregon could contend as well but SC has major questions on defense and Oregon has major questions at quarterback and their coaching staff.
Utah is the safe pick but is the least talented out of the 5 and had some bad losses last year that indicates that aren't head and shoulders above anyone in the conference.
A 7 win UW team means they're losing to a lot of teams they shouldn't be. Going off of reputable models like Beta Rank UW is favored in 11/12 games so it's hard to see them doing that poorly.
You are underdogs to state, Oregon, and ucla on every book for the game of the year lines. But favored in 11/12, sure.
Not in many advanced models.
But I'm not going to get into Math and probability on a board where most of the knuckle dragging denizens here suck customer dick for a living.
You fired that shitty sales team you piss and moan about like a little girl? Sounds like your customers own your big brained engineering dorks.
JFC. Imagine not understanding probability vs expected outcome.
What a F'n Doog. Your wishful thinking is comical.
lol you're such a fucking retard. Most sites have UW 7 wins probable toward 8 which is taking into account some inexplicable losses. That assumes an average or below average coaching staff though. This isn't that, and fuck the usual hardcore husky bullshit around that. They can suck a dick.
Again, most of you fucks (green blood ntx and sfbob are cool) are retarded and are like "UW went 4-8 last year they'd be lucky to win 6 LOLOLOL SCO!" when the the people are really good at this (beta rank) disagree with you.
MSU, too tough UCLA, CK breakout year. Cal, because it's Cal. UO, beat Oregon cause nothing else matters WSU, this is the year they win at home
8-4 if things bounce the Dogs way.
WSU, because it's in Pullman and possibly a snow game.
WSU lost their best player and made a lousy hire at coach. We? will lose at ASU (because desert - they had almost as long a streak against us as the Ducks), UCLA, and UO. They will lose one of the home games between OSU, Arizona or Stanford, but also win a game as an underdog. 7-5 seems like, and 8 wins is the ceiling unless Penix is in the running for the Heisman.
UW has the second easiest if not the easiest schedule in the conference. It's set up for them to have 9 wins and be in contention, along with UCLA.
USC and Oregon could contend as well but SC has major questions on defense and Oregon has major questions at quarterback and their coaching staff.
Utah is the safe pick but is the least talented out of the 5 and had some bad losses last year that indicates that aren't head and shoulders above anyone in the conference.
A 7 win UW team means they're losing to a lot of teams they shouldn't be. Going off of reputable models like Beta Rank UW is favored in 11/12 games so it's hard to see them doing that poorly.
You are underdogs to state, Oregon, and ucla on every book for the game of the year lines. But favored in 11/12, sure.
Not in many advanced models.
But I'm not going to get into Math and probability on a board where most of the knuckle dragging denizens here suck customer dick for a living.
You think Vegas doesn’t use those same advanced models?
I get what you’re saying but I’ve yet to see a legit model where UW is favored at ucla, at Oregon, or vs. msu.
MSU, too tough UCLA, CK breakout year. Cal, because it's Cal. UO, beat Oregon cause nothing else matters WSU, this is the year they win at home
8-4 if things bounce the Dogs way.
WSU, because it's in Pullman and possibly a snow game.
WSU lost their best player and made a lousy hire at coach. We? will lose at ASU (because desert - they had almost as long a streak against us as the Ducks), UCLA, and UO. They will lose one of the home games between OSU, Arizona or Stanford, but also win a game as an underdog. 7-5 seems like, and 8 wins is the ceiling unless Penix is in the running for the Heisman.
UW has the second easiest if not the easiest schedule in the conference. It's set up for them to have 9 wins and be in contention, along with UCLA.
USC and Oregon could contend as well but SC has major questions on defense and Oregon has major questions at quarterback and their coaching staff.
Utah is the safe pick but is the least talented out of the 5 and had some bad losses last year that indicates that aren't head and shoulders above anyone in the conference.
A 7 win UW team means they're losing to a lot of teams they shouldn't be. Going off of reputable models like Beta Rank UW is favored in 11/12 games so it's hard to see them doing that poorly.
You are underdogs to state, Oregon, and ucla on every book for the game of the year lines. But favored in 11/12, sure.
Not in many advanced models.
But I'm not going to get into Math and probability on a board where most of the knuckle dragging denizens here suck customer dick for a living.
You think Vegas doesn’t use those same advanced models?
I get what you’re saying but I’ve yet to see a legit model where UW is favored at ucla, at Oregon, or vs. msu.
If they win 6-7 then I hope @HeretoBeatmyChest nightmare comes true and Nebraska poaches him after they fire Frost.
Comments
Ok that's pretty easy.
Wins:
Kent St
Pdx St
Furd
@ASU
Arizona
@ Cal
OSU
Colorado
@ WSU
Tossup...@ucla
Losses:
MSU
@ Oregon
Yeah I'm a fucking doog. Duh. I have to be to keep expecting rhe best from the program after 30 years of getting mostly the worst
I think Lake really did squander 10 win talent. Most of it is still here. I think a good game day staff, this roster in shape and well coached, and a good system should be expected to battle for the conference title. If they don't then they aren't what I hoped.
Go take your Ritalin.
Boi.
HUGE UPGRADE.
Penix will have to stay healthy.
If they have success with their easy schedule, will they be able to handle the expectations placed on them by the Tyee Club and Doogs?
Pete couldn’t handle the pressure.
Better coaching staff, better system, especially on the side of the ball that was historically bad due to scheme.
Best schedule in the conference.
There's 5 teams, 6 if you want to include Beavlet (I don't but many do) that can contend so if you're lazy you can say Utah and Oregon (despite the most questionable staff hires of any team and worst QB xfer) again but the conference doesn't work out like that most years.
But I'm not going to get into Math and probability on a board where most of the knuckle dragging denizens here suck customer dick for a living.
Again, most of you fucks (green blood ntx and sfbob are cool) are retarded and are like "UW went 4-8 last year they'd be lucky to win 6 LOLOLOL SCO!" when the the people are really good at this (beta rank) disagree with you.
I get what you’re saying but I’ve yet to see a legit model where UW is favored at ucla, at Oregon, or vs. msu.
I think that’s right about where they’ll sit. They’ll be lucky to win 8. Unlucky gets them another 4-win campaign.
Take your screenshots