Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Left is now outraged at Trump for releasing warrant

46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

"He didn't redact the names of the FBI agents on the warrant."

"He must be stopped."

"He's put a target on their back."

Kavanaugh says, "hold my beer."

Comments

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,286 Standard Supporter
    Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?

    Honest question.

    My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.

    Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.


  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,003
  • RezMuttJeffRezMuttJeff Member Posts: 89
    They are scared, they overreached like they always do. Biden has in one term lost two wars and angry parents are about to purge green haired teachers from their kid’s schools. Wait until the Covid and Trans trials start …
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,286 Standard Supporter

    Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?

    Honest question.

    My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.

    Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.


    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?

    It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.

    Fuck off.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,003
    Thud!

    Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?

    Honest question.

    My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.

    Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.


    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?

    It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.

    Fuck off.

    you miss the point

    imagine my surprise
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,003

    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?

    Honest question.

    My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.

    Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.


    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?

    It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.

    Fuck off.

    you miss the point

    imagine my surprise
    And that's another Throbber first down.

    congrats
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,635

    What I love is that the raid had nothing to do about January 6th or IRS allegations. But rather the possession of classified information of a past president. This is already backfiring in a shocking way.

    They had zero probable cause for Jan 6th to get a warrant but if they somehow "find" something.... how did that get there...
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,286 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?

    Honest question.

    My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.

    Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.


    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?

    It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.

    Fuck off.

    you miss the point

    imagine my surprise
    And that's another Throbber first down.

    congrats
    Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,003

    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?

    Honest question.

    My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.

    Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.


    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?

    It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.

    Fuck off.

    you miss the point

    imagine my surprise
    And that's another Throbber first down.

    congrats

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?

    Honest question.

    My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.

    Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.


    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?

    It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.

    Fuck off.

    you miss the point

    imagine my surprise
    And that's another Throbber first down.

    congrats
    Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.

    I'll wait for you to get your ammo.

    I'm sporting that way.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,252

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?

    Honest question.

    My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.

    Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.


    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?

    It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.

    Fuck off.

    you miss the point

    imagine my surprise
    And that's another Throbber first down.

    congrats
    Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.

    Weird how Dazzler can never give us the explanation for that.

    It’s as if Dazzler is no different than the moron in the video talking about how Trump needs to be in jail for all the provable crimes he has committed and then when asked to list those “crimes” he loses his voice
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,003
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?

    Honest question.

    My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.

    Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.


    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?

    It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.

    Fuck off.

    you miss the point

    imagine my surprise
    And that's another Throbber first down.

    congrats
    Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.

    Weird how Dazzler can never give us the explanation for that.

    It’s as if Dazzler is no different than the moron in the video talking about how Trump needs to be in jail for all the provable crimes he has committed and then when asked to list those “crimes” he loses his voice
    I'm gonna go check out those nuclear documents on my phone.

    It's no big deal!
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?

    Honest question.

    My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.

    Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.


    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?

    It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.

    Fuck off.

    you miss the point

    imagine my surprise
    And that's another Throbber first down.

    congrats
    Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.

    Weird how Dazzler can never give us the explanation for that.

    It’s as if Dazzler is no different than the moron in the video talking about how Trump needs to be in jail for all the provable crimes he has committed and then when asked to list those “crimes” he loses his voice
    I'm gonna go check out those nuclear documents on my phone.

    It's no big deal!
    The declassified ones?
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    Why would the recipient of a warrant be required to redact anything?

    Honest question.

    My guess is there will be no harassment of these agents while they are dining and no mobs outside their homes.

    Those are leftist tactics of intimidation.


    HHusky said:

    Thud!

    So you can't provide a cogent legal reason why a private party should redact a warrant?

    It's not my job to stop my offense, it's your job to stop my offense.

    Fuck off.

    you miss the point

    imagine my surprise
    And that's another Throbber first down.

    congrats
    Go work on your Russian state narrative homework, Dazzler.

    Weird how Dazzler can never give us the explanation for that.

    It’s as if Dazzler is no different than the moron in the video talking about how Trump needs to be in jail for all the provable crimes he has committed and then when asked to list those “crimes” he loses his voice
    I'm gonna go check out those nuclear documents on my phone.

    It's no big deal!
    The declassified ones?
    You should be more concerned with the Chinese owning the Big Guy.
Sign In or Register to comment.