It depends on what he means. If it's seizing property of the rich, taxing them 95%, & turning over a large amount of industry to the gubment, yes, he's a socialist. If it's rejecting the eradication of the middle class and trickle down economics, that's what most want.
It depends on what he means. If it's seizing property of the rich, taxing them 95%, & turning over a large amount of industry to the gubment, yes, he's a socialist. If it's rejecting the eradication of the middle class and trickle down economics, that's what most want.
"Trickle down economics " isn't a thing in economic.
It depends on what he means. If it's seizing property of the rich, taxing them 95%, & turning over a large amount of industry to the gubment, yes, he's a socialist. If it's rejecting the eradication of the middle class and trickle down economics, that's what most want.
It depends on what he means. If it's seizing property of the rich, taxing them 95%, & turning over a large amount of industry to the gubment, yes, he's a socialist. If it's rejecting the eradication of the middle class and trickle down economics, that's what most want.
"Trickle down#Turnup economics " isn't a thing in economic.
Comments
HTH.