Breaking news - R v. W sells couch
Comments
-
I've been in male birth control for 29 years.Pitchfork51 said:Male birth control would solve our problems
-
I wonUW_Doog_Bot said:Genuine or not I find @creepycoug arguments and logic interesting. If you can't beat him at this game then your arguments are shitty regardless of if he personally feels that way or not.
-
You were wrong. I care about not getting jammed up with child supportMikeDamone said:
Oh. I thought you meant the baby had a right to choose if it lived. My bad.Pitchfork51 said:
If she needs to flush that thing outMikeDamone said:
To chose what?Pitchfork51 said:Should be my right to choose imo
Eh the hysteria is overrated. Most likely it will end with states codifying time limits.
As it should have been for awhile -
The kids alive at conception. Applies and I agree they should have banned abortion.creepycoug said:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”WestlinnDuck said:creepycoug said:
I still cannot understand how people applaud handing this over to the states, which will leave us? with a patch-work of laws that will run the spectrum. [So?]Southerndawg said:
I think @Bob_C was being SarKastic.creepycoug said:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”Bob_C said:We lost our democracy today when an unelected court suggested they don’t have the power to legislate and that elected officials should determine the law. Sad day really.
HTH
There's a reason that no state, not even Mississippi, can legalize slavery. [Constitutional amendment #13 bars slavery in the US]. Same applies here. [It doesn't]
But, but, but social strife is irrelevant.
Good enough for me. If the constitution needs an amendment to clarify that it protects the lives of the innocent, then it's a piece of paper not worth wiping my ass with.
What you're really saying is that, if the states want to legalize the taking of innocent life, then they can until we amend the Constitution.
Is that where you sit on this issue?
Shame on you.
Don't want kids? Don't get knocked up. -
Meh. Forced abortions under certain income is my policy. Yes I am a facist. I don't care.Sledog said:
The kids alive at conception. Applies and I agree they should have banned abortion.creepycoug said:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”WestlinnDuck said:creepycoug said:
I still cannot understand how people applaud handing this over to the states, which will leave us? with a patch-work of laws that will run the spectrum. [So?]Southerndawg said:
I think @Bob_C was being SarKastic.creepycoug said:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”Bob_C said:We lost our democracy today when an unelected court suggested they don’t have the power to legislate and that elected officials should determine the law. Sad day really.
HTH
There's a reason that no state, not even Mississippi, can legalize slavery. [Constitutional amendment #13 bars slavery in the US]. Same applies here. [It doesn't]
But, but, but social strife is irrelevant.
Good enough for me. If the constitution needs an amendment to clarify that it protects the lives of the innocent, then it's a piece of paper not worth wiping my ass with.
What you're really saying is that, if the states want to legalize the taking of innocent life, then they can until we amend the Constitution.
Is that where you sit on this issue?
Shame on you. -
Killing people you created so you don't have to support them. How progressive!Pitchfork51 said:
You were wrong. I care about not getting jammed up with child supportMikeDamone said:
Oh. I thought you meant the baby had a right to choose if it lived. My bad.Pitchfork51 said:
If she needs to flush that thing outMikeDamone said:
To chose what?Pitchfork51 said:Should be my right to choose imo
Eh the hysteria is overrated. Most likely it will end with states codifying time limits.
As it should have been for awhile -
I'm not progressive at allMikeDamone said:
Killing people you created so you don't have to support them. How progressive!Pitchfork51 said:
You were wrong. I care about not getting jammed up with child supportMikeDamone said:
Oh. I thought you meant the baby had a right to choose if it lived. My bad.Pitchfork51 said:
If she needs to flush that thing outMikeDamone said:
To chose what?Pitchfork51 said:Should be my right to choose imo
Eh the hysteria is overrated. Most likely it will end with states codifying time limits.
As it should have been for awhile
What exactly gave you that idea. I've been on here for like 8 years lol -
Disagree. Killing inconvenient people is very progressive.Pitchfork51 said:
I'm not progressive at allMikeDamone said:
Killing people you created so you don't have to support them. How progressive!Pitchfork51 said:
You were wrong. I care about not getting jammed up with child supportMikeDamone said:
Oh. I thought you meant the baby had a right to choose if it lived. My bad.Pitchfork51 said:
If she needs to flush that thing outMikeDamone said:
To chose what?Pitchfork51 said:Should be my right to choose imo
Eh the hysteria is overrated. Most likely it will end with states codifying time limits.
As it should have been for awhile
What exactly gave you that idea. I've been on here for like 8 years lol -
I'm fascist.MikeDamone said:
Disagree. Killing inconvenient people is very progressive.Pitchfork51 said:
I'm not progressive at allMikeDamone said:
Killing people you created so you don't have to support them. How progressive!Pitchfork51 said:
You were wrong. I care about not getting jammed up with child supportMikeDamone said:
Oh. I thought you meant the baby had a right to choose if it lived. My bad.Pitchfork51 said:
If she needs to flush that thing outMikeDamone said:
To chose what?Pitchfork51 said:Should be my right to choose imo
Eh the hysteria is overrated. Most likely it will end with states codifying time limits.
As it should have been for awhile
What exactly gave you that idea. I've been on here for like 8 years lol
I believe I'm correct and most people are wrong. -
Tomato TamahtoPitchfork51 said:
I'm fascist.MikeDamone said:
Disagree. Killing inconvenient people is very progressive.Pitchfork51 said:
I'm not progressive at allMikeDamone said:
Killing people you created so you don't have to support them. How progressive!Pitchfork51 said:
You were wrong. I care about not getting jammed up with child supportMikeDamone said:
Oh. I thought you meant the baby had a right to choose if it lived. My bad.Pitchfork51 said:
If she needs to flush that thing outMikeDamone said:
To chose what?Pitchfork51 said:Should be my right to choose imo
Eh the hysteria is overrated. Most likely it will end with states codifying time limits.
As it should have been for awhile
What exactly gave you that idea. I've been on here for like 8 years lol
I believe I'm correct and most people are wrong.



