”If you believe this kid got anything more than a nuisance fee settlement, you’re dreaming,” said national security law attorney Bradley P. Moss.
Ok.
Around $200-$250k for each settlement he got minimum. That's the cost to defend, and that's the minimum he'd get. Insurance adjusters do that all the time. Even in borderline frivolous lawsuits, insurance companies will settle for the cost to defend at minimum. If there is even a slight chance they could lose, they may add a multiple to that. If he settled with three media companies, I'd bet he got at least $600-$750k. Given that there was an outlier chance he'd win in court, he probably got close to $2 million in total. So yeah, that's pretty rich for a kid his age. Lawyers take 30%, and the kid keeps $1.4m tax free.
”If you believe this kid got anything more than a nuisance fee settlement, you’re dreaming,” said national security law attorney Bradley P. Moss.
Ok.
Around $200-$250k for each settlement he got minimum. That's the cost to defend, and that's the minimum he'd get. Insurance adjusters do that all the time. Even in borderline frivolous lawsuits, insurance companies will settle for the cost to defend at minimum. If there is even a slight chance they could lose, they may add a multiple to that. If he settled with three media companies, I'd bet he got at least $600-$750k. Given that there was an outlier chance he'd win in court, he probably got close to $2 million in total. So yeah, that's pretty rich for a kid his age. Lawyers take 30%, and the kid keeps $1.4m tax free.
Long read, but the article has a series of analyses as to why it’s nowhere near either of these amounts.
”If you believe this kid got anything more than a nuisance fee settlement, you’re dreaming,” said national security law attorney Bradley P. Moss.
Ok.
Around $200-$250k for each settlement he got minimum. That's the cost to defend, and that's the minimum he'd get. Insurance adjusters do that all the time. Even in borderline frivolous lawsuits, insurance companies will settle for the cost to defend at minimum. If there is even a slight chance they could lose, they may add a multiple to that. If he settled with three media companies, I'd bet he got at least $600-$750k. Given that there was an outlier chance he'd win in court, he probably got close to $2 million in total. So yeah, that's pretty rich for a kid his age. Lawyers take 30%, and the kid keeps $1.4m tax free.
Long read, but the article has a series of analyses as to why it’s nowhere near either of these amounts.
”If you believe this kid got anything more than a nuisance fee settlement, you’re dreaming,” said national security law attorney Bradley P. Moss.
Ok.
Around $200-$250k for each settlement he got minimum. That's the cost to defend, and that's the minimum he'd get. Insurance adjusters do that all the time. Even in borderline frivolous lawsuits, insurance companies will settle for the cost to defend at minimum. If there is even a slight chance they could lose, they may add a multiple to that. If he settled with three media companies, I'd bet he got at least $600-$750k. Given that there was an outlier chance he'd win in court, he probably got close to $2 million in total. So yeah, that's pretty rich for a kid his age. Lawyers take 30%, and the kid keeps $1.4m tax free.
Long read, but the article has a series of analyses as to why it’s nowhere near either of these amounts.
Clickbaity article. The headline sums it up "Some lawyers think". How many lawyers think that settling out of court means there's no case at all?
Would you mind not linking articles from msn.com as factual in the future?
Activist Nathan Phillips is not, was not and never has been a Vietnam veteran as stated in the article, you MORON.
Nathan Phillips joined the USMC Reserves on May 20, 1972. He was never deployed overseas. He ended his career in the military as a refrigeration tech, rank E-1 (as low as you can go) in 1976, i.e., he was kicked out for “disciplinary” issues. Phillips was also AWOL three times during his service.
Comments
Mr Sandmann’s lawyer, Todd McNurty told The Lexington Herald-Leader they were “disappointed” at the decision and intend to appeal it.
Oops
Nazi
What's True
The case was settled on Jan. 7, 2020.
What's Undetermined
The details of the settlement, including the actual amount of the monetary award, were not made public.
https://lawandcrime.com/media/some-lawyers-think-covington-catholics-nick-sandmann-walked-away-from-media-lawsuits-with-peanuts/amp/
”If you believe this kid got anything more than a nuisance fee settlement, you’re dreaming,” said national security law attorney Bradley P. Moss.
Ok.
The details of the settlement, including the actual amount of the monetary award, were not made public.
But still
I laffed. Keep up with the cope and wishcasting.
Activist Nathan Phillips is not, was not and never has been a Vietnam veteran as stated in the article, you MORON.
Nathan Phillips joined the USMC Reserves on May 20, 1972. He was never deployed overseas. He ended his career in the military as a refrigeration tech, rank E-1 (as low as you can go) in 1976, i.e., he was kicked out for “disciplinary” issues. Phillips was also AWOL three times during his service.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Phillips_(activist)
You love you some narratives . . . Bad = Good; Good = Bad.
Then imagine using snopes as your backup when snopes doesn't even bother to produce facts, only opinions.
You can't be this dumb can you mello?