Personally, I find the concession that pawz doesn't know what hearsay is refreshing. Some of you other girls could learn a thing or two about honesty from your colleague.
There was no judge ruling on evidence before the J6 commission. You, as a lawyer, as were many on the J6 commission should know what the hearsay rules and exceptions are all about: Reliable, relevant evidence. The only question on the J6 commission's collective mind was whether evidence favored or disfavored Trump, and if it went against him, it came in, automatically.
Lift your head up once in awhile Dazzler. Your edges have gone dull.
Comments
Personally, I find the concession that pawz doesn't know what hearsay is refreshing. Some of you other girls could learn a thing or two about honesty from your colleague.
There was no judge ruling on evidence before the J6 commission. You, as a lawyer, as were many on the J6 commission should know what the hearsay rules and exceptions are all about: Reliable, relevant evidence. The only question on the J6 commission's collective mind was whether evidence favored or disfavored Trump, and if it went against him, it came in, automatically.
Lift your head up once in awhile Dazzler. Your edges have gone dull.
The Dazzler never tires of sucking off demonrats.
It was not a trial, (dumb) Shit.
Made that point loud and clear, you dumb faggot @HomoHusky.
Now finish your rim job on Ferguson.