But hearsay!
Comments
-
I really hate the fact that vanilla saves my previous half done responses to local storage
-
Any updates?HHusky said:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/secret-service-agents-who-tried-to-torpedo-hutchinson-testimony-lawyer-up-refuse-to-testify-panel/ar-AAZWJkH?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=39ff0f7ea3df4ceeb40c01bcefacb508
https://www.salon.com/2022/06/29/officials-disputed-cassidy-hutchinson-bombshell-testimony-were-trumps-yes-men-report/
I was assured they really, really want to testify.
#TugConRubes -
bump
-
Cassidy lied
Liz withheld the evidence
-
-
Everybody is lying except the gal who wasn’t there but heard something.
@HHusky’s favorite type of evidence is hearsay, not directly from those allegedly involved.. What an absolute dipshit. Sewer-level trolling.
-
Vindman heard a phone call
It's only going to get louder and more desperate as the dementia addled crook in the white house craters
-
Vindman testifying as to what he personally heard Daddy say isn’t hearsay. It’s direct evidence. Don’t quit your day job.
And as to Cassidy, you’re correct that she can’t be a witness to Daddy’s tantrum. That would be hearsay. Hearsay is used all the time in investigations however.
-
Note - it is the definition of hearsay. Vindman saying what he claims to have heard not backed up by any evidence or transcript. The same shit you have been falling for over the years again and again
What a shitty lawyer
