"There are those of us that feel that he maybe could have hired better assistants." Omfg were all those doogs shitting on Sark's first round of garbage assistants?
No, Sark assembled the best staff in the nation, remember?
HAHA, some of those replies are hilarious. This was a serious post:
"Aubs there have been very few if any attacks on Petersen. You are all in 100% behind Petersen he was 92-12 and could do no wrong and there is nothing wrong with that.
On the other hand there are some who are still excited and behind Petersen, but feel he could have hired some better assistants or assistants with more of a track record in the PAC 12 or any BCS conference when it comes to recruiting. We know that you can be a great coach, but you need to be able to recruit top athletes as well. Mike Riley is one hell of a football coach, but he doesn’t get many top recruits and without them you can see that middle of the pac is what you get. I also don’t believe anyone believes Pete won’t recruit top players, but does he have the dynamic recruiters who can successfully recruit top players? We do not know if he does or not it remains to be seen. Keeping Wilcox and Tosh would have gone a long way in people not having these questions."
Holy shit. Know thy enemy.
Who was the fucking bunghole who posted that shit? I hope that fucker is already on fire, whoever it was.
"There are those of us that feel that he maybe could have hired better assistants." Omfg were all those doogs shitting on Sark's first round of garbage assistants?
That argument, by itself, doesn't bother me. Doogs blowing Sark's mediocre staff until it was painfully obvious it sucked, while waiting and seeing w/ a 92-12 coach's is the hypocritical part.
Comments