Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Another leak

2

Comments

  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,711 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited August 2022
    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,003
    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,003

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Must

    Defend

    EVERYTHING
    ironic
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,285 Standard Supporter
    Serve the rest of the living presidents. Lay it out there for all to see.

    Or hide like bitches behind the deep state.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,003

    Serve the rest of the living presidents. Lay it out there for all to see.

    Or hide like bitches behind the deep state.

    ahhhh, deep state made Daddy do it.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,003
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.

    Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
    What force was used?

    The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,635
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.

    Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
    What force was used?

    The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
    Because maybe he didn't agree to it and it is a process not you raid a former President...
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,252
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.

    Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
    What force was used?

    The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
    You’re right, he should have bleach bitted it and then you be defending it.
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,635
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.

    Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
    What force was used?

    The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
    You’re right, he should have bleach bitted it and then you be defending it.
    You mean washed it with a rag
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,003
    Goduckies said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.

    Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
    What force was used?

    The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
    Because maybe he didn't agree to it and it is a process not you raid a former President...
    Former Presidents are above the law potd.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,252
    Goduckies said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.

    Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
    What force was used?

    The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
    You’re right, he should have bleach bitted it and then you be defending it.
    You mean washed it with a rag
    Dazzler actually had the gall to claim Hillary never lied to the public about her emails.
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,635
    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.

    Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
    What force was used?

    The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
    Because maybe he didn't agree to it and it is a process not you raid a former President...
    Former Presidents are above the law potd.
    What? When did he lose his 4th ammendment rights?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,003
    Goduckies said:

    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.

    Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
    What force was used?

    The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
    Because maybe he didn't agree to it and it is a process not you raid a former President...
    Former Presidents are above the law potd.
    What? When did he lose his 4th ammendment rights?
    Madam, the 4th Amendment does not say you are only subject to search if you feel like it.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,003
    SFGbob said:

    Goduckies said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.

    Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
    What force was used?

    The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
    You’re right, he should have bleach bitted it and then you be defending it.
    You mean washed it with a rag
    Dazzler actually had the gall to claim Hillary never lied to the public about her emails.

  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.

    Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
    What force was used?

    The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
    The FBI had the subpoena on June 19th when Trump let them have access. Do you ever get anything right?
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Goduckies said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.

    Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
    What force was used?

    The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
    You’re right, he should have bleach bitted it and then you be defending it.
    You mean washed it with a rag
    Dazzler actually had the gall to claim Hillary never lied to the public about her emails.

    Things a Hillary cuck would poast.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,003
    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.

    Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
    What force was used?

    The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
    The FBI had the subpoena on June 19th when Trump let them have access. Do you ever get anything right?
    Why did Daddy still have the stuff taken on Monday?
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,635
    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    SFGbob said:
    Obama has over 30 million pages under lock and key and has never been asked what they include.

    Just further evidence that we live in a two-tier justice system. One for the criminal Left and one for the accused Right. Prove me wrong.

    Those records were their on June 19th when the FBI spent all day reviewing what was stored at Mar-a-Lago. But when you have a failure in the WH, the economy in a recession, inflation at all time highs and poll numbers in the toilet, this distraction makes perfect sense.

    Banana Republic.
    Did you know that before Trump tweeted it out?
    No because nobody gave a fuck and Obama didn't have to deal with a weaponized Federal bureaucracy that was deadset on criminalizing and prosecuting the political opposition.
    What if they did something illegal? Time will tell, of course. I don’t proclaim like others that “they’ve got him this time” or “he’s going to be charged for sure.”
    There's zero precident for raiding someone's home in order to recover documents that are part of National Archive dispute. Sending 30 armed agents to a former President's home is fucking ridiculous but it's hardly shocking that you support it
    I never said it wasn’t ridiculous or that I support the force with which it was carried out. If it’s something as simple as a National Archives dispute, it seems excessive, sure. Apparently there’s connection to the Espionage Act? That seems relevant.

    I’ll reserve judgment on either side until there’s an actual charge or something better than a “leak” to WaPo, CNN, Fox, Tucker, Gateway Pundit, ZeroHedge, etc
    You can send two agents and be there a week, or 30 and get done in a day.

    "Force"?
    Should have sent a 1000, and knocked it out in 10 mins.

    Note that the very same bitch who cried about excessive force being used against rioters and arsonists now has no problem with the Feds raiding a private residence with “weapons of war” in order to secure documents they could have gotten through the normal subpoena process.
    What force was used?

    The stuff had been subpoenaed quite a while ago. Why did Daddy still have it?
    Because maybe he didn't agree to it and it is a process not you raid a former President...
    Former Presidents are above the law potd.
    What? When did he lose his 4th ammendment rights?
    Madam, the 4th Amendment does not say you are only subject to search if you feel like it.
    Correct but it establishes you from having a fishing expedition done to you like this... they violated that right because they found a sham judge.
Sign In or Register to comment.