Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Never forget

2

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    This thread delivers in the twisting department
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    HAHA, some of those replies are hilarious. This was a serious post:

    "Aubs there have been very few if any attacks on Petersen. You are all in 100% behind Petersen he was 92-12 and could do no wrong and there is nothing wrong with that.

    On the other hand there are some who are still excited and behind Petersen, but feel he could have hired some better assistants or assistants with more of a track record in the PAC 12 or any BCS conference when it comes to recruiting. We know that you can be a great coach, but you need to be able to recruit top athletes as well. Mike Riley is one hell of a football coach, but he doesn’t get many top recruits and without them you can see that middle of the pac is what you get. I also don’t believe anyone believes Pete won’t recruit top players, but does he have the dynamic recruiters who can successfully recruit top players? We do not know if he does or not it remains to be seen. Keeping Wilcox and Tosh would have gone a long way in people not having these questions."

    Holy shit. Know thy enemy.
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Someone needs to do a "Where are They Now?" on that commercial. How many of those kids still golf? How old are they now? Do they still look up to Eldrick? etc.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Gladstone said:

    We won the doog war. His work is done. Hope he's on a beach with his feet up somewhere. He earned it.

    This is how I feel about the Nega's winning the Doog war....

    image
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Gladstone said:

    HAHA, some of those replies are hilarious. This was a serious post:

    "Aubs there have been very few if any attacks on Petersen. You are all in 100% behind Petersen he was 92-12 and could do no wrong and there is nothing wrong with that.

    On the other hand there are some who are still excited and behind Petersen, but feel he could have hired some better assistants or assistants with more of a track record in the PAC 12 or any BCS conference when it comes to recruiting. We know that you can be a great coach, but you need to be able to recruit top athletes as well. Mike Riley is one hell of a football coach, but he doesn’t get many top recruits and without them you can see that middle of the pac is what you get. I also don’t believe anyone believes Pete won’t recruit top players, but does he have the dynamic recruiters who can successfully recruit top players? We do not know if he does or not it remains to be seen. Keeping Wilcox and Tosh would have gone a long way in people not having these questions."

    Holy shit. Know thy enemy.

    Love how Kim and every other Doog always says they aren't bashing on Petersen. Then they immediately write a passive aggressive essay bashing on Petersen making lame dick comparisons.

    They always bring up Hawkins, or a Riley or Whittingham. They never bring up Urban Meyer or Jim Tressel. Hell Brady Hoak is a fucktard but he won a BCS game year one and has been recruiting insane while he never did at smaller schools. Their silence on those guys always speaks volumes.

    Yet they say we have the "agenda". Fuck you Kim!
  • fivehundredmileDAWG
    fivehundredmileDAWG Member Posts: 1,212
    You assholes just want Petersen to keep winning and maybe grab a natty just so you can be RIGHT!!!!1!!11!!




















    .... Oh .... Wait ... Fuck me ...

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,422 Founders Club
    "There are those of us that feel that he maybe could have hired better assistants." Omfg were all those doogs shitting on Sark's first round of garbage assistants?