You alleged Sled lied about his court experience and called him a mall cop, you stupid ass. I know the truth.
I’ve never been involved in a civil case . . . all criminal cases in federal court.
You’ve never been involved in a criminal case as a lawyer.
In my experience, each side can excuse a specified number of potential jurors. The rest of the questions posed by the judge are pretty standard.
Please don’t call anyone else a liar or throw out pejoratives in an attempt to demean Sled’s hard work and public service; particularly when you don’t know him and have zero experience in criminal court.
Since what you've described is jury selection in both civil and criminal matters, it is irrelevant that I have tried civil matters rather than criminal.
Sled claimed that jurors are excusedfor cause for any reason under the Sun. That's bullshit.
You alleged Sled lied about his court experience and called him a mall cop, you stupid ass. I know the truth.
I’ve never been involved in a civil case . . . all criminal cases in federal court.
You’ve never been involved in a criminal case as a lawyer.
In my experience, each side can excuse a specified number of potential jurors. The rest of the questions posed by the judge are pretty standard.
Please don’t call anyone else a liar or throw out pejoratives in an attempt to demean Sled’s hard work and public service; particularly when you don’t know him and have zero experience in criminal court.
Since what you've described is jury selection in both civil and criminal matters, it is irrelevant that I have tried civil matters rather than criminal.
Sled claimed that jurors are excusedfor cause for any reason under the Sun. That's bullshit.
One of the questions in the selection process: Do you know or have you had any contact with the prosecution team?
Woman who attended the same wedding said she had met me.
You alleged Sled lied about his court experience and called him a mall cop, you stupid ass. I know the truth.
I’ve never been involved in a civil case . . . all criminal cases in federal court.
You’ve never been involved in a criminal case as a lawyer.
In my experience, each side can excuse a specified number of potential jurors. The rest of the questions posed by the judge are pretty standard.
Please don’t call anyone else a liar or throw out pejoratives in an attempt to demean Sled’s hard work and public service; particularly when you don’t know him and have zero experience in criminal court.
Since what you've described is jury selection in both civil and criminal matters, it is irrelevant that I have tried civil matters rather than criminal.
Sled claimed that jurors are excusedfor cause for any reason under the Sun. That's bullshit.
One of the questions in the selection process: Do you know or have you had any contact with the prosecution team?
Woman who attended the same wedding said she had met me.
She was dismissed from the jury pool pronto.
First of all, she'd met you. That's a distinction right there.
Are you really telling me she was dismissed for cause without being asked anything else?
You alleged Sled lied about his court experience and called him a mall cop, you stupid ass. I know the truth.
I’ve never been involved in a civil case . . . all criminal cases in federal court.
You’ve never been involved in a criminal case as a lawyer.
In my experience, each side can excuse a specified number of potential jurors. The rest of the questions posed by the judge are pretty standard.
Please don’t call anyone else a liar or throw out pejoratives in an attempt to demean Sled’s hard work and public service; particularly when you don’t know him and have zero experience in criminal court.
Since what you've described is jury selection in both civil and criminal matters, it is irrelevant that I have tried civil mattersrather than criminal.
Sled claimed that jurors are excusedfor cause for any reason under the Sun. That's bullshit.
Thank you. File that for later when Gertrude says otherwise.
She was dismissed from the jury pool without follow-up questions.
All potential jurors are asked about criminal records. One guy said he could be impartial despite his criminal record. When asked what he had been convicted of: Rioting outside the Federal Courthouse in Eugene after the Rodney King verdict.
Dazzler talks about this shit. I've been on a case where a juror was thrown off because we went to the same high school that had over 2,600 students. Had no idea who the guy was.
Since we have no idea what the voir dire of that juror looked like, or whether the prosecution fought his being excused, so what?
How many criminal cases have you prosecuted or been a defense attorney in AFTER passing the Bar exam?
Feel free to explain how jury selection in a criminal case differs from jury selection in a civil matter.
Ever get the feeling the Dazzler doesn't want to answer questions about his lack of actual trial experience?
Fortunately his evasive lack of responses tell us all we need to know.
Dazzler talks about this shit. I've been on a case where a juror was thrown off because we went to the same high school that had over 2,600 students. Had no idea who the guy was.
Since we have no idea what the voir dire of that juror looked like, or whether the prosecution fought his being excused, so what?
How many criminal cases have you prosecuted or been a defense attorney in AFTER passing the Bar exam?
Feel free to explain how jury selection in a criminal case differs from jury selection in a civil matter.
Ever get the feeling the Dazzler doesn't want to answer questions about his lack of actual trial experience?
Fortunately his evasive lack of responses tell us all we need to know.
The vast majority of all cases never go to trial. And in the business/commercial arena, which I practice in, cases are more likely to be subject to arbitration by contract. I’ve arbitrated significantly more cases than I’ve tried.
Nonetheless, I have tried probably 15-20 cases and have directly observed or been involved in many times that range of jury selections.
Dazzler talks about this shit. I've been on a case where a juror was thrown off because we went to the same high school that had over 2,600 students. Had no idea who the guy was.
Since we have no idea what the voir dire of that juror looked like, or whether the prosecution fought his being excused, so what?
How many criminal cases have you prosecuted or been a defense attorney in AFTER passing the Bar exam?
Feel free to explain how jury selection in a criminal case differs from jury selection in a civil matter.
Ever get the feeling the Dazzler doesn't want to answer questions about his lack of actual trial experience?
Fortunately his evasive lack of responses tell us all we need to know.
The vast majority of all cases never go to trial. And in the business/commercial arena, which I practice in, cases are more likely to be subject to arbitration by contract. I’ve arbitrated significantly more cases than I’ve tried.
Nonetheless, I have tried probably 15-20 cases and have directly observed or been involved in many times that range of jury selections.
I bow to your greater experience, of course.
JFC ma'am. You should stop digging and take the L.
The only people who tried to rig the 2016 election were the Dems with a phony dossier. The gaslighting has been epic. Interesting that CNN and MSNBC aren't covering the trail.
Dazzler talks about this shit. I've been on a case where a juror was thrown off because we went to the same high school that had over 2,600 students. Had no idea who the guy was.
Since we have no idea what the voir dire of that juror looked like, or whether the prosecution fought his being excused, so what?
How many criminal cases have you prosecuted or been a defense attorney in AFTER passing the Bar exam?
Feel free to explain how jury selection in a criminal case differs from jury selection in a civil matter.
Ever get the feeling the Dazzler doesn't want to answer questions about his lack of actual trial experience?
Fortunately his evasive lack of responses tell us all we need to know.
The vast majority of all cases never go to trial. And in the business/commercial arena, which I practice in, cases are more likely to be subject to arbitration by contract. I’ve arbitrated significantly more cases than I’ve tried.
Nonetheless, I have tried probably 15-20 cases and have directly observed or been involved in many times that range of jury selections.
I bow to your greater experience, of course.
JFC ma'am. You should stop digging and take the L.
The only people who tried to rig the 2016 election were the Dems with a phony dossier. The gaslighting has been epic. Interesting that CNN and MSNBC aren't covering the trail.
NYTimes completely ignored Mook's testimony about Hillary signing off on pushing the bogus Alfa Bank story.
Dazzler talks about this shit. I've been on a case where a juror was thrown off because we went to the same high school that had over 2,600 students. Had no idea who the guy was.
Since we have no idea what the voir dire of that juror looked like, or whether the prosecution fought his being excused, so what?
How many criminal cases have you prosecuted or been a defense attorney in AFTER passing the Bar exam?
Feel free to explain how jury selection in a criminal case differs from jury selection in a civil matter.
Ever get the feeling the Dazzler doesn't want to answer questions about his lack of actual trial experience?
Fortunately his evasive lack of responses tell us all we need to know.
The vast majority of all cases never go to trial. And in the business/commercial arena, which I practice in, cases are more likely to be subject to arbitration by contract. I’ve arbitrated significantly more cases than I’ve tried.
Nonetheless, I have tried probably 15-20 cases and have directly observed or been involved in many times that range of jury selections.
I bow to your greater experience, of course.
“The vast majority of cases never go to trial . . .”
No shit, Batman.
BTW: We were discussing criminal prosecutions, NOT arbitration(s).
Please explain the circumstances where you have directly observed or have been involved in many times that range (15-20) of jury selections in cases that were not yours.
Dazzler talks about this shit. I've been on a case where a juror was thrown off because we went to the same high school that had over 2,600 students. Had no idea who the guy was.
Since we have no idea what the voir dire of that juror looked like, or whether the prosecution fought his being excused, so what?
How many criminal cases have you prosecuted or been a defense attorney in AFTER passing the Bar exam?
Feel free to explain how jury selection in a criminal case differs from jury selection in a civil matter.
Ever get the feeling the Dazzler doesn't want to answer questions about his lack of actual trial experience?
Fortunately his evasive lack of responses tell us all we need to know.
The vast majority of all cases never go to trial. And in the business/commercial arena, which I practice in, cases are more likely to be subject to arbitration by contract. I’ve arbitrated significantly more cases than I’ve tried.
Nonetheless, I have tried probably 15-20 cases and have directly observed or been involved in many times that range of jury selections.
I bow to your greater experience, of course.
“The vast majority of cases never go to trial . . .”
No shit, Batman.
BTW: We were discussing criminal prosecution, NOT arbitration(s).
Do I detect a lack of civility on your part after you expressly complained about my civility or lack thereof?
The issue was jury selection. You have been free to state any reason why my experience selecting juries is not applicable to a criminal jury selection. You have chosen not to do so. I know why you haven't; so do you.
That’s it? The scandal is that one juror’s daughter may know Sussman’s daughter?
Yuge!
People who are connected to the defendant are always tossed. Always. Just like cops are always tossed. Or anyone related to cops. Anyone that knows a cop. Strange you know nothing about how this shit works.
Mall Cop, judges aren’t tossing jurors for cause on a 6 Degrees of Kevin Bacon analysis.
Why sure. I have zero experience in a courtroom. Only the Dazzler can imagine an aquaintance being accepted as a juror. Ever had kids on team? Oh shit no you haven't anal birth isn't a thing.
So you assume they were acquainted. Yet the lawyers were permitted to question her about this "connection" and the most they got was that they were in the same rowing program.
How many girls are in the program?
Do the girls know each other?
Are they friends?
Are they in the same boat?
Do you know the Defendant?
Have you met him?
Let's see the transcript before you assume the juror was sleeping with the Defendant, shall we Mall Cop?
Maybe try some lawyering. It's like allowing jurors on the jury who donated to this guys employer and idolizer her. Fuck you really are clueless!
So we're done talking about parents of kids on teams, I see.
Since you have no children you are clueless on contact among teams and families. I have rather extensive experience here. You have contact. Frequently with teammate parents. Events, games, practice, gatherings, parties etc. etc.
Madam, these parents had never met. Your current position that they may have brushed shoulders at some point in time is less than compelling.
Transcript?
Jurors are allowed to be kicked for zero reason. This judge is packing the jury. You deny this is all anyone needs to see. Any means necessary comrade!
You've obviously lied about your courtroom experience, Mall Cop.
Now that it’s been established you know little, if anything, about the practice of criminal law in state or federal court, how about apologizing to the retired Peace Officer, you blowhard?
That’s it? The scandal is that one juror’s daughter may know Sussman’s daughter?
Yuge!
People who are connected to the defendant are always tossed. Always. Just like cops are always tossed. Or anyone related to cops. Anyone that knows a cop. Strange you know nothing about how this shit works.
Mall Cop, judges aren’t tossing jurors for cause on a 6 Degrees of Kevin Bacon analysis.
Why sure. I have zero experience in a courtroom. Only the Dazzler can imagine an aquaintance being accepted as a juror. Ever had kids on team? Oh shit no you haven't anal birth isn't a thing.
So you assume they were acquainted. Yet the lawyers were permitted to question her about this "connection" and the most they got was that they were in the same rowing program.
How many girls are in the program?
Do the girls know each other?
Are they friends?
Are they in the same boat?
Do you know the Defendant?
Have you met him?
Let's see the transcript before you assume the juror was sleeping with the Defendant, shall we Mall Cop?
Maybe try some lawyering. It's like allowing jurors on the jury who donated to this guys employer and idolizer her. Fuck you really are clueless!
So we're done talking about parents of kids on teams, I see.
Since you have no children you are clueless on contact among teams and families. I have rather extensive experience here. You have contact. Frequently with teammate parents. Events, games, practice, gatherings, parties etc. etc.
Madam, these parents had never met. Your current position that they may have brushed shoulders at some point in time is less than compelling.
Transcript?
Jurors are allowed to be kicked for zero reason. This judge is packing the jury. You deny this is all anyone needs to see. Any means necessary comrade!
You've obviously lied about your courtroom experience, Mall Cop.
Now that it’s been established you know little, if anything, about the practice of criminal law in state or federal court, how about apologizing to the retired Peace Officer, you blowhard?
That’s it? The scandal is that one juror’s daughter may know Sussman’s daughter?
Yuge!
People who are connected to the defendant are always tossed. Always. Just like cops are always tossed. Or anyone related to cops. Anyone that knows a cop. Strange you know nothing about how this shit works.
Mall Cop, judges aren’t tossing jurors for cause on a 6 Degrees of Kevin Bacon analysis.
Why sure. I have zero experience in a courtroom. Only the Dazzler can imagine an aquaintance being accepted as a juror. Ever had kids on team? Oh shit no you haven't anal birth isn't a thing.
So you assume they were acquainted. Yet the lawyers were permitted to question her about this "connection" and the most they got was that they were in the same rowing program.
How many girls are in the program?
Do the girls know each other?
Are they friends?
Are they in the same boat?
Do you know the Defendant?
Have you met him?
Let's see the transcript before you assume the juror was sleeping with the Defendant, shall we Mall Cop?
Maybe try some lawyering. It's like allowing jurors on the jury who donated to this guys employer and idolizer her. Fuck you really are clueless!
So we're done talking about parents of kids on teams, I see.
Since you have no children you are clueless on contact among teams and families. I have rather extensive experience here. You have contact. Frequently with teammate parents. Events, games, practice, gatherings, parties etc. etc.
Madam, these parents had never met. Your current position that they may have brushed shoulders at some point in time is less than compelling.
Transcript?
Jurors are allowed to be kicked for zero reason. This judge is packing the jury. You deny this is all anyone needs to see. Any means necessary comrade!
You've obviously lied about your courtroom experience, Mall Cop.
You’ve proven which of you lacks courtroom experience.
That’s it? The scandal is that one juror’s daughter may know Sussman’s daughter?
Yuge!
People who are connected to the defendant are always tossed. Always. Just like cops are always tossed. Or anyone related to cops. Anyone that knows a cop. Strange you know nothing about how this shit works.
Mall Cop, judges aren’t tossing jurors for cause on a 6 Degrees of Kevin Bacon analysis.
Why sure. I have zero experience in a courtroom. Only the Dazzler can imagine an aquaintance being accepted as a juror. Ever had kids on team? Oh shit no you haven't anal birth isn't a thing.
So you assume they were acquainted. Yet the lawyers were permitted to question her about this "connection" and the most they got was that they were in the same rowing program.
How many girls are in the program?
Do the girls know each other?
Are they friends?
Are they in the same boat?
Do you know the Defendant?
Have you met him?
Let's see the transcript before you assume the juror was sleeping with the Defendant, shall we Mall Cop?
Maybe try some lawyering. It's like allowing jurors on the jury who donated to this guys employer and idolizer her. Fuck you really are clueless!
So we're done talking about parents of kids on teams, I see.
Since you have no children you are clueless on contact among teams and families. I have rather extensive experience here. You have contact. Frequently with teammate parents. Events, games, practice, gatherings, parties etc. etc.
Madam, these parents had never met. Your current position that they may have brushed shoulders at some point in time is less than compelling.
Transcript?
Jurors are allowed to be kicked for zero reason. This judge is packing the jury. You deny this is all anyone needs to see. Any means necessary comrade!
You've obviously lied about your courtroom experience, Mall Cop.
You’ve proven which of you lacks courtroom experience.
Comments
Sled claimed that jurors are excused for cause for any reason under the Sun. That's bullshit.
Do you know or have you had any contact with the prosecution team?
Woman who attended the same wedding said she had met me.
She was dismissed from the jury pool pronto.
Are you really telling me she was dismissed for cause without being asked anything else?
All potential jurors are asked about criminal records. One guy said he could be impartial despite his criminal record. When asked what he had been convicted of: Rioting outside the Federal Courthouse in Eugene after the Rodney King verdict.
Fortunately his evasive lack of responses tell us all we need to know.
Nonetheless, I have tried probably 15-20 cases and have directly observed or been involved in many times that range of jury selections.
I bow to your greater experience, of course.
The only people who tried to rig the 2016 election were the Dems with a phony dossier. The gaslighting has been epic. Interesting that CNN and MSNBC aren't covering the trail.
No shit, Batman.
BTW: We were discussing criminal prosecutions, NOT arbitration(s).
Please explain the circumstances where you have directly observed or have been involved in many times that range (15-20) of jury selections in cases that were not yours.
The issue was jury selection. You have been free to state any reason why my experience selecting juries is not applicable to a criminal jury selection. You have chosen not to do so. I know why you haven't; so do you.
You said so yourself.
I’m very impressed with your vast experience participating in arbitrations.
And with all due respect, go fuck yourself.