Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Torn between two lovers . . .

HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
in Tug Tavern
loving both of you is breaking all the rules

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ben-shapiro-dismisses-dinesh-d-souza-s-stolen-election-opus-2000-mules-conclusions-of-the-film-not-justified-by-its-premises/ar-AAXnO0D?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=2e0ba0484987494cb7426cb4f0060c5d
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    RaceBannon said:

    I realize that anything other than lockstep adherence to your leader is foreign to you but people disagree all the time if they aren't leftist scumbags

    Hope this helps

    But Ben's a squish, right?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    MikeDamone said:

    Who cares?

    Pawz?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,075
    edited May 2022
    “The documentary does not make the claim that I think a lot of people are attributing to the documentary,” Shapiro, who also had critiques for some of the fact-checkers, said. “In other words, the process is corrupt and people are violating the law in how they are moving these ballots, but that does not mean that the ballots are being cast by dead people or that they are being punched by somebody in the backroom somewhere.”

    Shapiro argued more than cell phone data is needed to prove that “mules” were passing on fraudulent ballots in favor of Biden. He admitted his opinion might make “nobody happy,” considering his conservative audience.

    I think the data is really interesting. I think that it’s really suspicious for sure. I think that it is dispositive that this alone shifted the election … or that the election was stolen in the sense that actual fraudulent ballots made the difference between victory and loss for Donald Trump in these states. I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.

    Shapiro said he requires more data, but also noted there should be enough suspicious activity for law enforcement to look into the claims.

    I would agree with every word of this. Vote harvesting, which is illegal in most states is what won the election for Biden. Once the mail in ballots went out, the fix was in. Dazzler because he is a boot licking toady thinks all conservatives are the same.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.

    ringing endorsement
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.

    ringing endorsement

    So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,075
    edited May 2022
    HHusky said:

    I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.

    ringing endorsement

    Shapiro supports cleaning up our voter rolls and voter ID and is in favor of a greater investigation into the ballot stuffing, just like you right Dazzler? Or does your "agreement" with Shapiro only go so far?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.

    ringing endorsement

    So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?
    Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.

    ringing endorsement

    Shapiro supports cleaning up our voter rolls and voter ID and is in favor of a greater investigation into the ballot stuffing, just like you right Dazzler? Or does your "agreement" with Shapiro only go so far?
    In much the same way that Mitch McConnell was for impeachment, except it was too late.

    Courageous! (And try not to offend the wing nuts.)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,075
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.

    ringing endorsement

    Shapiro supports cleaning up our voter rolls and voter ID and is in favor of a greater investigation into the ballot stuffing, just like you right Dazzler? Or does your "agreement" with Shapiro only go so far?
    In much the same way that Mitch McConnell was for impeachment, except it was too late.

    Courageous! (And try not to offend the wing nuts.)
    White flag
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.

    ringing endorsement

    So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?
    Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.
    I have no team, ma'am.

    I don't recall ever reading here that Shapiro was convinced the election was stolen or that he agrees with everything DD says. Unlike the leftists, they understand can come to different conclusions and have different opinions without calling each other names and freaking out like you ladies do.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.

    ringing endorsement

    So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?
    Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.
    I have no team, ma'am.

    I don't recall ever reading here that Shapiro was convinced the election was stolen or that he agrees with everything DD says. Unlike the leftists, they understand can come to different conclusions and have different opinions without calling each other names and freaking out like you ladies do.
    Little Ben's gonna get excommunicated at this rate.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,075
    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.

    ringing endorsement

    So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?
    Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.
    I have no team, ma'am.

    I don't recall ever reading here that Shapiro was convinced the election was stolen or that he agrees with everything DD says. Unlike the leftists, they understand can come to different conclusions and have different opinions without calling each other names and freaking out like you ladies do.
    Little Ben's gonna get excommunicated at this rate.
    For making a statement I agree with? This is about as solid as your claim that Obama was in on the Gentle Giant cover-up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.

    ringing endorsement

    So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?
    Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.
    I have no team, ma'am.

    I don't recall ever reading here that Shapiro was convinced the election was stolen or that he agrees with everything DD says. Unlike the leftists, they understand can come to different conclusions and have different opinions without calling each other names and freaking out like you ladies do.
    Little Ben's gonna get excommunicated at this rate.
    JFC. Like I said, you're boring, Sylvia
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Oh NO! Two Conservatives disagree, stop the presses.

    Dazzler, your guy is a fucking disaster. You put him there so you can fuck the fuck off with your BS deflections. Loser.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,930 Founders Club
    So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?

    Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.

    Several? There isn't one on this site who gives a shit what Shaprio thinks. It's his opinion and prerogative. The election was stolen and you can't stand that only freaks think the way you do.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,988 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HHusky said:

    I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.

    ringing endorsement

    So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?
    Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.
    I have no team, ma'am.

    I don't recall ever reading here that Shapiro was convinced the election was stolen or that he agrees with everything DD says. Unlike the leftists, they understand can come to different conclusions and have different opinions without calling each other names and freaking out like you ladies do.
    Little Ben's gonna get excommunicated at this rate.
    Why do you always write in such 1940's ladylike fashion?

    Did your father never speak to you?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.