Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Show your support for what this community means to you:
Choose a Donation Amount
Username
(required for credit)
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Supreme Court strikes down New York gun law restricting concealed carry

Comments

  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 8,776
    Standard Supporter 5,000 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 5000 Comments
    Swaye said:

    Liberty 1. Libtards 0.

    So, Thomas can actually read the Constitution and is aware of the historical context of the 2A and the dazzler thinks he is a prop. The wise Latina votes for a dissent which ignores the Constitution and the historical context and is happy to restrict a key Constitutional right, make up a super Constitutional right which can't be restricted and would allow the limitation of the First Amendment so that its illegal to make a movie about PIPS.
    GDSMelloDawgGoduckies
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,495
    Swaye's Wigwam 2,500 Awesomes 1,500 Up Votes Sixth Anniversary
    Which conservative in name only voted with the dissent?
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 33,866
    Swaye's Wigwam 10,000 Awesomes 10,000 Up Votes Ninth Anniversary
    "Nobody needs a..."
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 45,646
    Swaye's Wigwam Solar Eclipse Donator 10,000 Awesomes 10,000 Up Votes
    RoadTrip said:

    Which conservative in name only voted with the dissent?

    I believe the vote was 6-3
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,891
    Swaye's Wigwam 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes 10000 Comments

    Going to need a liberal tears thred for today for this decision.

    Have the first one @MelloDawg



    haieSoutherndawgDooglespawz
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 8,776
    Standard Supporter 5,000 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 5000 Comments
    When you need to lie to make your point, maybe you don't have a point. Imagine being an "elite" journalist at America's supposed paper of record and not know a damn thing about what you are writing about. Geezus.

    https://instapundit.com/

    AS A FRIEND NOTES, YOU CAN TELL ALITO’S RESPONSE TO BREYER WAS EFFECTIVE BECAUSE THE NEW YORK TIMES IS MISREPRESENTING IT:



    huskyhooliganGDS
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 27,834
    10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes Standard Supporter 25000 Comments
    He left out that the decision was also issued during Pride Month. So it's both a racist and homophobic Court ruling.
    SledogGDS46XiJCAB
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 8,234
    Butler Cabin Supporter 2,500 Awesomes 1,500 Up Votes 5000 Comments

    Swaye said:

    Liberty 1. Libtards 0.

    So, Thomas can actually read the Constitution and is aware of the historical context of the 2A and the dazzler thinks he is a prop. The wise Latina votes for a dissent which ignores the Constitution and the historical context and is happy to restrict a key Constitutional right, make up a super Constitutional right which can't be restricted and would allow the limitation of the First Amendment so that its illegal to make a movie about PIPS.
    It's only a "living, breathing" document when it suits the Libs to bend it. Otherwise.
    MelloDawgSFGbob
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 27,834
    10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes Standard Supporter 25000 Comments
    Breyer's dissent captures the modern left in all of their glory. It's a straight up appeal to emotion.
    MelloDawgMikeDamoneGDSpawzUW_Doog_BotSledogBleachedAnusDawg46XiJCAB
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 21,367
    10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes Eighth Anniversary 10000 Comments
    You can tell how rattled Mello is from his voting
    UW_Doog_BotDerekJohnson46XiJCAB
Sign In or Register to comment.